DRUG
Safety and Efficacy Study of Enzalutamide Plus Leuprolide in Patients With Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer (EMBARK)
Status
Active, not recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,068
Locations
255
Results
Posted
Publications
11
Study summary
What the protocol is testing.
The purpose of this study is to assess enzalutamide plus leuprolide in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer progressing after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy or both. The randomized / blinded portion of the study is now completed following primary endpoint analyses. The study remains ongoing in open label format.
Interventions
Treatment arms and agents.
DRUG
Placebo (No longer applicable in Open Label study period)
Sugar pill to mimic enzalutamide
DRUG
Leuprolide Open Label
Timeline
From registration to results.
First posted
Dec 18, 2014
Study start
Dec 17, 2014
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2023
Study completion
Sep 19, 2026
Results posted
Mar 25, 2024
Registry updated
Jul 9, 2026
Outcomes
What the study measures.
Primary outcomes
Metastasis-free Survival (MFS) Compared Between Enzalutamide Plus Leuprolide and Placebo Plus Leuprolide
Time frame · From randomization until radiographic progression or death without radiographic progression, whichever occurred first (up to Month 98 when at least 197 MFS events occurred among the 3 treatment groups)
MFS was defined as the duration of time in months between randomization and the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression by central imaging or death without radiographic progression, whichever occurred first. Radiographic progression for soft tissue disease was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Radiographic progression for bone disease was defined as the appearance of 1 or more metastatic lesions on bone scan (a bone scan assesses 5 regions of the skeleton, including skull, thorax, spine, pelvis, and extremities). Confirmation with a second imaging modality (plain film, computed tomography \[CT\], or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) was to be required when bone lesions were found in a single region on the bone scan. Appearance of metastatic lesions in 2 or more of the 5 regions on a bone scan was not to require confirmation with a second imaging modality.
Secondary outcomes
Metastasis-free Survival (MFS) Compared Between Enzalutamide Monotherapy and Placebo Plus Leuprolide
Time frame · From randomization until radiographic progression or death without radiographic progression, whichever occurred first (up to Month 98 when at least 197 MFS events occurred among the 3 treatment groups)
MFS was defined as the duration of time in months between randomization and the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression by central imaging or death without radiographic progression, whichever occurred first. Radiographic progression for soft tissue disease was defined by RECIST 1.1. Radiographic progression for bone disease was defined as the appearance of 1 or more metastatic lesions on bone scan (a bone scan assesses 5 regions of the skeleton, including skull, thorax, spine, pelvis, and extremities). Confirmation with a second imaging modality (plain film, CT, or MRI) was to be required when bone lesions were found in a single region on the bone scan. Appearance of metastatic lesions in 2 or more of the 5 regions on a bone scan was not to require confirmation with a second imaging modality.
Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
Time frame · From randomization until first PSA progression (up to Month 98)
Time to PSA progression was defined as the time in months from randomization to the date of the first PSA value demonstrating progression, while participants were on study treatment, which was subsequently confirmed at least 3 weeks later. PSA progression date was defined as the date that a ≥25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥2 micrograms per liter (μg/L) (2 nanograms per milliliter \[ng/mL\]) above the nadir (or baseline for participants with no PSA decline by Week 25) that was confirmed by a second consecutive value at least 3 weeks later. For participants who had suspended treatment at Week 37 and later reinitiated treatment, baseline was reset as the last PSA assessment prior to or on the date of reinitiation of treatment.
Time to First Use of New Antineoplastic Therapy
Time frame · From randomization until first use of new antineoplastic therapy (up to Month 98)
Time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy was defined as the time in months from randomization to first use of new antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame · From randomization until death due to any cause (up to Month 98 when at least 197 MFS events occurred among the 3 treatment groups)
Overall survival was defined as the time in months between randomization and death due to any cause.
Time to Distant Metastasis
Time frame · From randomization until the earliest objective evidence of distant soft tissue metastases or metastatic bone disease (up to Month 98)
The time to distant metastasis was defined as the time in months from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of distant soft tissue metastases or metastatic bone disease by blinded independent central review (BICR).
Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) at 36 Weeks on Study Drug
Time frame · At Week 36
Undetectable PSA at 36 weeks was serum PSA levels \<0.2 ng/mL at Week 36. Percentage of participants with undetectable PSA at 36 weeks on study drug was calculated as the number of participants with undetectable PSA at Week 36 divided by the number of participants with PSA values at Week 36, and multiplied by 100.
Percentage of Participants Who Remained Treatment-free 2 Years After Suspension of Study Treatment at Week 37 Due to Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA)
Time frame · From randomization until 2 years after Week 37 (up to Month 34)
Undetectable PSA at 36 weeks was serum PSA levels \<0.2 ng/mL at Week 36. At Week 37, study treatment was suspended for participants whose PSA values were undetectable (\<0.2 ng/mL) at Week 36 as determined by the central laboratory. Study treatment may have been suspended only once (at Week 37) due to undetectable PSA and was reinitiated if subsequent central laboratory PSA values increased to ≥2.0 ng/mL for participants with prior prostatectomy or ≥5.0 ng/mL for participants without prostatectomy. Percentage of participants who remained treatment-free 2 years after suspension of study treatment at Week 37 was calculated as the number of participants who remained treatment-free 2 years after suspension of study treatment at Week 37 divided by the number of participants with treatment suspension and multiplied by 100.
Percentage of Participants With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) 2 Years After Suspension of Treatment at Week 37 Due to Undetectable PSA
Time frame · From randomization until 2 years after Week 37 (up to Month 34)
Undetectable PSA at 36 weeks was serum PSA levels \<0.2 ng/mL at Week 36. At Week 37, study treatment was suspended for participants whose PSA values were undetectable (\<0.2 ng/mL) at Week 36 as determined by the central laboratory. Study treatment may have been suspended only once (at Week 37) due to undetectable PSA and was reinitiated if subsequent central laboratory PSA values increased to ≥2.0 ng/mL for participants with prior prostatectomy or ≥5.0 ng/mL for participants without prostatectomy. Percentage of participants with undetectable PSA 2 years after suspension of treatment at Week 37 due to undetectable PSA was calculated as the number of participants with undetectable PSA 2 years after suspension of treatment at Week 37 due to undetectable PSA divided by the number of participants with treatment suspension and multiplied by 100.
Time to Resumption of Any Hormonal Therapy Following Suspension at Week 37 Due to Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA)
Time frame · From treatment suspension at Week 37 until resumption of any hormonal therapy (up to Month 98)
Undetectable PSA at 36 weeks was serum PSA levels \<0.2 ng/mL at Week 36. At Week 37, study treatment was suspended for participants whose PSA values were undetectable (\<0.2 ng/mL) at Week 36 as determined by the central laboratory. Study treatment may have been suspended only once (at Week 37) due to undetectable PSA and was reinitiated if subsequent central laboratory PSA values increased to ≥2.0 ng/mL for participants with prior prostatectomy or ≥5.0 ng/mL for participants without prostatectomy. The time to resumption of any hormonal therapy following suspension at Week 37 due to undetectable PSA was defined as the time in months between the date of treatment suspension at Week 37 due to undetectable PSA and the date that hormonal therapy was restarted.
Time to Castration Resistance
Time frame · From randomization to the first occurrence of radiographic disease progression, PSA progression or SSE, whichever occurred first with castrate levels of testosterone (up to Month 98)
Time to castration resistance applied only to participants receiving leuprolide treatment and was defined as the time in months from randomization to the first occurrence of radiographic disease progression by BICR, PSA progression or symptomatic skeletal event (SSE) whichever occurred first with castrate levels of testosterone (\<50 ng/dL).
Eligibility
Who can take part.
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- Not reported
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate at initial biopsy, without neuroendocrine differentiation, signet cell, or small cell features; * Prostate cancer initially treated by radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy (including brachytherapy) or both, with curative intent; * PSA doubling time ≤ 9 months; * Screening PSA by the central laboratory ≥ 1 ng/mL for patients who had radical prostatectomy (with or without radiotherapy) as primary treatment for prostate cancer and at least 2 ng/mL above the nadir for patients who had radiotherapy only as primary treatment for prostate cancer; * Serum testosterone ≥ 150 ng/dL (5.2 nmol/L). Exclusion Criteria: * Prior or present evidence of distant metastatic disease as assessed by radiographic imaging; * Prior hormonal therapy. Neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy to treat prostate cancer ≤ 36 months in duration and ≥ 9 months before randomization, or a single dose or a short course (≤ 6 months) of hormonal therapy given for rising PSA ≥ 9 months before randomization is allowed.; * Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy, aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole, abiraterone acetate, or enzalutamide for prostate cancer; * Prior systemic biologic therapy, including immunotherapy, for prostate cancer; * Major surgery within 4 weeks before randomization; * Treatment with 5-α reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride) within 4 weeks of randomization; * Known or suspected brain metastasis or active leptomeningeal disease; * History of another invasive cancer within 3 years before screening, with the exception of fully treated cancers with a remote probability of recurrence
Study locations
255 registered sites.
Australia · Austria · Brazil · Canada · Denmark · Finland · France · Italy · Netherlands · Poland · Slovakia · South Korea · Spain · Sweden · Taiwan · United Kingdom · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham, IDS Pharmacy
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Alaska Urological Institute dba Alaska Clinical Research Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Arizona Urology Specialists
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Tower Hematology Oncology Medical Group
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Cedars-Senai OCC Pharmacy
Los Angeles, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, United States
Sutter Medical Group, Vascular & Varicose Vein Center
Roseville, California, United States
Sutter Medical Group
Roseville, California, United States
UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, United States
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
University of California, Davis, School of Medicine
Sacramento, California, United States
The Urology Center of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, United States
Foothills Urology, P.C.
Golden, Colorado, United States
Eastern Connecticut Hematology Oncology Associates
Norwich, Connecticut, United States
Lakeland Regional Health Hollis Cancer Center
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern Medical Group
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
First Urology, PSC
Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States
Publications
Results and literature.
Related trials
More studies on Leuprolide.
A Study for Subjects With Prostate Cancer Who Previously Participated in an Enzalutamide Clinical Study
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. · Prostate Cancer
Phase 2
Recruiting
900
2026-07
Testing the Anti-cancer Drug Darolutamide in Patients With Testosterone-Driven Salivary Gland Cancers
National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Locally Advanced Salivary Gland Carcinoma · Metastatic Salivary Gland Carcinoma
Phase 2
Active, not recruiting
21
2026-07
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) in Ovarian Preservation in SLE Subjects Receiving Cyclophosphamide as Determined by Questionnaires
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) · Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Sle) · Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (Poi)
Not applicable
Recruiting
100
2026-07
RecoverPC: Relugolix vs GnRH Agonist in Quality of Life
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Prostate Cancer · Prostatic Neoplasms
Phase 2
Recruiting
110
2026-07
A Study of Leuprorelin 1-Month (4-Week) Formulation in Children With Central Precocious Puberty
LG Chem · Central Precocious Puberty
Phase 4
Recruiting
43
2026-07
Testing the Addition of Darolutamide to Hormonal Therapy (Androgen Deprivation Therapy [ADT]) After Surgery for Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer, The ERADICATE Study
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group · Prostate Carcinoma
Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
27
2026-07
Study to Test the Drug Darolutamide Along With the Drugs Leuprolide Acetate and Exemestane in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors
National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Adult Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumor
Phase 2
Active, not recruiting
17
2026-07
Efficacy and Safety of Darolutamide Combined With Docetaxel and ADT as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.
RenJi Hospital · Prostate Cancer · Prostate
Phase 2
Not yet recruiting
200
2026-07
Related PeptideStat pages
Put the record in context.
Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.