Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT00838916·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

A Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Albiglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

779

Locations

337

Results

Posted

Publications

4

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

A study to determine the safety and efficacy of albiglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

BIOLOGICAL

albiglutide

albiglutide weekly injection

DRUG

insulin glargine

insulin glargine

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Feb 9, 2009

  2. Study start

    Feb 2009

  3. Primary completion

    Jan 2012

  4. Study completion

    May 2013

  5. Results posted

    Jun 4, 2014

  6. Registry updated

    Jan 9, 2017

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

Time frame · Baseline and Week 52

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. Difference of least squares means (albiglutide - insulin glargine) is from the ANCOVA model. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-Baseline HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values.

Secondary outcomes

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 156

Time frame · Baseline and Week 156

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

Time frame · Baseline and Week 52

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline FPG + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156

Time frame · Baseline and Week 156

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

Time frame · Week 52

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of \<6.5%, \<7%, and \<7.5% at Week 52) were assessed.

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

Time frame · Week 156

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of \<6.5%, \<7%, and \<7.5% at Week 156) were assessed.

Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

Time frame · From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG \>=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between \>=Week 2 and \<Week 4; FPG \>=250 mg/dL between \>=Week 4 and \<Week 12; HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline between \>=Week 12 and \<Week 24; HbA1c \>=8.5% between \>=Week 24 and \<Week 48; HbA1c \>=8.0% between \>= Week 48 and \<Week 156. Participants could have been rescued at any time on or after Week 2. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is defined as the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of the last visit during the active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time was divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

Time frame · Baseline and Week 52

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156

Time frame · Baseline and Week 156

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight.

Change From Baseline in Glucose Profile Measured by 24-hour Area Under Curve (AUC) at Week 52

Time frame · Baseline and Week 52

A 24-hour glucose profile was collected at Baseline and Week 52 at a subset of sites in a subset of participants per treatment group using the continuous glucose monitoring device. Glucose measurements were obtained at 5 minute increments in the 24-hour period. The area under the curve (AUC) was determined using the trapezoidal method on the measurements obtained during the first 24 hours of continuous monitoring. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment.

Albiglutide Plasma Concentrations at Week 8 and Week 24

Time frame · Weeks 8 and 24

Albiglutide plasma concentration data was analyzed at Week 8 pre-dose, Week 8 post-dose, Week 24 pre-dose and Week 24 post-dose. All participants receiving albiglutide were initiated on a 30 mg weekly dosing regimen; however, beginning at Week 4, uptitration of albiglutide was allowed based on glycemic response. As such, albiglutide plasma concentrations achieved at each sampling time represent a mixed population of participants receiving either 30 mg or 50 mg weekly for various durations.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * type 2 diabetes * BMI 20-45kg/m2 inclusive Exclusion Criteria: * females who are pregnant, lactating or within \<6 weeks post-partum * current symptomatic heart failure (NYHA Class III-IV)

Study locations

337 registered sites.

Russia · South Africa · United Kingdom · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

GSK Investigational Site

Alabaster, Alabama, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Dothan, Alabama, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Hueytown, Alabama, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Mobile, Alabama, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Chandler, Arizona, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Green Valley, Arizona, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Bull Shoals, Arkansas, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Harrisburg, Arkansas, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Buena Park, California, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Cathedral City, California, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Chino, California, United States

GSK Investigational Site

Chula Vista, California, United States

Related trials

More studies on Albiglutide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.