Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT02457156·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Cattell-Warren Versus Blumgart Techniques of Pancreatico-jejunostomy Following Pancreato-duodenectomy

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

295

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The purpose of this study is to compare two different techniques of performing a pancreatic anastomosis; Cattell-Warren versus Blumgart to determine if a Blumgart anastomosis reduces pancreatic remnant leak, post-operative complications and overall length of hospital stay.

Full detailed description

This is a randomised controlled, phase III, double blinded, multicentre clinical trial comparing Cattell-Warren (CWA) versus. Blumgart (BA) methods of pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticduodenectomy for supected malignancy of the pancreatic head. The primary objective of the trial is to establish if the Blumgart anastomosis reduces pancreatic remnant leak and in turn complications, hospital stay, cost and promote enhanced recorvery programs. 506 patients (253 patients per treatment arm) will be recruited from approximately 7 centres throughout the United Kingdom. Patients recommended for resection who provide written informed consent will be randomised to one of the following treatment arms on the day of surgery by the surgeon: Arm A: Blumgart method of panreaticojejunostomy. Arm B: CattellWarren method pf pancreaticojejunostomy. Randomisation will be undertaken intra-operatively, following pancreatic head excision, just prior to pancreatic head remnant reconstruction. Patients will be assessed post operatively on days 3 to 7 and on day of dishcharge from hospital. Patients will continue to be followed up in the outpatient setting at 3, 6 and 12 months post surgery. All laboratory and physical assessments performed will be in line standard care. Blood samples for the translational study will be taken subject to informed consent pre-operatively and post-operatively 5 days after surgery. A histological (H\&E stained) slide of the pancreatic transection margin should be taken as routine. This will be requested from each patient for central pathology review to assess the amount of fibrosis.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

PROCEDURE

Blumgart Anastomosis

1. Trans pancreatic suture "U" stich incorporating pancreatic parenchyma and jejunal serosa, left loose. 2. Pancreatic duct to jejunal mucosa sutures, inserted and tied. 3. Trans pancreatic suture "U" stich brought back through the jejuanl serosa anteriorly, tied.

PROCEDURE

Cattell-Warren Anastomosis

1. Posterior row of sutures from pancreatic parenchyma to jejunal serosa, inserted and tied. 2. Pancreatic duct to jejunal mucosa sutures, inserted and tied. 3. Anterior row of sutures from pancreatic parenchyma to jejunal serosa, inserted and tied.

DRUG

Octreotide

Octrotide (100ug) to be administered on the evening before surgery and then 100ug three times daily on the day of surgery and post operative days 1 - 6.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    May 29, 2015

  2. Study start

    Apr 23, 2015

  3. Primary completion

    Jul 31, 2018

  4. Study completion

    Jan 31, 2019

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Mar 13, 2025

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Presence or absence of post-operative pancreatic fistula

Time frame · Assessed up to 3 months after surgery.

Post-operative pancreatic fistula are defined as any abnormal connection between the pancreatic duct epithelium and another epithelised surface, which contains pancreatic derived, enzyme rich fluid. This will be assessed up to 3 months following surgery on inpatient days 3-7, day of discharge (expected to be 1 - 5 weeks after surgery) and 3 month follow up.

Secondary outcomes

Entry into programs of adjuvent therapy

Time frame · 3, 6 and 12 month follow up

Mortality Rate

Time frame · Death due to any cause during the study will be recorded

Rate of delayed gastric emptying

Time frame · Post operative day 3, 5, 7, and the day of discharge, which is expected to be between 1 - 5 weeks after surgery.

Rate of wound infections

Time frame · Post operative day 3, 5, 7, the day of discharge, which is expected to be between 1 - 5 weeks after surgery and 3, 6 and 12 month follow up

Rate of pulmonary infection

Time frame · The day of discharge, which is expected to be between 1 - 5 weeks after surgery and 3 month follow up.

Rate of post-operative fluid collections

Time frame · post operative days 3-7, the day of discharge, which is expected to be between 1 - 5 weeks after surgery and 3 month follow-up

Operation time

Time frame · Day of surgery

Rate of intra and post-operative bleeding

Time frame · day of surgery, post operaive day 3, 5, 7 and the day of discharge, which is expected to be between 1 - 5 weeks after surgery

Rate of re-operation

Time frame · Up to 12 months after surgery

Rate of venous thrombo-embolism

Time frame · Post operative day 3, 5, 7, the day of discharge, which is expected to be between 1 - 5 weeks after surgery, 3, 6 and 12 month follow up

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing an elective pancreato-duodenectomy for presumed malignancy. * Ability of the subject to understand the nature and consequences of the trial. * Ability to rovide writen informed consent. * Age 18 or greater. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing extended pancreato-duodenectomy * Left, central or total pancreatectomy. * Arterial resection or multi-visceral resection * Previous pancreatic surgery * Surgery for known chronic pancreatitis. * Recruited to any other pancreatic resection trial. * Pregnant women. * Women of childbearing potential, including women whose last menstrual period was less than one year prior to screening, unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception from time of consent up to the day of surgery.

Study locations

1 registered sites.

United Kingdom. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Octreotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.