Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT01283542·Phase 2·INTERVENTIONAL

Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide LAR (Long Acting Release) on the Treatment of Patients With Clinically Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenoma.

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 2

Enrollment

20

Locations

7

Results

Posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This study assessed pasireotide LAR efficacy on patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas concerning tumor growth.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Pasireotide LAR

20 and 40 mg of powder in vials and 2 mL of vehicle in ampoules (for reconstitution) administered as a depot intragluteal IM (intramuscular) injection

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jan 26, 2011

  2. Study start

    Nov 26, 2012

  3. Primary completion

    Sep 12, 2017

  4. Study completion

    Sep 12, 2017

  5. Results posted

    Apr 26, 2019

  6. Registry updated

    Apr 26, 2019

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Percentage of Participants With Non-functioning Pituitary Adenomas (NFPA) Who Achieve Tumor Volume Reduction of at Least 20% After 24 Weeks (FAS)

Time frame · Baseline up to 24 weeks

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility.The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor. A change ≥ 20% in the original volume of the tumor was considered to be clinically significant. Evaluable participants required tumor volume assessment at baseline and at week 24.

Secondary outcomes

Tumor Volume Main Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 4, 12, 24

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Tumor Volume in Extension Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 48, 72, 96

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Tumor Volume Change From Baseline in Main Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 4, 12, 24

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Tumor Volume Change From Baseline in Extension Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 48, 72, 96

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Tumor Volume Percent Change From Baseline in Main Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 4, 12, 24

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Tumor Volume Percent Change From Baseline in Extension Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 48, 72, 96

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Percentage of Patients Achieving Tumour Volume Reduction in Main Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 4, 12, 24

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Percentage of Patients Achieving Tumour Volume Reduction of at Least ≥ 20% in Main Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 4, 12, 24

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Percentage of Patients Achieving Tumour Volume Reduction in Extension Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 48, 72, 96

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Percentage of Patients Achieving Tumour Volume Reduction of at Least ≥ 20% in Extension Phase (FAS)

Time frame · baseline to week 48, 72, 96

Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Non-functioning pituitary adenoma ≥ 1cm, patients without any previous treatment for the tumor * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who required a surgical intervention for relief of any sign or symptom associated with tumor compression * Previous pituitary surgery * Previous medical treatment for pituitary tumor * Patients who had received pituitary irradiation within 10 years prior to randomization * Prolactin (PRL) levels \> 100 ng/mL. PRL evaluation should have been performed with diluted samples to ensure "hook effect." was avoided * Patients who presented prolactinomas, acromegaly or Cushing's disease * Patients with compression of the optic chiasm causing acute clinically significant visual field defects

Study locations

7 registered sites.

Brazil. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Novartis Investigative Site

Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Novartis Investigative Site

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Novartis Investigative Site

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Novartis Investigative Site

Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Novartis Investigative Site

Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Pasireotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.