Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT01396213·Phase 2·INTERVENTIONAL

A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Larazotide Acetate for the Treatment of Celiac Disease

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 2

Enrollment

342

Locations

62

Results

Not posted

Publications

1

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2B study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Larazotide Acetate in the treatment of patients with celiac disease who have persistent symptoms despite being on a gluten-free diet.

Full detailed description

This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2B study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different doses (0.5, 1 and 2 mg TID) of Larazotide Acetate as an adjunct to gluten-free diet in the treatment of patients with celiac disease (CD). The diagnosis of CD must have been established by jejunal biopsy as well as serology at some point in time prior to entry into the study. Patients must have symptoms despite being on a gluten-free diet as defined by a celiac disease domain of the gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale equal to or more than 2.0.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Larazotide Acetate

gelatin capsule

DRUG

placebo

gelatin capsule

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jul 18, 2011

  2. Study start

    Nov 7, 2011

  3. Primary completion

    Aug 20, 2013

  4. Study completion

    Aug 20, 2013

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Sep 20, 2017

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Assess the efficacy of larazotide acetate versus placebo for the treatment of celiac disease in adults as an adjunct to a gluten-free diet

Time frame · CeD GSRS was completed weekly Baseline through the end of 12-week double-blind treatment period.

The primary efficacy endpoint was average on-treatment (Baseline to Week 12) score of theCeliac Disease Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (CeD GSRS).

Secondary outcomes

Assess the safety and tolerability of larazotide acetate in subjects with active celiac disease

Time frame · Up to 12 weeks

Safety endpoints assessed in this study were adverse events, vital signs, physical examination results, clinical laboratory test results, concomitant medication usage and ECG results

Validate a CeD PRO diary instrument in subjects with celiac disease

Time frame · The CeD PRO was administered daily throughout the study.

The CeD PRO is a 12-item questionnaire that was developed to assess symptom severity in clinical trials in subjects with celiac disease. Items in the questionnaire were formulated based on one-on-one interviews with subjects with celiac disease and thus reflect the symptoms that subjects consider part of their celiac disease experience. Subjects rated their symptom severity on an 11-point (0-10) scale. Symptoms included abdominal cramping, abdominal pain, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, gas, loose stools, nausea, vomiting, headache, and tiredness. The questionnaire was designed as a self-administered daily diary, to be completed at the same time each day, and required \< 10 minutes to complete.

Compare various efficacy endpoints during 12 weeks of double-blind treatment

Time frame · GSRS - weekly; BSFS - daily; CGA - screening, baseline, Week 12 and follow-up visits; CeD-QoL and SF12v2 - start of placebo run-in, Week 12 and follow-up visits; CD and CFDCQ - follow-up visit.

Additional efficacy assessments comprised a variety of known scales used for evaluating subjects with celiac disease, including the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS), Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), Short Form 12 health survey Version 2 (SF12v2), Celiac Disease Quality of Life (CeD-QoL) scale, and the Clinical Global Assessment (CGA). A Gluten-Free Diet Compliance Questionnaire (GFDCQ) and Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT) were also included to assess compliance with the gluten-free diet.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female adults with biopsy proven and serology-confirmed celiac disease on a gluten-free diet for at least 12 months * measurable serology at screening * CeD GSRS score of ≥ 2.0 prior to randomization * experiencing symptoms (ie, diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, or stomachache) * willing to maintain current diet gluten-free diet throughout the duration of the study. Exclusion Criteria: * refractory celiac disease or severe complications of celiac disease (eg, EATL, ulcerative jejunitis, perforation, etc.) * chronic active GI disease other than celiac disease * diabetes (Type 1 or 2) or other autoimmune disease that might interfere with the conduct of the study * hemoglobin value \< 8.5 g/dL

Study locations

62 registered sites.

Canada · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Facility not named

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Facility not named

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Facility not named

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Facility not named

Oceanside, California, United States

Facility not named

Orange, California, United States

Facility not named

San Francisco, California, United States

Facility not named

Santa Monica, California, United States

Facility not named

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Facility not named

Denver, Colorado, United States

Facility not named

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Facility not named

Edgewater, Florida, United States

Facility not named

Orlando, Florida, United States

Facility not named

Summerfield, Florida, United States

Facility not named

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Facility not named

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Facility not named

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Facility not named

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Facility not named

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Facility not named

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Facility not named

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Facility not named

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Facility not named

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Facility not named

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Facility not named

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Related trials

More studies on Larazotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.