Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT00690898·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Lanreotide as Primary Treatment for Acromegalic Patients With Pituitary Gland Macroadenoma

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

108

Locations

27

Results

Posted

Publications

2

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Acromegaly is a chronic disease caused by excessive secretion of growth hormone (GH) and mainly due to benign tumour localized in the pituitary gland. The disease develops insidiously, causing a gradual progression of symptoms; consequently most patients are diagnosed in their fourth decade of life. Administration of somatostatin analogues such as lanreotide have been shown to result in normalisation or the decrease of GH and insulin growth factor (IGF-1) levels and improvement of clinical symptoms in acromegalic patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether lanreotide is also effective on tumour volume reduction (tumour shrinkage) and the benefits of this potential tumour shrinkage on disease symptoms and patient's quality of life.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Lanreotide autogel 120 mg

12 months

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jun 5, 2008

  2. Study start

    May 2008

  3. Primary completion

    Feb 2012

  4. Study completion

    Feb 2012

  5. Results posted

    Dec 23, 2013

  6. Registry updated

    Oct 14, 2022

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Percentage of Patients With Relevant Reduction in Pituitary Tumour Volume (as Measured by MRI) From Baseline Volume (Visit 1) to Week 48 (After 12 Injections at Visit 5)

Time frame · Week 1 and Week 48

A blinded, centrally assessed evaluation of all MRIs was performed. A 20% reduction from the volume at Visit 1 was considered to be clinically relevant.

Secondary outcomes

Number of Patients With at Least a 20% Reduction in Tumour Volume From Baseline Volume (Visit 1) to Week 12 (Visit 3) and Week 24 (Visit 4).

Time frame · Baseline (week 1) to week 12 and week 24

Percent Variation From Baseline to Visit 3, 4 and 5 (Week 12, 24, and 48) of IGF-1 Levels

Time frame · Week 12, 24, and 48

Percent Variation From Baseline to Visit 3, 4 and 5 (Week 12, 24, and 48) of Serum GH Levels.

Time frame · Week 12, 24, and 48

Change From Baseline to Visit 3, 4 and 5 (Week 12, 24, and 48) of Prolactin Levels

Time frame · Week 12, 24 and 48

Percentage of Patients With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Clinical Signs of Acromegaly (Arthralgia) From Baseline

Time frame · Week 12, 24 and 48

The status of clinical signs of acromegaly assessed by an acromegaly symptoms questionnaire (paper form) completed by the patient at each study visit. The scoring for each clinical sign of acromegaly on the questionnaire is from 0 (no symptom) to 8 (severe, incapacitating symptom). The variation (or no variation) in scores indicate whether the clinical sign of acromegaly had improved, worsened or was unchanged.

Percentage of Patients With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Clinical Signs of Acromegaly (Excessive Perspiration) From Baseline

Time frame · Week 12, 24 and 48

The status of clinical signs of acromegaly assessed by an acromegaly symptoms questionnaire (paper form) completed by the patient at each study visit. The scoring for each clinical sign of acromegaly on the questionnaire is from 0 (no symptom) to 8 (severe, incapacitating symptom). The variation (or no variation) in scores indicate whether the clinical sign of acromegaly had improved, worsened or was unchanged.

Percentage of Patients With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Clinical Signs of Acromegaly (Fatigue) From Baseline

Time frame · Week 12, 24 and 48

The status of clinical signs of acromegaly assessed by an acromegaly symptoms questionnaire (paper form) completed by the patient at each study visit. The scoring for each clinical sign of acromegaly on the questionnaire is from 0 (no symptom) to 8 (severe, incapacitating symptom). The variation (or no variation) in scores indicate whether the clinical sign of acromegaly had improved, worsened or was unchanged.

Percentage of Patients With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Clinical Signs of Acromegaly (Headache) From Baseline

Time frame · Week 12, 24 and 48

The status of clinical signs of acromegaly assessed by an acromegaly symptoms questionnaire (paper form) completed by the patient at each study visit. The scoring for each clinical sign of acromegaly on the questionnaire is from 0 (no symptom) to 8 (severe, incapacitating symptom). The variation (or no variation) in scores indicate whether the clinical sign of acromegaly had improved, worsened or was unchanged.

Percentage of Patients With Improved, Unchanged or Worsened Clinical Signs of Acromegaly (Soft Tissue Swelling) From Baseline

Time frame · Week 12, 24 and 48

The status of clinical signs of acromegaly assessed by an acromegaly symptoms questionnaire (paper form) completed by the patient at each study visit. The scoring for each clinical sign of acromegaly on the questionnaire is from 0 (no symptom) to 8 (severe, incapacitating symptom). The variation (or no variation) in scores indicate whether the clinical sign of acromegaly had improved, worsened or was unchanged.

Changes in the Global Acromegaly Quality of Life Assessment (AcroQoL) From Baseline

Time frame · Week 12, 24 and 48

Acromegaly Quality of Life Assessment (AcroQoL) questionnaire response scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate best possible Quality of Life.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * The patient has given written informed consent prior to any study related procedures * The patient is male or female and is aged between 18 and 75 years, inclusive, * Diagnosis of acromegaly defined by i) GH nadir \> 1 ng/mL as assessed by an oral glucose tolerance test for non diabetic patients (central laboratory results) or a mean GH level \> 1 ng/mL based on 5 samples taken every 10 to 15 minutes for diabetic patients ( central laboratory results) AND ii) IGF-1 concentrations elevated above the age- and sex-matched normal range for diabetic and non diabetic patients (central laboratory results), * The patient has a pituitary adenoma with a diameter greater than or equal to 10 mm based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) central reading, * The patient has no visual field defect identified at the visual evaluation, performed by Goldman Visual Fields Analyser and Automated visual field static perimeter, except visual field abnormality at the time of screening and that is in the investigator's Clinical judgement: * Not related to the pituitary adenoma * Clinically stable condition not presumed to change during the study period * Not modifying the ability to evaluate visual field changes related to the macroadenoma Exclusion Criteria: * The patient has a history of hypersensitivity to Lanreotide or drugs with a similar chemical structure, * The patient has received any unlicensed drug within the 30 days prior to the screening visit or is scheduled to receive an unlicensed drug during the course of the study, * The patient is likely to require treatment during the study with somatostatin analogues other than Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg, dopamine agonist, GH receptor antagonist (pegvisomant), and Cyclosporine or drugs that are not permitted by the study protocol, * The patient is a female at risk of pregnancy during the study and is not using acceptable contraceptive methods. Females of childbearing potential must provide a negative pregnancy test at start of study and must be using oral, double barrier (condom with spermicidal jelly, foam suppository, or film; diaphragm with spermicide; or male condom and diaphragm with spermicide), injectable contraception or an intra uterine device. Non childbearing potential is defined as post-menopause for at least 1 year, surgical sterilisation or hysterectomy at least three months before the start of the study, * The patient is pregnant or lactating, * The patient has a history of, or known current, problems with alcohol abuse, * The patient has any mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude. * The patient has abnormal baseline findings, any other medical condition(s) or laboratory findings that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might jeopardize the patient's safety or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objective(s) of the study, * The patient has undergone pituitary surgery or pituitary radiotherapy prior to study entry, * The patient has previously been treated with a somatostatin analogue, * The patient has received a dopamine agonist or a GH receptor antagonist (pegvisomant) prior to study entry, * The patient is expected to require pituitary surgery (adenomectomy) or to receive radiotherapy during the study period, * Patients with suspected associated prolactinoma: prolactin level \> 100 ng/mL (central laboratory results), * Patient is allergic to Gadolinium (MRI contrast agent) or has acute or chronic severe renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate \<30 mL/min/1.73m2), * Patient known by Investigator, to have congenital or acquired optic nerve disease or any visual abnormality with risk of worsening during the course of the study (e.g glaucoma), influencing ability to evaluate Visual Field changes related to the macroadenoma.

Study locations

27 registered sites.

Belgium · Czechia · Finland · France · Germany · Italy · Netherlands · Turkey (Türkiye) · United Kingdom. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

University Hospital Antwerpen

Edegem, Belgium

Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice, Karlova Univerzita

Prague, Czechia

Helsinki University Center Hospital

Helsinki, Finland

The Turku University Central Hospital

Turku, Finland

Hopital De Bois Guillaume

Bois-Guillaume, France

CHU Henri Mondor

Créteil, France

CHU Grenoble Albert Michallon

Grenoble, France

CHRU Lille Hopital Claude Huriez

Lille, France

Groupement Hospitalier Est

Lyon, France

Hôpital de la Timone

Marseille, France

Hôpital Bicêtre

Paris, France

Hopital Haut Leveque

Pessac, France

CHU de Reims, Hopital Robert Debré

Reims, France

Friedrich-Alexander University

Erlangen, Germany

Universitatsklinikum Essen

Essen, Germany

Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität

Frankfurt, Germany

ENDOC Zentrum für Endokrine Tumoren und Praxis für Endokrinologie, Andrologie und medikamentöse Tumortherapie

Hamburg, Germany

Medizinische Klinik Innenstadt

München, Germany

AOU Policlinico "G. Martino" Messina

Messina, Italy

Università Federico II di Napoli, Dipartimento di Endocrinologia Molecolare e Clinicae Oncologia

Naples, Italy

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico A. Gemelli, U.O.C. di Endocrinologia

Roma, Italy

ERASMUS MC Rotterdam

Rotterdam, Netherlands

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, Netherlands

Cerrahpasa Medical Facility

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Related trials

More studies on Lanreotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.