Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT00936390·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Radiation Therapy With or Without Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

1,538

Locations

518

Results

Posted

Publications

1

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other types of radiation to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Androgens can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Androgen-deprivation therapy may lessen the amount of androgens made by the body. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy is more effective with or without androgen-deprivation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared with radiation therapy given together with androgen-deprivation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer.

Full detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Demonstrate an overall survival (OS) advantage in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy (RT) with versus without short-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Secondary * Determine whether the addition of ADT to dose-escalated RT versus RT alone improves clinical failures, biochemical failure by the "nadir +2", freedom from failure, rate of salvage ADT, and prostate cancer-specific mortality in these patients. * Estimate the magnitude of benefit of ADT with respect to OS in patients treated with different RT modalities (i.e., external-beam radiation therapy alone vs low-dose rate brachytherapy boost vs high-dose rate brachytherapy boost). * Compare acute and late treatment adverse events of these regimens and correlate these events with the presence or absence of pre-existing comorbidity as documented by the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 assessment. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, dose-escalation study of radiotherapy. Patients are stratified according to number of risk factors (1 vs 2-3), comorbidity (ACE-27 grade ≥ 2 vs \< 2), and radiotherapy (RT) modality (dose-escalated external-beam RT \[EBRT\] vs EBRT and low-dose rate brachytherapy boost vs EBRT and high-dose rate brachytherapy boost). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up periodically.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

bicalutamide

Administered orally at a dose of one 50 mg tablet per day, beginning within (before, same day as, or after) 10 days of the date of the first LHRH agonist (antagonist) therapy administration and continuing for a total duration of 6 months.

DRUG

flutamide

Administered orally at a dose of 250 mg (two 125-mg capsules) three times a day for a total daily dose of 750 mg, beginning within (before, same day as, or after) 10 days of with the date of the first LHRH agonist (antagonist) therapy administration and continuing for a total duration of 6 months.

DRUG

LHRH agonist (antagonist) therapy

LHRH agonist (antagonist) therapy consists of leuprolide, goserelin, buserelin, triptorelin, or degarelix. The manufacturer's instructions should be followed. The first administration occurs with the start of anti-androgen treatment 8 weeks prior to the start of RT. The total duration of LHRH agonist (antagonist) therapy is 6 months.

RADIATION

Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Brachytherapy is optional, at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients treated entirely via EBRT receive 79.2 Gy delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions. Patients who receive brachytherapy as a component of their RT receive 45 Gy EBRT in 1.8 Gy fractions. Low-dose brachytherapy boost occurs following the EBRT portion of treatment no more than 4 weeks following its completion.High-dose rate brachytherapy boost is delivered in 2 fractions separated by a minimum time span of 6 hours and the implant(s) may be performed during the EBRT portion of the treatment or within 1 week prior to its initiation or following its completion.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jul 10, 2009

  2. Study start

    Sep 2009

  3. Primary completion

    Oct 3, 2020

  4. Study completion

    Sep 4, 2025

  5. Results posted

    Oct 6, 2022

  6. Registry updated

    Mar 6, 2026

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Secondary outcomes

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Biochemical failure is defined as an increase of at least 2 ng/ml above the nadir PSA. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Percentage of Participants With Local Recurrence

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as clinical (palpable) suspicion of local recurrence \[this date is used\] confirmed by biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Percentage of Participants With Regional Recurrence

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years.

Regional recurrence is defined as the documented progression in pelvic lymph nodes. If discovered on image of the pelvis prompted by a biochemical failure, then the event date would be the date of documented biochemical failure.

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as metastatic disease documented by any method. If diagnosed on diagnostic imaging prompted by biochemical failure, then the event date will be the date of biochemical progression. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (competing risk), or death without failure (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Prostate Cancer (Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Prostate cancer specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Cause Other Than Prostate Cancer (Non-Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Non-prostate cancer specific mortality is defined as a death without evidence of prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. . Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Percentage of Participants Receiving Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Salvage (non-protocol) ADT administration is defined as the first administration of subsequent ADT (either LHRH agonist or anti-androgen) Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Salvage ADT rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of salvage ADT times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) by Radiation Therapy Modality

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Number of Participants With Acute Adverse Events

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years.

Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Acute adverse events are defined as occuring within 30 days of completion of radiation therapy.

Percentage of Participants With Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events

Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Late adverse events are defined as occurring more than 30 days after the end of radiation therapy. Failure is defined as grade 3 or higher late adverse event. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Pathologically (histologically) proven diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma, at intermediate risk for recurrence, within 180 days prior to registration as determined by having one or more of the following intermediate-risk features: Gleason score 7; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \>10 but ≤20; clinical stage T2b-T2c. * Patients previously diagnosed with low risk (Gleason score ≤ 6, clinical stage \< T2a, and PSA \< 10) prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance who are re-biopsied and found to have intermediate risk disease according to the protocol criteria are eligible for enrollment within 180 days of the repeat biopsy procedure. 2. Clinically negative lymph nodes as established by imaging (pelvic +/- abdominal CT or MRI), nodal sampling, or dissection within 60 days prior to registration, except as noted immediately below: * Patients with a single intermediate risk factor only do not require abdominopelvic imaging, but these studies may be obtained at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients with 2 or 3 risk factors are required to undergo pelvic +/- abdominal CT or MRI. * Patients with lymph nodes equivocal or questionable by imaging are eligible without biopsy if the nodes are ≤1.5 cm; any node larger than this on imaging will require negative biopsy for eligibility. 3. No evidence of bone metastases (M0) on bone scan within 60 days prior to registration. * Bone scan is not required for patients enrolled with a single intermediate risk factor only, but this scan may be obtained at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients with 2 or 3 risk factors will require a negative bone scan for eligibility. * Equivocal bone scan findings are allowed if plain film x-rays are negative for metastasis. 4. History/physical examination (to include, at a minimum, digital rectal examination of the prostate and examination of the skeletal system and abdomen, and formal comorbidity assessment via the ACE-27 instrument) within 60 days prior to registration. 5. Zubrod Performance Status 0-1 6. Age ≥ 18 7. Baseline serum PSA value performed with an FDA-approved assay (e.g., Abbott, Hybritech) within 60 days prior to registration * Study entry PSA must not be obtained during the following time frames: (1) 10-day period following prostate biopsy; (2) following initiation of ADT; (3) within 30 days after discontinuation of finasteride; or (4) within 90 days after discontinuation of dutasteride. 8. For patients undergoing brachytherapy only: complete blood count (CBC)/differential obtained within 60 days prior to registration, with adequate bone marrow function defined as follows: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,800 cells/mm3 * Platelets ≥ 100,000 cells/mm3 * Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥ 8.0 g/dl (Note: The use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb ≥ 8.0 g/dl is acceptable.) 9. Patient must be able to provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with Gleason Score ≥ 8; PSA \> 20; OR Clinical Stage ≥ T3 are ineligible for this trial. * Should findings of extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion be noted on prostate MRI, this study, if used, will not render patients ineligible for accrual to this protocol. Primary tumor staging for eligibility purposes is to be based on palpable or core biopsy evidence only with respect to extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle involvement. 2. Patients with all three intermediate risk factors who also have ≥ 50% of the number of their biopsy cores positive for cancer are ineligible for this trial. 3. Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) or hematological (e.g., leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma) malignancy unless disease free for a minimum of 5 years (prior diagnoses of carcinoma in situ are permitted) 4. Prior radical surgery (prostatectomy), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or cryosurgery for prostate cancer 5. Prior hormonal therapy, such as LHRH agonists (e.g., goserelin, leuprolide), antiandrogens (e.g., flutamide, bicalutamide), estrogens (e.g., DES), or bilateral orchiectomy 6. Use of finasteride within 30 days prior to registration 7. Use of dutasteride within 90 days prior to registration 8. Prior or concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer; prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is permitted. 9. Prior RT, including brachytherapy, to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of RT fields * Any patient undergoing brachytherapy must have transrectal ultrasound confirmation of prostate volume \<60 cc, American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) score ≤15 within 60 days of registration, and no history of prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP); prior TURP is permitted for patients who receive EBRT only) 10. Severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows: * Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months * Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months * Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration * Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy within 30 days before registration * Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects; note, however, that laboratory tests for liver function and coagulation parameters are not required for entry into this protocol. * Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) based upon current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition; note, however, that HIV testing is not required for entry into this protocol. While the treatment employed in this study is not significantly immunosuppressive, it is felt that a diagnosis of AIDS associated with prostate cancer is likely to impact this study's primary endpoint of overall survival. Patients who are HIV seropositive but do not meet criteria for diagnosis of AIDS are eligible for study participation. 11. Men who are sexually active with a woman of child-bearing potential and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception (e.g., surgical, barrier, medicinal) during protocol treatment and during the first 3 months after cessation of protocol treatment; this exclusion is necessary because the treatment involved in this study may be significantly teratogenic.

Study locations

518 registered sites.

Canada · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Fairbanks Memorial Hospital

Fairbanks, Alaska, United States

Arizona Center for Cancer Care-Peoria

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

21st Century Oncology-Scottsdale

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Arizona Oncology Services Foundation

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Arizona Oncology Associates-West Orange Grove

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Mercy Cancer Center-Hot Springs

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Auburn

Auburn, California, United States

Alta Bates Summit Medical Center-Herrick Campus

Berkeley, California, United States

Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center/Disney Family Cancer Center

Burbank, California, United States

Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Cameron Park

Cameron Park, California, United States

Mercy San Juan Medical Center

Carmichael, California, United States

Enloe Medical Center

Chico, California, United States

21st Century Oncology - El Segundo

El Segundo, California, United States

Fresno Cancer Center

Fresno, California, United States

Saint Agnes Medical Center

Fresno, California, United States

Marin General Hospital

Greenbrae, California, United States

Veterans Administration Long Beach Medical Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Memorial Medical Center

Modesto, California, United States

Kaiser Permanente Oakland-Broadway

Oakland, California, United States

Related trials

More studies on Degarelix.