DRUG
larazotide acetate
gelatin capsule
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
105
Locations
33
Results
Not posted
Publications
0
Study summary
This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of larazotide acetate versus placebo in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease.
This was an outpatient, randomized, parallel- group, double-blind, multicenter, 8-week study with three treatment arms: larazotide acetate 4 mg TID, larazotide acetate 8 mg TID and placebo TID in subjects with celiac disease. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of larazotide acetate versus placebo in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease, as defined by an improvement in the Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) ratio, obtained by duodeno-jejunal biopsy. Secondary objectives included assessment of the safety and tolerability of larazotide acetate, to prospectively validate the components of a composite weighted index of celiac disease activity (celiac disease Activity Rating Score, CeDARS), individually and as a whole, to To compare the CeDARS against the Clinician Global Assessment of disease (CGA), Psychological Well Being Index and the Short Form 12 version 2 (SF-12 v2) health survey and to assess the effects of larazotide acetate on inflammatory markers in subjects with active celiac disease.
Interventions
DRUG
gelatin capsule
DRUG
gelatin capsule
Timeline
First posted
Feb 21, 2008
Study start
Feb 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2009
Study completion
Dec 2009
Results posted
Not reported
Registry updated
Sep 20, 2017
Outcomes
Assess the efficacy of larazotide acetate in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease
Time frame · duodeno-jejunal biopsies were performed at Baseline and Day 56
Remission was defined as an improvement in the Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) ratio obtained by duodeno-jejunal biopsy.
Assess the safety and tolerability of larazotide acetate
Time frame · Up to 8 weeks
Safety endpoints assessed in this study were adverse events, vital signs, physical examination results, clinical laboratory test results and ECG results. Plasma larazotide acetate and metabolites, as well as potential serum antibodies against larazotide acetate, were also determined.
To prospectively validate the components of a composite weighted index of Celiac Disease activity (Celiac Disease Activity Rating Score, CeDARS), individually and as a whole.
Time frame · Up to 8 weeks
Candidate components of the CeDARS Index measured in this study were GSRS, anti-tTG antibodies, LAMA ratio, Hb, ferritin, body weight, triceps skin fold thickness, BMI, urinary nitrates
To compare the CeDARS against the Clinician Global Assessment of disease (CGA), Psychological Well Being Index (PWBI) and the Short Form 12 version 2 (SF-12v2) health survey.
Time frame · CGA, PWBI and SF-12v2 were collected at Visits 2, 3 and 4.
The CGA was completed by the PI or designee; the PWBI and SF-12v2 were completed by the subject.
To assess the effects of larazotide acetate on inflammatory markers in subjects with active celiac disease subjects
Time frame · Blood draws occurred at Visits 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Blood for serum was drawn for potential future determination of inflammatory mediators that might be involved in the response of Celiac Disease to larazotide acetate, such as cytokines (e.g. TNF-α,IFN-γ) or the putative permeability factor "zonulin".
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female adults with celiac disease (as demonstrated by duodenal/jejunal biopsy or by capsule endoscopy plus positive anti-tTG) * Marsh score ≥ II at screening * Positive serum anti-tTG antibodies as determined by screening serology * Willing to comply with a gluten-free diet for the duration of the study Exclusion Criteria: * Has refractory Celiac Disease or severe complications of celiac disease (eg, EATL-, ulcerative jejunitis, perforation, etc.) * Has chronic active GI disease other than Celiac Disease * Has diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2) or other autoimmune disease that might interfere with the conduct of the study * Has hemoglobin value below 8.5 g/dL
Study locations
Canada · Spain · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.
Study Site
Orange, California, United States
Study Site
San Francisco, California, United States
Study Site
Torrington, Connecticut, United States
Study Site
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Study Site
Topeka, Kansas, United States
Study Site
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Study Site
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
Study Site
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
Study Site
Chesterfield, Michigan, United States
Study Site
Troy, Michigan, United States
Study Site
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Study Site
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Study Site
Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States
Study Site
Gallipolis, Ohio, United States
Study Site
Paoli, Pennsylvania, United States
Study Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Study Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Study Site
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Study Site
Franklin, Tennessee, United States
Study Site
Houston, Texas, United States
Study Site
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Study Site
Abbotsford British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
Study Site
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Study Site
Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
Publications
No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.
Related trials
Amicus Therapeutics · Fabry Disease
Not applicable
Recruiting
450
2026-07
Amicus Therapeutics · Fabry Disease
Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
14
2026-07
Amicus Therapeutics · Fabry Disease
Phase 3
Recruiting
8
2026-06
Massachusetts General Hospital · Long COVID · Long COVID-19
Phase 2
Active, not recruiting
107
2026-05
Amicus Therapeutics · Fabry Disease
Phase 3
Completed
16
2026-02
Amicus Therapeutics · Fabry Disease
Not applicable
Available
—
2025-07
Massachusetts General Hospital · Covid19 · Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
Phase 2
Terminated
12
2024-06
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc. · Celiac Disease
Phase 3
Terminated
307
2022-07
Related PeptideStat pages
Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.