DRUG
lanreotide (Autogel formulation)
120 mg administered via deep subcutaneous injection every 28 days over 28 weeks.
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
125
Locations
24
Results
Posted
Publications
1
Study summary
The main aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the co-administration of lanreotide Autogel 120 mg (administered via deep sub-cutaneous injections every 28 days) and pegvisomant (administered at 40 to 120 mg per week via sub-cutaneous injection given once or twice a week) on IGF-1 levels over 28 weeks in acromegalic patients. The primary endpoint will be the percentage of acromegalic patients with normalised (age and sex adjusted) IGF-1 level at the end of the co-treatment period.
Interventions
DRUG
120 mg administered via deep subcutaneous injection every 28 days over 28 weeks.
DRUG
Administered at 40 to 120 mg per week via subcutaneous injection once or twice a week over 28 weeks.
Timeline
First posted
Oct 3, 2006
Study start
Oct 2006
Primary completion
Oct 2008
Study completion
Oct 2008
Results posted
Jul 23, 2018
Registry updated
Sep 27, 2022
Outcomes
Percentage of Subjects With Acromegaly With a Normalised (Age and Sex Adjusted) IGF-1 Level at the End of the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Serum IGF-1 is a well known and validated marker of acromegaly. IGF-1 assessments were performed at Visit (V) 1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9 and V11 (or in case of premature study discontinuation, at the early withdrawal visit) and were based on a single serum sample taken in fasting conditions, prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration. Percentage of subjects with a normalised (age and sex adjusted) IGF-1 level at the end of the co-administration period are presented. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to replace missing IGF-1 values.
Percentage of Subjects With Acromegaly With a Normalised (Age and Sex Adjusted) IGF-1 Level at the End of the Co-administration Period; Summarised by Previous Treatment and by Final Dose of Pegvisomant
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Serum IGF-1 is a well known and validated marker of acromegaly. IGF-1 assessments were performed at V1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9 and V11 (or in case of premature study discontinuation, at the early withdrawal visit) and were based on a single serum sample taken in fasting conditions, prior to IMP administration. Percentage of subjects with a normalised (age and sex adjusted) IGF-1 level at the end of the co-administration period, summarised by previous treatment and by final pegvisomant dose are presented. The denominator used to calculate percentages was the number of subjects in each subgroup, comprising previous treatment with pegvisomant, lanreotide Autogel and octreotide long acting repeatable (LAR) and final pegvisomant dose as either 40 mg, 60 mg or 80 mg once a week or 40 mg or 60 mg twice per week. The LOCF approach was used to replace missing IGF-1 values.
Percentage of Subjects With Acromegaly With a Normalised (Age and Sex Adjusted) IGF-1 Level at the End of the Co-administration Period; Summarised by Diabetic Status at Baseline
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Serum IGF-1 is a well known and validated marker of acromegaly. IGF-1 assessments were performed at V1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9 and V11 (or in case of premature study discontinuation, at the early withdrawal visit) and were based on a single serum sample taken in fasting conditions, prior to IMP administration. Percentage of subjects with a normalised (age and sex adjusted) IGF-1 level at the end of the co-administration period, summarised by diabetic status are presented. The denominator used to calculate percentages was the number of subjects in each subgroup (diabetic and non diabetic). The LOCF approach was used to replace missing IGF-1 values.
Percentage of Subjects With a Normalised (Age and Sex Adjusted) IGF-1 Level at Any Time During the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Serum IGF-1 is a well known and validated marker of acromegaly. IGF-1 assessments were performed at V1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9 and V11 (or in case of premature study discontinuation, at the early withdrawal visit) and were based on a single serum sample taken in fasting conditions, prior to IMP administration. Percentage of subjects with a normalised (age and sex adjusted) IGF-1 level at least once during the co-administration period, summarised by 'while taking the final dose during co-administration' and 'at any time during co-administration' are presented.
Percentage of Subjects With Normalised (Age and Sex Adjusted) IGF-1 at Each Assessment
Time frame · V1 (Screening) up to V11 (Week 44)
Serum IGF-1 is a well known and validated marker of acromegaly. IGF-1 assessments were performed at V1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9 and V11 (or in case of premature study discontinuation, at the early withdrawal visit) and were based on a single serum sample taken in fasting conditions, prior to IMP administration. The percentage of subjects with a normalised (age and sex adjusted) IGF-1 level is presented. The denominator used to calculate the percentages was the number of ITT population subjects with an assessment at the visit. In addition to the data for each individual visit, the last value available (LVA) data is also presented. None of the ITT population subjects had serum IGF-1 normalised at V3, consistent with the criterion to continue in the study and be treated in the co-administration period.
Change From Baseline in Serum IGF-1 Levels (Expressed as Z-scores) During the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
The change in serum IGF-1 levels, expressed as z-scores calculated using the age and sex specific mean and standard deviation \[SD\] values from Baseline to V11 and to LVA are presented. A z-score between +/- 2 indicates a normal IGF-1 concentration.
Change From Baseline in Acromegaly Symptoms During the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Acromegaly symptoms, including arthralgia, excessive perspiration, fatigue, headache and soft tissue swelling were assessed with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 8 (severe, incapacitating symptoms). Symptoms were assessed by the subject in paper format before any other procedure planned during the visit. The change in acromegaly symptoms from Baseline to V11 and to LVA are presented.
Change From Baseline in Acromegaly Quality of Life (ACROQoL) Assessments During the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
The ACROQoL is a health-related quality of life (QoL) questionnaire for patients with acromegaly consisting of 22 items measured on a 5-point Likert-type scale that assesses frequency of occurrence (always to never) or degree of agreement (completely agree to completely disagree) with the statements. The ACROQoL consists of questions that evaluate physical (8 items) and psychological aspects related to appearance and personal relations (7 items each). Answers are transformed to a percentage value, where 100 is the maximal (best) and 0 the minimum (worse) score depicting self-perceived quality QoL. An increase in ACROQoL score is associated with an improved QoL. The change in ACROQoL global score, physical and psychological dimension scores and appearance and personal relationships sub-dimension scores from Baseline to V11 and to LVA are presented. Relnship = Relationship; Dim = Dimension.
Correlation Between the Changes in ACROQoL Assessments With the Corresponding Changes in Z-score of IGF-1 Levels Over the Run-in Period and Co-administration Period
Time frame · At V2 (Day 1; Run-in), V3 (Week 12; Baseline) and V11 (Week 44)
The correlation between the changes in ACROQoL (expressed as standardised scores and undertaken for global score, physical and psychological dimension scores and appearance and personal relationships sub-dimension scores) over the run-in period (V3 minus V2) and co-administration period (V11 and LVA minus V3) with the corresponding changes in z-score for the IGF-1 level is presented. A decrease in IGF-1 z-score represents an improvement and an increase in ACROQoL score represents an improvement. Spearman's rank correlation (r) values are presented for change from V2 to V3 (Baseline) and from Baseline to V11/LVA for each of the specified ACROQoL categories. Corr = Correlation; Dim = Dimension; Relnship = Relationship.
Change From Baseline in Mean Weight From Baseline During the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Weight was recorded at V2, V3 and V11 (or in case of premature study discontinuation, at the early withdrawal visit). The change in mean weight from Baseline to V11 and to LVA are presented.
Change From Baseline in Mean Supine Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) During the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Blood pressure (supine after resting for 3 minutes) was recorded at V1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9 and V11 (or in case of premature study discontinuation, at the early withdrawal visit). The change in mean BP (systolic and diastolic) from Baseline to V11 and to LVA are presented.
Change From Baseline in Mean Supine Heart Rate During the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Heart rate (supine after resting for 3 minutes) was recorded at V1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9 and V11 (or in case of premature study discontinuation, at the early withdrawal visit). The change in mean heart rate from Baseline to V11 and to LVA are presented.
Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate During the Co-administration Period
Time frame · V3 (Week 12; Baseline) up to V11 (Week 44)
Twelve-lead ECG recordings were performed at V2, V3 and V11. Sinus rhythm, heart rate, PR interval, RR interval, QRS interval and QT interval were measured and heart rate corrected QT interval using the Fridericia method (QTcF) was calculated. The change in ECG mean heart rate from Baseline to V11 and to LVA is presented.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria: * The patient must have had documentation supporting the diagnosis of acromegaly, including elevated GH and/or IGF-1 levels * The patient is treated with pegvisomant, because of IGF-1 level remaining above ULN when treated with somatostatin analogue, on a daily basis for at least 3 months and has normal (age and sex adjusted) IGF-1 level, or IGF-1 level above the upper limit of normal (ULN) after treatment with pegvisomant 30 mg per day, OR the patient is treated with lanreotide Autogel or octreotide LAR for at least 6 months including 3 months at the highest marketed dose and has a serum IGF-1 level above ULN, 28 days after the last injection * At the end of the run-in period, The patient has a serum IGF-1 level above 1.2 x ULN, or a serum IGF-1 level between ULN and 1.2 x ULN and a serum GH nadir \> 1 µg/L (assessed by an OGTT), 28 days after the 3rd injection of lanreotide Autogel 120 mg OR the patient is diabetic and has a serum IGF-1 level above 1.2 ULN, 28 days after the 3rd injection of lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Exclusion Criteria: * The patient has undergone pituitary surgery or radiotherapy within 6 months prior to study entry, or it is anticipated that it will be done during the study * The patient has already been treated with a somatostatin analogue associated with a GH antagonist * The patient has received dopamine agonist within 6 weeks prior to the study entry * The patient has abnormal hepatic function at study entry (defined as AST, ALT, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, prothrombin time or total bilirubin above 2 ULN) * The patient is at risk of pregnancy or is lactating
Study locations
Czechia · Denmark · France · Germany · Greece · Italy · Netherlands · Spain · Sweden · United Kingdom. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.
University Hospital, Charles University
Hradec Králové, Czechia
Charles University
Prague, Czechia
Aarhus Kommunehospital
Aarhus, Denmark
Groupe Hospitalier Henri Mondor- Albert Chenevier
Créteil, France
Hôpital Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
Clinique Marc Linquette
Lille, France
Hôpital de la Timone
Marseille, France
CHU de Rangueil
Toulouse, France
Charite Campus Mitte
Berlin, Germany
Klinikum Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt, Germany
Medizinische Klinik Innenstadt
München, Germany
Anticancer Hospital Metaxa Piraeus
Piraeus, Greece
Universitá degli Studi di Milano
Milan, Italy
University Federico II
Naples, Italy
Universitá di Torino
Torino, Italy
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, Netherlands
Dept. of Internal Medicine Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Hospital General de Alicante
Alicante, Spain
Clínica Puerta de Hierro
Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, Sweden
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, Sweden
Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute
Manchester, United Kingdom
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, United Kingdom
Related trials
Camurus AB · Gastro-enteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
332
2026-07
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc. · Carcinoid Syndrome · Carcinoid
Phase 3
Recruiting
141
2026-06
West China Hospital · Neuroendocrine Tumors
Not applicable
Active, not recruiting
500
2026-04
National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan · Neuroendocrine Tumors,Gastroenteropancreatic
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Recruiting
49
2026-04
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD
Phase 3
Completed
159
2026-04
SWOG Cancer Research Network · Pancreatic Carcinoma · Pancreatic Neoplasm
Phase 3
Recruiting
274
2026-03
RayzeBio, Inc. · GEP-NET · Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
Phase 3
Recruiting
338
2026-03
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc. · Carcinoid Syndrome · Carcinoid
Phase 2
Completed
36
2026-03
Related PeptideStat pages
Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.