Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT00708162·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Phase 3 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Elvitegravir Versus Raltegravir

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

724

Locations

180

Results

Posted

Publications

1

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a regimen containing once-daily elvitegravir (EVG) versus twice-daily raltegravir (RAL) added to a background regimen (1 fully-active ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) plus 1 or 2 additional antiretroviral (ARV) agents) in HIV-1 infected, ARV treatment-experienced adults who have documented resistance, or at least six months experience prior to screening with two or more different classes of ARV agents. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive EVG plus background regimen (Elvitegravir group), or raltegravir plus background regimen (Raltegravir group). Due to known drug interactions, participants in the Elvitegravir group receiving RTV-boosted atazanavir (ATV) or RTV-boosted lopinavir (LPV) as part of their background regimen will receive elvitegravir at a lower dose (85 mg).

Full detailed description

The background regimen will be constructed by the investigator based on viral resistance testing. The fully active PI will be defined by phenotypic resistance analysis. For phenotypic susceptibility, fully active is defined as being below the lower clinical or biological cutoff. Participants are required to take their ritonavir dose based on the dosing schedule indicated in the prescribing information for the PI; no additional ritonavir is required to be taken with EVG. No other marketed PIs are allowed as part of the background regimen due to unknown drug interactions. The second agent can be one nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), etravirine, maraviroc, or T-20. However, the second agent must not include an integrase inhibitor; the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors efavirenz, nevirapine, or delavirdine (due to unknown drug interactions); or the fixed-dose combination therapies Atripla® or Trizivir® (abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine). The second agent may or may not be fully active (except in Spain, where participants have to receive a fully active second agent, as requested by the Spanish regulatory agency). If the M184V/I reverse transcriptase (RT) mutation is present on the screening genotype report and an NRTI is used as the second agent, then either FTC or LAM may be added as a third agent in the background regimen to maintain the M184V/I mutation. In this situation only, the fixed-dose combination therapies Combivir®, Truvada®, or Epzicom/Kivexa® may be prescribed as the combined second and third agents of the background regimen. After Week 96, participants will continue to take their blinded study drug and attend visits until treatment assignments are unblinded, at which point they will be given the option to participate in an open-label EVG extension phase of the study.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Elvitegravir

Elvitegravir (EVG) tablet administered orally once daily with food

DRUG

Raltegravir

Raltegravir tablet administered orally twice daily according to prescribing information

DRUG

EVG placebo

Placebo to match elvitegravir administered orally once daily

DRUG

RAL placebo

RAL placebo administered orally twice daily.

DRUG

Background regimen

Background Regimen (administered according to prescribing information) contains 1 fully-active ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) plus 1 or 2 additional agents. The ritonavir-boosted PIs include either ATV, darunavir, fosamprenavir, LPV (Kaletra®), or tipranavir; the additional agents include abacavir (ABC), Combivir® (lamivudine (LAM)/zidovudine (ZDV) coformulated), didanosine, emtricitabine (FTC), enfuvirtide, Epzicom® (ABC/LAM coformulated), etravirine, LAM, maraviroc, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), Truvada®, (FTC/TDF coformulated), and/or ZDV.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jul 2, 2008

  2. Study start

    Jul 2008

  3. Primary completion

    Dec 2010

  4. Study completion

    Apr 2015

  5. Results posted

    Nov 6, 2014

  6. Registry updated

    May 30, 2016

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

Time frame · Week 48

The percentage of participants achieving and maintaining confirmed HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the FDA-defined Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) algorithm, which takes into account a patient's longitudinal viral load up to the predefined time point by considering patterns of suppression and rebounding.

Secondary outcomes

Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96

Time frame · Week 96

The percentage of participants achieving and maintaining confirmed HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the FDA-defined TLOVR algorithm, which takes into account a patient's longitudinal viral load up to the predefined time point by considering patterns of suppression and rebounding.

Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48

Time frame · Week 48

The percentage of participants achieving and maintaining confirmed HIV-1 RNA \< 400 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the FDA-defined TLOVR algorithm, which takes into account a patient's longitudinal viral load up to the predefined time point by considering patterns of suppression and rebounding.

Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96

Time frame · Week 96

The percentage of participants achieving and maintaining confirmed HIV-1 RNA \< 400 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the FDA-defined TLOVR algorithm, which takes into account a patient's longitudinal viral load up to the predefined time point by considering patterns of suppression and rebounding.

Virologic Response at Week 48 (HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL)

Time frame · Week 48

Virologic response at Week 48 (percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL) was analyzed using the FDA-defined Snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using the viral load along with study drug discontinuation status at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time.

Virologic Response at Week 96 (HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL)

Time frame · Week 96

Virologic response at Week 96 (percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL) was analyzed using the FDA-defined Snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using the viral load along with study drug discontinuation status at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time.

Percentage of Participants With Pure Virologic Failure (HIV-1 RNA Cutoff at 50 Copies/mL) up to Week 48

Time frame · Baseline to Week 48

The percentage of participants with pure virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA cutoff at 50 copies/mL) up to Week 48 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method in the time to event analysis.

Percentage of Participants With Pure Virologic Failure (HIV-1 RNA Cutoff at 50 Copies/mL) up to Week 96

Time frame · Baseline to Week 96

The percentage of participants with pure virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA cutoff at 50 copies/mL) up to Week 96 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method in the time to event analysis.

Percentage of Participants With Pure Virologic Failure (HIV-1 RNA Cutoff at 400 Copies/mL) up to Week 48

Time frame · Baseline to Week 48

The percentage of participants with pure virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA cutoff at 400 copies/mL) up to Week 48 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method in the time to event analysis.

Percentage of Participants With Pure Virologic Failure (HIV-1 RNA Cutoff at 400 Copies/mL) up to Week 96

Time frame · Baseline to Week 96

The percentage of participants with pure virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA cutoff at 400 copies/mL) up to Week 96 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method in the time to event analysis.

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

Time frame · Week 48

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the missing = failure method, where participants with missing data were considered as having failed to meet the criteria for evaluation.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels ≥ 1,000 copies/mL at screening * Documented resistance or at least six months experience prior to screening with two or more different classes of antiretroviral agents * Stable antiretroviral regimen for at least 30 days prior to screening: however, participants may discontinue the antiretroviral regimen after screening and remain off therapy until baseline at the discretion of the investigator * Eligible to receive one of the fully-active ritonavir-boosted-PIs, and an allowed second agent * Normal ECG * Adequate renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula ≥ 60 mL/min) * Hepatic transaminases ≤ 5 × upper limit of normal * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL, or normal direct bilirubin * Adequate hematologic function (absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,000/mm\^3; platelets ≥ 50,000/mm\^3; hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL) * Serum amylase \< 1.5 × the upper limit of the normal range * Negative serum pregnancy test (females of childbearing potential only) * Males and females of childbearing potential must agree to use highly effective contraception methods * Age ≥ 18 years * Life expectancy ≥ 1 year * Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: * New AIDS-defining condition diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening * Prior treatment with any HIV-1 integrase inhibitor * Participants experiencing ascites * Participants experiencing encephalopathy * Females who are breastfeeding * Positive serum pregnancy test at any time during the study (female of childbearing potential) * Participants receiving ongoing therapy with any disallowed medication * Current alcohol or substance use judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with study compliance * Malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma or basal cell carcinoma * Active, serious infections (other than HIV-1 infection) requiring parenteral antibiotic or antifungal therapy within 30 days prior to baseline * Participation in any other clinical trial (except for the etravirine or maraviroc expanded access program), without prior approval from sponsor * Any other clinical condition or prior therapy that would make participants unsuitable for the study * Known hypersensitivity to study drug, metabolites or formulation excipients

Study locations

180 registered sites.

Australia · Belgium · Canada · France · Germany · Italy · Mexico · Netherlands · Portugal · Puerto Rico · Spain · Switzerland · United Kingdom · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Southwest Center for HIV/AIDS

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Health for Life Clinic, PLLC

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Pacific Oaks Medical Group

Beverly Hills, California, United States

AIDS Healthcare Foundation-Research Center

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Center for Special Immunology

Fountain Valley, California, United States

The Living Hope Foundation

Long Beach, California, United States

Kaiser Permanente

Los Angeles, California, United States

Jeffrey Goodman Special Care Clinic

Los Angeles, California, United States

University of Southern California, AIDS Clinical Trials Unit

Los Angeles, California, United States

Peter J. Ruane, MD, Inc.

Los Angeles, California, United States

Tony Mills, MD Internal Medicine

Los Angeles, California, United States

Orange Coast Medical Group

Newport Beach, California, United States

Alameda County Medical Center

Oakland, California, United States

East Bay AIDS Center

Oakland, California, United States

Kaiser Permanente

Sacramento, California, United States

David J. Shamblaw, MD Inc.

San Diego, California, United States

Metropolis Medical

San Francisco, California, United States

San Francisco VA Medical Center/UCSF

San Francisco, California, United States

Connecticut Health Care Group

Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States

Circle Medical LLC

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

The Stamford Hospital - Stamford ID

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Whitman-Walker Clinic

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

The George Washington University Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

South Florida Clinical Research

Atlantis, Florida, United States

Related trials

More studies on Enfuvirtide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.