Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT02563353·Not applicable·INTERVENTIONAL

PTH and Vibration in OSteoporosis Study

Status

Completed

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

35

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

12

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Objective: This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in osteoporosis patients randomized to standard parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment alone or to standard PTH treatment and Whole-body vibration (WBV). PTH is an effective but expensive anabolic treatment for osteoporosis. WBV stimulates muscles and bones. A combined treatment might have synergistic or additive beneficial effects on bone, reducing fracture risk making treatment more effective and cost-effective. A beneficial effect on muscles and thereby falls risk of WBV may improve fracture risk even further. If the results of this pilot study are promising then a strong case can be made for a large multi-centre RCT using strong endpoints including fractures and falls.

Full detailed description

Study Objectives 1. To determine if WBV in addition to standard PTH treatment has a greater effect on bone mass in osteoporosis patients compared to standard PTH treatment alone. 2. To determine if WBV in addition to standard PTH treatment has a greater effect on bone microarchitecture in osteoporosis patients compared to standard PTH treatment alone, as assessed by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). 3. To determine if WBV in addition to standard PTH treatment has a greater effect on markers of bone formation and resorption in osteoporosis patients compared to standard PTH treatment alone. 4. To study the effects of WBV on muscle function and balance in osteoporosis 5. To assess the safety and adherence to WBV in osteoporotic patients Study Design: General Design This will be a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) in osteoporosis patients being started on standard PTH treatment according to Danish Osteoporosis guidelines. Participants will be randomized to standard PTH treatment alone or to standard PTH treatment and WBV. Statistical Plan: Sample Size Determination The inclusion of 32 participants (16 in both groups) would give the study 80% power to detect a clinically significant additional increase of 22% with WBV (assuming a 9% increase of BMD in the PTH alone group and 11% increase in the combined PTH+WBV group, and assuming a SD of the BMD increase of 2%. Allowing for a 20% dropout rate, the plan is to include 40 participants (20 in each group). From previous research on WBV by one of the investigators (TM), statistically significant differences were found in bone formation markers and in muscle strength at 3 months between the WBV and control groups with a sample size of 35. The number of participants in the latter pilot work is reassuringly consistent with the sample size calculations. The number needed to be included is far less (34%) than the actual number of patients treated with PTH in the recruiting departments in a similar time period last year. Statistical Methods: STATA/SPSS will be used for data analysis. For the primary endpoint (BMD at 12 months) the mean percentage changes in BMD between the two groups will be compared using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) provided the distribution is normal. For the other endpoints parametric tests will be used to assess differences in the two groups for normally distributed data and non-parametric tests for data not normally distributed. The randomization will be done online in the data capture program Red Cap. There will be created a Data dictionary that contains detailed descriptions of each variable used by the registry, including the source of the variable, and normal ranges if relevant. Information: Participants will be recruited during their attendance at the outpatient clinics. At that time the subjects will be given a full explanation of the study as well as the patient information sheet and invited to participate in the study. At an interval of not less than 24 hours, patients will be invited to consent prior to starting their PTH treatment. The information will be sufficient for subjects to make an informed decision about their participation in this study. The subject will complete and sign a consent form to indicate they are giving valid consent to participate in the trial. Withdrawal of Subjects: Patients who withdraw consent from participation in the trial will be withdrawn from the trial. This will not affect their standard medical management and not cause any adverse effect on the subject.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

OTHER

whole-body vibration

Whole-body vibration on vibration platforms. 30-40 Hertz, from 2 mm (low) to 4 mm (high) amplitude, 1 minutes x 6 with 1 minute break between. 3 times a week.

DRUG

teriparatide

Teriparatide, 20 microgram/day. 24 months of treatment.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Sep 30, 2015

  2. Study start

    Nov 2015

  3. Primary completion

    Nov 2018

  4. Study completion

    Nov 2019

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Sep 18, 2020

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Changes in the BMD, Bone Mineral Density of hip and spine region (Hologic DXA machine)

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 6, 12, 18, 24 months from baseline

DXA scan of hip and spine regions, BMD (g/cm\^2)

Secondary outcomes

Changes in the Bone microarchitecture at the tibia

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months from baseline

HRpQCT assesses parameters of bone microarchitecture at the tibia.

Changes in the Bone microarchitecture at the radius

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months from baseline

HRpQCT assesses parameters of bone microarchitecture at the radius.

changes in muscle mass

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 12 and 24 months from baseline

Full body DXA

Changes from baseline in the markers of bone resorption

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months from baseline

CTX, sclerostin

Changes from baseline in the markers of bone formation

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months from baseline

P1NP

Changes in Muscle strength

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3,6,12,18 and 24 months from baseline

Measurements of muscle strength (leg extensor power)

Changes in handgrip strength

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3,6,12,18 and 24 months from baseline

Measurements of muscle strength (handgrip strength)

Changes in Balance

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3, 6 ,12, 18 and 24 months from baseline

Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

Adherence to WBV

Time frame · During 2 years from the start of the treatment

Self Reporting training log

Changes in physical activity

Time frame · at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 12, and 24 months from baseline

IPAQ short version

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
50 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Women starting PTH treatment for osteoporosis according to Danish Osteoporosis guidelines Exclusion Criteria: * Women currently taking oral glucocorticoids * Women unable to give informed consent * Women unable to stand for 2 minutes at a time on the vibration platform * Women who have contraindications to WBV (e.g. joint prosthesis, pacemakers)

Study locations

1 registered sites.

Denmark. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Odense University Hospital

Odense, Denmark

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 15138664O'Neill TW, Cockerill W, Matthis C, Raspe HH, Lunt M, Cooper C, Banzer D, Cannata JB, Naves M, Felsch B, Felsenberg D, Janott J, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kragl G, Lopes Vaz A, Lyritis G, Masaryk P, Poor G, Reid DM, Reisinger W, Scheidt-Nave C, Stepan JJ, Todd CJ, Woolf AD, Reeve J, Silman AJ. Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int. 2004 Sep;15(9):760-5. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1615-4. Epub 2004 May 12.PMID 14618303Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla AK, Cannata JB, Eastell R, Felsenberg D, Gennari C, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kiss C, Masaryk P, Naves M, Poor G, Raspe H, Reid DM, Reeve J, Stepan J, Todd C, Woolf AD, O'Neill TW. Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004 Feb;15(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1547-4. Epub 2003 Nov 13.PMID 11846331Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Grove MR, Moncur MM, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ 3rd. Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporos Int. 2001 Dec;12(12):1042-9. doi: 10.1007/s001980170015.PMID 16283064Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Lunsjo K, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Rehnberg C, Jonsson B. Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-0015-8. Epub 2005 Nov 9.PMID 17144789Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465-75. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113.PMID 11346808Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2001 May 10;344(19):1434-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105103441904.PMID 19093708Blick SK, Dhillon S, Keam SJ. Teriparatide: a review of its use in osteoporosis. Drugs. 2008;68(18):2709-37. doi: 10.2165/0003495-200868180-00012.PMID 21209784Bergmann P, Body JJ, Boonen S, Boutsen Y, Devogelaer JP, Goemaere S, Kaufman J, Reginster JY, Rozenberg S. Loading and skeletal development and maintenance. J Osteoporos. 2010 Dec 20;2011:786752. doi: 10.4061/2011/786752.PMID 9738135Lewis RD, Modlesky CM. Nutrition, physical activity, and bone health in women. Int J Sport Nutr. 1998 Sep;8(3):250-84. doi: 10.1123/ijsn.8.3.250.PMID 19840876Rizzoli R, Bianchi ML, Garabedian M, McKay HA, Moreno LA. Maximizing bone mineral mass gain during growth for the prevention of fractures in the adolescents and the elderly. Bone. 2010 Feb;46(2):294-305. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 17.PMID 9458760Chow JW, Fox S, Jagger CJ, Chambers TJ. Role for parathyroid hormone in mechanical responsiveness of rat bone. Am J Physiol. 1998 Jan;274(1):E146-54. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1998.274.1.E146.PMID 12639904Li J, Duncan RL, Burr DB, Gattone VH, Turner CH. Parathyroid hormone enhances mechanically induced bone formation, possibly involving L-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels. Endocrinology. 2003 Apr;144(4):1226-33. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220821.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Teriparatide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.