Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT01794143·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Major Glycemia-lowering Medications for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

7,850

Locations

36

Results

Posted

Publications

12

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The GRADE Study is a pragmatic, unmasked clinical trial that will compare commonly used diabetes medications, when combined with metformin, on glycemia-lowering effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Sulfonylurea (glimepiride)

Used in accordance with labeling and/or usual practice.

DRUG

DPP-4 inhibitor (sitagliptin)

Used in accordance with labeling and/or usual practice

DRUG

GLP-1 receptor agonist (liraglutide)

Used in accordance with labeling and/or usual practice.

DRUG

Insulin (glargine)

Used in accordance with labeling and/or usual practice.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Feb 18, 2013

  2. Study start

    May 2013

  3. Primary completion

    Apr 30, 2021

  4. Study completion

    Apr 30, 2021

  5. Results posted

    Feb 10, 2026

  6. Registry updated

    Feb 10, 2026

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Time to HbA1c>=7%, While Receiving Metformin and the Randomly Assigned Glucose-lowering Study Medication

Time frame · Quarterly for 4 to 7 years

The primary metabolic outcome is the time to primary failure defined as an HbA1c\>=7% (53mmol/mol), subsequently confirmed, after addition of randomly assigned glucose-lowering medication at baseline.

HbA1c>=7%, While Receiving Metformin and the Randomly Assigned Glucose-lowering Study Medication

Time frame · Quarterly, 4-7 years

Number of participants who reached primary failure defined as an HbA1c\>=7% (53mmol/mol), subsequently confirmed, after addition of randomly assigned glucose-lowering medication at baseline.

Secondary outcomes

Time to HbA1c>7.5%, While Receiving Metformin and the Randomly Assigned Glucose-lowering Study Medication.

Time frame · Quarterly, 4-6 years

The secondary metabolic outcome is time to HbA1c\>7.5% (58 mmol/mol), confirmed, after addition of randomly assigned glucose-lowering medication at baseline.

HbA1c>7.5%, While Receiving Metformin and the Randomly Assigned Glucose-lowering Study Medication.

Time frame · Quarterly for 4 to 7 years

Number of participants who reached primary failure defined as an HbA1c\>7.5% (58 mmol/mol), confirmed, after addition of randomly assigned glucose-lowering medication at baseline.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
30 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Men or women diagnosed with diabetes at age ≥ 30 years (≥ 20 for American Indians) 2. Duration of diagnosed diabetes \< 10 years 3. HbA1c criteria (at final run-in visit, \~2 weeks prior to randomization): 6.8-8.5% 4. Taking a daily dose of ≥ 1000 mg metformin for a minimum of 8 weeks at final run-in 5. Willingness to administer daily subcutaneous injections, take a second diabetes drug after randomization, potentially initiate insulin and intensify insulin therapy if study metabolic goals are not met, perform self-monitoring of blood glucose 6. Fluent in either English or Spanish 7. A negative pregnancy test for all females of childbearing potential (i.e. pre-menopausal, and not surgically sterile) 8. Provision of signed and dated informed consent prior to any study procedures Exclusion Criteria: 1. Suspected type 1 diabetes (lean with polyuria, polydipsia, and weight loss with little response to metformin) or "secondary" diabetes due to specific causes (e.g. previously diagnosed monogenic syndromes, pancreatic surgery, pancreatitis) 2. Current or previous (within past 6 months) treatment with any diabetes drug/glucose-lowering medication other than metformin (limited use of no longer than seven days is allowed, for example during hospitalization) 3. More than 10 years of treatment with metformin at time of randomization screening 4. History of intolerance or allergy or other contraindications to any of the proposed study medications 5. Resides in the same household with another GRADE study participant 6. Current need for any specific glucose-lowering medications solely for other conditions, for example for polycystic ovary syndrome 7. Symptomatic hyperglycemia requiring immediate therapy during screening or run-in, in the judgment of the physician 8. A life-threatening event within 30 days prior to screening or currently planned major surgery 9. Any major cardiovascular event in previous year, including history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular procedure such as coronary artery or peripheral bypass grafting, stent placements (peripheral or coronary) or angioplasty. 10. Plans for pregnancy during the course of the study for women of child-bearing potential 11. History of or planning bariatric surgery, including banding procedures or surgical gastric and/or intestinal bypass (if banding removed, may be considered eligible after 1 year) 12. History of congestive heart failure (NYHA 3 or greater) 13. History of pancreatitis 14. History of cancer, other than non-melanoma skin cancer, that required therapy in the 5 years prior to randomization 15. Personal or family history of MEN-2 or family history of medullary thyroid cancer 16. Estimated GFR (eGFR) \<30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or end stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy 17. History of severe liver disease or acute hepatitis or ALT \> 3 times upper limit of normal 18. Current alcoholism or excessive alcohol intake 19. Previous organ transplant 20. Treatment with oral or systemic glucocorticoids (other than short-term treatment, for example for poison ivy) or disease likely to require periodic or regular glucocorticoid therapy (inhaled steroids are allowed) 21. Treatment with atypical antipsychotics 22. History of hemolytic anemia, chronic transfusion requirement, or other condition rendering HbA1c results unreliable as indicator of chronic glucose levels, or hematocrit \<35 for males and \<33 for females 23. Clinically or medically unstable with expected survival \<1 year 24. Unwillingness to permit sites to contact the PCP to communicate information about the study and the participant's data 25. No non-study PCP or inability to identify such a PCP (who will provide non-study care) by the time of final run-in 26. Participation in another interventional clinical trial 27. Previous randomization in the GRADE study 28. In the opinion of the principal investigator (PI), any other factor, including language barrier, likely to limit compliance with the protocol

Study locations

36 registered sites.

United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

University of Alabama-Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Southwestern American Indian Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Veterans Medical Research Foundation, San Diego (San Diego VA)

San Diego, California, United States

University of Colorado

Denver, Colorado, United States

Yale University School of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

South Florida VA Foundation (Miami VA)

Miami, Florida, United States

Atlanta VA Medical Center

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Kaiser Permanente of Georgia

Duluth, Georgia, United States

Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (VA Pacific Islands)

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Indiana University School of Medicine

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

MedStar Health Research Institute

Hyattsville, Maryland, United States

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

International Diabetes Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

University of Nebraska

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

University of New Mexico School of Medicine

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

State University of New York (SUNY)-Downstate Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Columbia University Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center

New York, New York, United States

Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

The Bronx, New York, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 36631123Butera NM, Zeng D, Heiss G, Cai J. Modeling longitudinal change in biomarkers using data from a complex survey sampling design: An application to the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Stat Med. 2023 Feb 28;42(5):632-655. doi: 10.1002/sim.9635. Epub 2023 Jan 11.PMID 34786739Butera NM, Zeng D, Green Howard A, Gordon-Larsen P, Cai J. A doubly robust method to handle missing multilevel outcome data with application to the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Stat Med. 2022 Feb 20;41(4):769-785. doi: 10.1002/sim.9260. Epub 2021 Nov 16.PMID 36549905Ghosh A, Chan W, Younes N, Davis BR. A Dynamic Risk Model for Multitype Recurrent Events. Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 6;192(4):621-631. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac213.PMID 31647326Lachin JM, Bebu I. Closed testing of each group versus the others combined in a multiple group analysis. Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;17(1):77-86. doi: 10.1177/1740774519879932. Epub 2019 Oct 24.PMID 29956365Bebu I, Lachin JM. Properties of composite time to first event versus joint marginal analyses of multiple outcomes. Stat Med. 2018 Nov 30;37(27):3918-3930. doi: 10.1002/sim.7849. Epub 2018 Jun 28.PMID 26336199Lachin JM, Bebu I. Application of the Wei-Lachin multivariate one-directional test to multiple event-time outcomes. Clin Trials. 2015 Dec;12(6):627-33. doi: 10.1177/1740774515601027. Epub 2015 Sep 2.PMID 25329662Lachin JM. Applications of the Wei-Lachin multivariate one-sided test for multiple outcomes on possibly different scales. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 17;9(10):e108784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108784. eCollection 2014.PMID 26400875Lachin JM. Fallacies of last observation carried forward analyses. Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):161-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774515602688. Epub 2015 Sep 22.PMID 40986645Pop-Busui R, Rosin SP, Butera NM, Krause-Steinrauf H, Abou Assi H, Garg RK, Inzucchi SE, Katona A, McGill JB, Mudaliar S, Schade DS, Seaquist ER, Tiktin M, Soliman EZ, Green JB; GRADE Research Group. Differences in Prevalence and Incidence of Electrocardiogram Abnormalities and Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy Among Randomized Glucose-Lowering Treatments in Early Type 2 Diabetes: The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes (GRADE) Cohort. Diabetes Care. 2025 Nov 1;48(11):1960-1970. doi: 10.2337/dc25-1087.PMID 40751289Presley CA, Butera NM, Krause-Steinrauf H, Desouza CV, Hollander PA, Hoogendoorn CJ, Lagari VS, Legowski EA, Martin CL, Rasouli N, Gonzalez JS, Cherrington AL. Lack of Association of Emotional Distress With Insulin Initiation in the GRADE Randomized Diabetes Comparative Effectiveness Trial. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025 Aug;51(4):382-393. doi: 10.1177/26350106251361363. Epub 2025 Aug 1.PMID 40424051Hsia DS, Younes N, Ghosh A, Kazemi EJ, Krause-Steinrauf H, Buse JB, Baker C, Brown-Friday J, Diaz E, Diner J, Groessl EJ, Legowski EA, Mariash CN, Waltje AH, Wexler DJ, Martin CL; GRADE Research Group. Association of Hospitalizations With Randomized Glycemia-Lowering Treatment in GRADE. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jul 1;48(7):1288-1294. doi: 10.2337/dc24-2839.PMID 40388190Luchsinger JA, Rosin SP, Kazemi EJ, Younes N, Suratt CE, Fattaleh BN, Florez HJ, Gonzalez JS, Hollander P, Hox SH, Kuo S, Lee MS, Martens T, Pop-Busui R, Seaquist ER, Waltje AH, Barzilay JI; GRADE Research Group. Glucose-Lowering Medications, Glycemia, and Cognitive Outcomes: The GRADE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jul 1;185(7):778-787. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1189.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Liraglutide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.