Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT00975286·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

24-week Treatment With Lixisenatide in Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled With Metformin and Insulin Glargine

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

446

Locations

140

Results

Posted

Publications

6

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010), in comparison to placebo, as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine and metformin with or without thiazolidinediones (TZDs), over a period of 24 weeks of treatment. The primary objective is to assess the effects of lixisenatide in comparison to placebo, when added to insulin glargine and metformin, on glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction (absolute change) at Week 24. The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide on the percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than (\<) 7 percent (%) and less than or equal to (\<=) 6.5%, plasma glucose (fasting, postprandial during a standardized meal challenge test, 7-point self monitored profiles), body weight, insulin glargine doses, to evaluate safety and tolerability (including anti-lixisenatide antibody assessment), and to assess the impact on treatment satisfaction using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (state) (DTSQs) in the participating countries where it is validated.

Full detailed description

The study comprises 3 periods: * An up to 14-week screening period, which includes an up to 2-week screening phase and a 12-week run-in phase with introduction and titration of insulin glargine on top of metformin +/-TZDs. * At the end of the run-in phase, patients whose HbA1c (centralized assay) is greater than or equal to (\>=) 7% and less than or equal to (\<=) 9% and whose mean fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) calculated from the self measurements for the 7 days prior to Visit 12 (Week -1) is \<=140 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (7.8 millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]), would enter a 24-week double-blind randomized treatment period comparing lixisenatide to placebo (on top of insulin glargine + metformin +/- TZDs). * A 3-day safety follow up period. Maximum duration is of 39 weeks +/- 7 days.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Lixisenatide (AVE0010)

Self administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast.

DRUG

Placebo

Self administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast.

DRUG

Insulin glargine

Dose to be adjusted to maintain a fasting SMPG between 100 and 80 mg/dL (5.6 and 4.4 mmol/L), inclusive.

DEVICE

Pen auto-injector

Lantus® SoloStar® OptiClik®

DRUG

Metformin

Metformin to be continued at stable dose (at least 1.5 gram per day) up to Week 24.

DRUG

Thiazolidinedione (TZD)

TZD (either rosiglitazone or pioglitazone) if given, to be continued at stable dose up to Week 24.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Sep 11, 2009

  2. Study start

    Oct 2009

  3. Primary completion

    Aug 2011

  4. Study completion

    Aug 2011

  5. Results posted

    Oct 11, 2016

  6. Registry updated

    Oct 11, 2016

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Secondary outcomes

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24

Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Change From Baseline in Glucose Excursion at Week 24

Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the standardized meal test, before study drug administration. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Change From Baseline in Average 7-Point Self Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile at Week 24

Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

Patients recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime once in a week and the average value for the 7-time points was calculated. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Change From Baseline in Average Insulin Glargine Daily Dose at Week 24

Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

Time frame · Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

Time frame · Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During the Double-blind Period

Time frame · Baseline up to Week 24

Routine fasting SMPG, central laboratory FPG and HbA1c values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG and HbA1c were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG \>200 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c \>9%, from Week 8 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG \>180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) or HbA1c \>8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of Items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of DTSQ) at Week 24

Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. DTSQ: 8-item questionnaire to assess treatment satisfaction and patient perception of hyper and hypoglycemia. Each question (Q) scored on a Likert scale from 0 to 6. Six items (Q1 and 4-8; higher score = more satisfaction) measured treatment satisfaction and were summed to calculate treatment satisfaction score which ranged from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 36 (very satisfied). Two items (Q2 and 3), which were not included, measured perceived hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, respectively and lower scores represented good perceived blood glucose control. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria: \- Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year before screening visit, insufficiently controlled with insulin glargine and metformin Exclusion criteria: * HbA1c \<7% or greater than (\>)10% at screening * At the time of screening age \< legal age of majority * Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method * Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Metformin not at a stable dose of at least 1.5 gram per day for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit * Use of oral or injectable antidiabetic or hypoglycemic agents other than metformin, sulfonylurea (SU) and TZDs (for example, alpha glucosidase inhibitor, other glucagon like peptide-1 \[GLP-1\] receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-IV \[DPP-IV\] inhibitors, insulin etc.) within 3 months prior to the time of screening, use of weight loss drugs if not at a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit * History of hypoglycemia unawareness * Body Mass Index (BMI) less than or equal to (\<=) 20 kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2) * History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or genetic conditions that predispose to MTC (for example, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes) * History of metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis within 1 year prior to screening * Hemoglobinopathy or hemolytic anemia, blood or plasma products transfusion within 3 months prior to the time of screening * Within the last 6 months prior to screening: history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure requiring hospitalization * Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to the time of screening * Any clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram or vital signs at the time of screening that in the judgment of the Investigator or any sub investigator precludes safe completion of the study or constrains efficacy assessment such as active malignant tumor or other major systemic diseases, presence of clinically significant diabetic retinopathy or presence of macular edema likely to require laser treatment within the study period * Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension at the time of screening with a resting systolic or diastolic blood pressure \>180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or \>110 mmHg, respectively * Laboratory findings at the time of screening: amylase and/or lipase, alanine aminotransferase \>3 times upper limit of the normal (ULN) laboratory range; total bilirubin: \>1.5 times ULN (except in case of Gilbert's syndrome); hemoglobin \<11 gram/deciliter and/or neutrophils \<1500 per cubic millimeter (mm\^3) and/or platelets \<100 000/mm\^3; positive test for Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody, positive serum pregnancy test in females of childbearing potential; and calcitonin \>=20 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL) (5.9 picomole per milliliter \[pmol/L\]) * Patients who are considered by the Investigator or any sub investigator as inappropriate for this study for any reason (for example, impossibility to meet specific protocol requirements, such as scheduled visits, being able to do self-injections, likelihood of requiring treatment during the screening phase and treatment phase with drugs not permitted by the clinical study protocol, patient being investigator or any sub investigator, pharmacist, study coordinator, other study staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol etc.) * Use of systemic glucocorticoids (excluding topical application or inhaled forms) for one week or more within 3 months prior to the time of screening * Use of any investigational drug within 3 months prior to screening * Renal impairment defined with serum creatinine \> 1.4 mg/dL in women and \> 1.5 mg/dL in men * History of hypersensitivity to insulin glargine or to any of the excipients * Clinically relevant history of gastrointestinal disease associated with prolonged nausea and vomiting, including (but not limited to): gastroparesis, unstable (that is, worsening) and not controlled (that is, prolonged nausea and vomiting) gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring medical treatment, within 6 months prior to the time of screening * Any previous treatment with lixisenatide (for example, participation in a previous study with lixisenatide) * Allergic reaction to any GLP-1 receptor agonist in the past (for example, exenatide, liraglutide) or to metacresol * Additional exclusion criteria during or at the end of the run-in phase before randomization: informed consent withdrawal (patient who was not willing to continue or failed to return), mean fasting SMPG calculated from the self-measurements for the 7 days prior to Visit 12 (Week -1) was \>140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) and HbA1c measured at Visit 12 (Week -1) is \<7% or \>9%, amylase and/or lipase \> 3 times the ULN at Visit 12 (Week -1), patients with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) above the threshold value described for rescue (that is, FPG \>240 mg/dL \[13.3 mmol/L\]), patients with any adverse event, which, by the judgment of the Investigator precludes the inclusion in the double-blind randomized treatment phase, and lack of compliance to protocol or to insulin glargine treatment during the run-in phase

Study locations

140 registered sites.

Argentina · Brazil · Canada · Chile · Colombia · Czechia · Denmark · Estonia · France · Germany · Hungary · India · Israel · Italy · Malaysia · Mexico · Netherlands · Poland · Puerto Rico · Romania · Russia · South Africa · Sweden · Taiwan · Ukraine · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840223

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840206

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840201

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840212

Mountain Home, Arkansas, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840215

Concord, California, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840214

Greenbrae, California, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840221

Orlando, Florida, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840211

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840230

Hyattsville, Maryland, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840209

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840219

Brighton, Michigan, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840231

Sea Girt, New Jersey, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840208

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840225

Mentor, Ohio, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840222

Portland, Oregon, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840202

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840229

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840205

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840210

Dallas, Texas, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840217

Houston, Texas, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840228

Houston, Texas, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840213

Plano, Texas, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840227

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 032204

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 23564915Riddle MC, Forst T, Aronson R, Sauque-Reyna L, Souhami E, Silvestre L, Ping L, Rosenstock J. Adding once-daily lixisenatide for type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with newly initiated and continuously titrated basal insulin glargine: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study (GetGoal-Duo 1). Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2497-503. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2462. Epub 2013 Apr 5.PMID 36809495Yao J, Zhang M, Zhang X, Zhang J. Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Duration on the Efficacy and Safety of Add-on Lixisenatide in Asian Individuals Receiving Basal Insulin: A Pooled Analysis. Diabetes Ther. 2023 Apr;14(4):653-669. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01369-6. Epub 2023 Feb 21.PMID 31956422Davidson JA, Stager W, Paranjape S, Berria R, Leiter LA. Achieving postprandial glucose control with lixisenatide improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes on basal insulin: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Jan 14;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s40842-019-0088-5. eCollection 2020.PMID 29974618Rosenstock J, Handelsman Y, Vidal J, Ampudia Blasco FJ, Giorgino F, Liu M, Perfetti R, Meier JJ. Propensity-score-matched comparative analyses of simultaneously administered fixed-ratio insulin glargine 100 U and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) vs sequential administration of insulin glargine and lixisenatide in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2821-2829. doi: 10.1111/dom.13462. Epub 2018 Aug 13.PMID 25130920Charbonnel B, Bertolini M, Tinahones FJ, Domingo MP, Davies M. Lixisenatide plus basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):880-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 18.PMID 23628617Riddle MC, Aronson R, Home P, Marre M, Niemoeller E, Miossec P, Ping L, Ye J, Rosenstock J. Adding once-daily lixisenatide for type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by established basal insulin: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison (GetGoal-L). Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2489-96. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2454. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Lixisenatide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.