Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT01709110·Phase 4·INTERVENTIONAL

VERtebral Fracture Treatment Comparisons in Osteoporotic Women

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 4

Enrollment

1,366

Locations

103

Results

Posted

Publications

5

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The primary purpose of participation in this study is to answer whether teriparatide is superior to risedronate in reducing the occurrence of new vertebral fractures during 24 months of therapy.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Teriparatide

Administered SC

DRUG

Risedronate

Administered orally

DRUG

Placebo

Teriparatide arm placebo administered orally. Risedronate arm placebo administered SC.

DRUG

Calcium

Administered orally

DRUG

Vitamin D

Administered orally

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Oct 17, 2012

  2. Study start

    Oct 2012

  3. Primary completion

    Jul 2016

  4. Study completion

    Jul 2016

  5. Results posted

    Jan 23, 2018

  6. Registry updated

    Sep 23, 2019

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Proportion of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures

Time frame · Baseline through 24 Months

The incidence of new vertebral fractures was assessed by quantitative vertebral morphometry measurements (QM) with qualitative visual semiquantitative grading (SQ) confirmation. A new vertebral fracture was diagnosed in a vertebra that was non-fractured at the baseline radiological examination. It was defined as a loss of vertebral body height of at least 20% and 4 mm from the baseline radiograph by vertebral QM, based upon placement of six points by a trained, central reader. Any fractures identified by QM were confirmed using SQ: if the vertebral body also had an increase of one or more severity grade, it was considered an incident vertebral fracture.

Secondary outcomes

Proportion of Participants With Pooled New and Worsening Vertebral Fractures

Time frame · Baseline through 24 Months

Worsening of a pre-existing fracture was considered if the decrease in vertebral height was at least one severity grade in the semi-quantitative assessment, confirmed by a trained central reader, where vertebrae were graded as normal (SQ0) or as with mild (SQ1), moderate (SQ2), or severe (SQ3) fractures, defined as \~20 to 25% (mild), \~25 to 40% (moderate) or \~40% or more (severe) decrease in anterior, central, or posterior vertebral height (T4 to L4).

Proportion of Participants With Pooled Clinical Vertebral and Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures

Time frame · Baseline through 24 Months

A clinical vertebral fracture was defined as a new or worsening vertebral fracture, confirmed by radiography, that was associated with signs and symptoms highly suggestive of a vertebral fracture. All non-vertebral fractures that occurred and were diagnosed between visits required the confirmation by the site investigators after evaluating the original x-ray film(s), the radiology or surgical report. For clinical vertebral fractures, the final confirmation of the diagnosis required the centralized evaluation by a trained, independent reader.

Proportion of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures

Time frame · Baseline through 24 Months

A non-vertebral fracture is a fracture at any of the following non-vertebral sites: clavicle, scapula, ribs, sternum, sacrum, coccyx, humerus, radius, ulna, carpus, pelvis, hip, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, ankle, calcaneus, tarsus, and metatarsal. Non-vertebral fractures were determined by direct questioning at each visit, and confirmed by the site investigators by x-ray, radiology or surgical report. Fractures resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving object were not considered fragility fractures but traumatic fractures.

Proportion of Participants With Major Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures

Time frame · Baseline through 24 Months

A major non-vertebral fracture is a fracture at any of the following non-vertebral sites hip, radius, humerus, ribs, pelvis, tibia and femur. Non-vertebral fractures were determined by direct questioning at each visit, and confirmed by the site investigators by x-ray, radiology or surgical report. Fractures resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving.

Proportion of Participants With New Moderate and/or Severe Vertebral Fractures

Time frame · Baseline through 24 Months

Vertebrae were graded as moderate (SQ2), or severe (SQ3) fractures, based on \~25 to 40% (moderate) or \~40% or more (severe) decrease in anterior, central, or posterior vertebral height (T4 through L4).

Proportion of Participants With New Multiple (2 or More) Vertebral Fractures

Time frame · Baseline through 24 Months

Proportion of Participants With Pooled Fragility and Traumatic Non-Vertebral Fractures

Time frame · Baseline through 24 Months

Traumatic fractures were considered if resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving object.

Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in Height

Time frame · Baseline, 24 Months

Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in Back Pain Using an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale

Time frame · Baseline, 24 Months

Participants rated the worst back pain during the 24 hours preceding the visit at baseline and each post-baseline visit. An 11-point numerical back pain rating scale (rated from 0 = no back pain to 10 = worst possible back pain) was used.

Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in the European Quality of Life Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] (UK)

Time frame · Baseline, 24 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument completed on five dimensions to measure health-related quality of life. The profile allowed participants to rate their health state in five health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a five level scale (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to/extreme problems). The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.59 to 1.0. A higher score indicates better health state.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
45 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, as defined by low bone mineral density (BMD), i.e. anterior-posterior lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck BMD ≥1.5 standard deviations below the average BMD for young, healthy, non-Hispanic, Caucasian women * A minimum of 2 moderate or 1 severe vertebral fragility fractures (confirmed by central reader) were required Exclusion Criteria: * Increased risk of osteosarcoma * History of unresolved skeletal diseases that affect bone metabolism * History of atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral fractures * Abnormally high or low calcium levels * Abnormally high parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels * Severe vitamin D deficiency * Abnormal thyroid function not corrected by therapy * History of malignant neoplasms in the last 5 years * Active liver disease, clinical jaundice * Significant impairment of hepatic or renal function * History of nephro- or urolithiasis * Previous or planned kypho- or vertebroplasty * Active or risk for osteonecrosis of the jaw * Active or recent history of upper gastrointestinal disorders * Unable to stand or sit in the upright position for at least 30 minutes

Study locations

103 registered sites.

Argentina · Austria · Belgium · Brazil · Canada · Czechia · France · Germany · Greece · Hungary · Italy · Poland · Puerto Rico · Spain · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Concord, California, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Fresno, California, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Laguna Hills, California, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Lancaster, California, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Tustin, California, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Orlando, Florida, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Gainesville, Georgia, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Evansville, Indiana, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Topeka, Kansas, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Detroit, Michigan, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Clifton, New Jersey, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Freehold, New Jersey, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Bend, Oregon, United States

For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician.

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 32474650Body JJ, Marin F, Kendler DL, Zerbini CAF, Lopez-Romero P, Moricke R, Casado E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Stepan JJ, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Geusens P. Efficacy of teriparatide compared with risedronate on FRAX(R)-defined major osteoporotic fractures: results of the VERO clinical trial. Osteoporos Int. 2020 Oct;31(10):1935-1942. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05463-4. Epub 2020 May 30.PMID 32157334Geusens P, Kendler DL, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lopez-Romero P, Marin F. Distribution of Prevalent and Incident Vertebral Fractures and Their Association with Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women in the Teriparatide Versus Risedronate VERO Clinical Trial. Calcif Tissue Int. 2020 Jun;106(6):646-654. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00683-6. Epub 2020 Mar 10.PMID 30659410Minisola S, Marin F, Kendler DL, Geusens P, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Casado E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Stepan JJ, Lespessailles E, Moericke R, Bagur A, Lakatos P, Lopez-Romero P, Body JJ. Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and the risk of fractures in the teriparatide versus risedronate VERO clinical trial. Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0561-x.PMID 29329484Geusens P, Marin F, Kendler DL, Russo LA, Zerbini CA, Minisola S, Body JJ, Lespessailles E, Greenspan SL, Bagur A, Stepan JJ, Lakatos P, Casado E, Moericke R, Lopez-Romero P, Fahrleitner-Pammer A. Effects of Teriparatide Compared with Risedronate on the Risk of Fractures in Subgroups of Postmenopausal Women with Severe Osteoporosis: The VERO Trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 May;33(5):783-794. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3384. Epub 2018 Feb 9.PMID 29129436Kendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Greenspan SL, Zikan V, Bagur A, Malouf-Sierra J, Lakatos P, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Body JJ, Geusens P, Moricke R, Lopez-Romero P. Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):230-240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Teriparatide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.