Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT00620451·Phase 2·INTERVENTIONAL

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Larazotide Acetate in Subjects With Active Celiac Disease

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 2

Enrollment

105

Locations

33

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of larazotide acetate versus placebo in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease.

Full detailed description

This was an outpatient, randomized, parallel- group, double-blind, multicenter, 8-week study with three treatment arms: larazotide acetate 4 mg TID, larazotide acetate 8 mg TID and placebo TID in subjects with celiac disease. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of larazotide acetate versus placebo in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease, as defined by an improvement in the Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) ratio, obtained by duodeno-jejunal biopsy. Secondary objectives included assessment of the safety and tolerability of larazotide acetate, to prospectively validate the components of a composite weighted index of celiac disease activity (celiac disease Activity Rating Score, CeDARS), individually and as a whole, to To compare the CeDARS against the Clinician Global Assessment of disease (CGA), Psychological Well Being Index and the Short Form 12 version 2 (SF-12 v2) health survey and to assess the effects of larazotide acetate on inflammatory markers in subjects with active celiac disease.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

larazotide acetate

gelatin capsule

DRUG

placebo

gelatin capsule

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Feb 21, 2008

  2. Study start

    Feb 2008

  3. Primary completion

    Jul 2009

  4. Study completion

    Dec 2009

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Sep 20, 2017

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Assess the efficacy of larazotide acetate in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease

Time frame · duodeno-jejunal biopsies were performed at Baseline and Day 56

Remission was defined as an improvement in the Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) ratio obtained by duodeno-jejunal biopsy.

Secondary outcomes

Assess the safety and tolerability of larazotide acetate

Time frame · Up to 8 weeks

Safety endpoints assessed in this study were adverse events, vital signs, physical examination results, clinical laboratory test results and ECG results. Plasma larazotide acetate and metabolites, as well as potential serum antibodies against larazotide acetate, were also determined.

To prospectively validate the components of a composite weighted index of Celiac Disease activity (Celiac Disease Activity Rating Score, CeDARS), individually and as a whole.

Time frame · Up to 8 weeks

Candidate components of the CeDARS Index measured in this study were GSRS, anti-tTG antibodies, LAMA ratio, Hb, ferritin, body weight, triceps skin fold thickness, BMI, urinary nitrates

To compare the CeDARS against the Clinician Global Assessment of disease (CGA), Psychological Well Being Index (PWBI) and the Short Form 12 version 2 (SF-12v2) health survey.

Time frame · CGA, PWBI and SF-12v2 were collected at Visits 2, 3 and 4.

The CGA was completed by the PI or designee; the PWBI and SF-12v2 were completed by the subject.

To assess the effects of larazotide acetate on inflammatory markers in subjects with active celiac disease subjects

Time frame · Blood draws occurred at Visits 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Blood for serum was drawn for potential future determination of inflammatory mediators that might be involved in the response of Celiac Disease to larazotide acetate, such as cytokines (e.g. TNF-α,IFN-γ) or the putative permeability factor "zonulin".

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female adults with celiac disease (as demonstrated by duodenal/jejunal biopsy or by capsule endoscopy plus positive anti-tTG) * Marsh score ≥ II at screening * Positive serum anti-tTG antibodies as determined by screening serology * Willing to comply with a gluten-free diet for the duration of the study Exclusion Criteria: * Has refractory Celiac Disease or severe complications of celiac disease (eg, EATL-, ulcerative jejunitis, perforation, etc.) * Has chronic active GI disease other than Celiac Disease * Has diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2) or other autoimmune disease that might interfere with the conduct of the study * Has hemoglobin value below 8.5 g/dL

Study locations

33 registered sites.

Canada · Spain · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Study Site

Orange, California, United States

Study Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Study Site

Torrington, Connecticut, United States

Study Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Study Site

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Study Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Study Site

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Study Site

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Study Site

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Study Site

Troy, Michigan, United States

Study Site

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Study Site

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Study Site

Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States

Study Site

Gallipolis, Ohio, United States

Study Site

Paoli, Pennsylvania, United States

Study Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Study Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Study Site

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Study Site

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Study Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Study Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Study Site

Abbotsford British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada

Study Site

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Study Site

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Larazotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.