Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT02693119·Phase 2·INTERVENTIONAL

A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for Treatment of Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 2

Enrollment

12

Locations

1

Results

Posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This is a Phase 2, prospective, randomized, double-masked, vehicle controlled, single-center study in approximately 12 subjects with LHON to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of elamipretide (MTP-131) topical ophthalmic solution in this patient population. At the conclusion of 52 weeks of treatment, subjects will be offered the opportunity to enter an Open Label Extension for up to 48 additional weeks of treatment.

Full detailed description

This was a prospective, randomized, double-masked (DM), vehicle-controlled, single-center study plus open label extension period (OLE) in which approximately 12 subjects with LHON having the genetic mtDNA mutation m.11778G\>A were randomized in a masked manner into 1 of 3 groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: one drop of elamipretide 1.0% topical ophthalmic solution twice daily (BID) in the: left eye, right eye, or both eyes. After completion of the 52-week treatment period or the Week 56 follow-up period, subjects were invited to participate in the OLE period for up to 108 weeks. During the OLE participants received 1% topical opthalmic elamipretide in both eyes (OU) daily. If a subject did not consent to the OLE, he/she completed the study at the Week 56 (±7 days) visit. There were 4 periods in this study: (1) screening period (up to 6 weeks); (2) double-masked treatment period (52 weeks); (3) OLE period (up to 108 weeks), and (4) follow-up period (4 weeks) after completion of End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

elamipretide (MTP-131) 1% topical ophthalmic solution

DRUG

Vehicle topical ophthalmic solution

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Feb 26, 2016

  2. Study start

    Mar 2016

  3. Primary completion

    Sep 2019

  4. Study completion

    Dec 2019

  5. Results posted

    Oct 12, 2021

  6. Registry updated

    Nov 30, 2021

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Double Masked Period: Incidence of Ocular TEAEs

Time frame · Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)

The incidence of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Open Label Extension: Incidence of Ocular TEAEs

Time frame · Assessed at Week 68, 84, 100, 116, 132, 148, 152, Week 160/ (End of treatment visit)

Open Label Extension: The incidence of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Double Masked Period: Severity of Ocular TEAEs

Time frame · Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)

The severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

OLE: Severity of Ocular TEAEs

Time frame · Assessed at Week 68, 84, 100, 116, 132, 148, 152, Week 160/ (End of treatment visit)

The severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Double Masked Period: Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

Time frame · Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)

Double Masked Period: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome).

Open Label Extension Period: Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160 (follow-up visit).

Open Label Extension Period: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome).

Secondary outcomes

Double Masked Period: Photopic Negative Response Electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) A-wave Amplitude

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.

Change from baseline in photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) a-wave amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the a-wave is associated with worse outcomes. Change from baseline in a-wave amplitude: a more positive number equals a decrease in amplitude, and therefore a worse outcome, a more negative number mean a better outcome.

Open Label Extension Period: Photopic Negative Response Electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) A-wave Amplitude

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160

Change from baseline in photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) a-wave Amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the a-wave is associated with worse outcomes. Change from baseline in a-wave amplitude: a more positive number equals a decrease in amplitude, and therefore a worse outcome, a more negative number mean a better outcome.

Double Masked Period: Photopic Negative Response Electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) B-wave Amplitude

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.

Change from baseline in photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) b-wave amplitude by visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR -ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the b-wave is associated with worse outcomes. Change from baseline in b-wave amplitude: a more negative number equals a decrease in amplitude, and therefore a worse outcome, a more positive number mean a better outcome.

Open Label Extension Period: PhNR-ERG B-wave Amplitude

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160

Change from baseline in photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) b-wave Amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR -ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the b-wave is associated with worse outcomes. Change from baseline in b-wave amplitude: a more negative number equals a decrease in amplitude, and therefore a worse outcome, a more positive number means a better outcome.

Double Masked Period: PhNR Amplitude

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.

Double Masked Period: Change from baseline in PhNR Amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR -ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in PhNR amplitude means worse outcome. Change from baseline: A more negative number means a better outcome, a more positive number means a worse outcome.

Open Label Extension Period: PhNR Amplitude

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160

Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline in PhNR Amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR -ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in PhNR amplitude means worse outcome. Change from baseline: A more negative number means a better outcome, a more positive number means a worse outcome.

Double Masked Period: PhNR/B-wave Amplitude Ratio

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.

Double Masked Period: Change from baseline in PhNR/b-wave amplitude ratio by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in PhNR amplitude means worse outcome.

Open Label Extension Period: Change From Baseline by Visit PhNR/b Wave Amplitude Ratio

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160

Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline by visit PhNR/b Wave Amplitude Ratio by visit. A reduced amplitude ratio equals worse outcome.

Double Masked Period: Change From Baseline by Visit PhNR Peak to Trough Adjusted for A-wave Amplitude

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.

Double Masked Period: Change from baseline by visit in PhNR Peak to Trough Adjusted for a-wave Amplitude by Visit. Calculated as (b-wave amplitude - PhNR amplitude)/a-wave amplitude. A reduced amplitude ratio equals worse outcome.

Open Label Extension Period: Change From Baseline by Visit PhNR Peak to Trough Adjusted for A-wave Amplitude

Time frame · Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160

Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline by visit in PhNR Peak to Trough Adjusted for a-wave Amplitude by Visit. \[Calculated by b-wave amplitude - PhNR amplitude)/a-wave amplitude.\] Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the a-wave is associated with worse outcomes. A reduced amplitude ratio equals worse outcome.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Adults ≥18 and ≤ 50 years old at the time of loss of vision in the second eye. * Able to provide informed consent and willing to comply with all study visits and examinations * Diagnosis of LHON based on clinical and ophthalmic functional/anatomic test findings, and satisfactory documentation of the mitochondrial DNA mutation m.11778G\>A * Loss of vision in both eyes of ≥1 year and ≤10 years at the time of the Screening Visit and current clinically stable visual function (as assessed by the Investigator) * Able to self-administer eye drops as demonstrated at screening or having a care provider who can do so * Documentation of having satisfactorily completed at least two previous Humphrey automated visual field tests prior to screening. * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use birth control as specified in the protocol from the date they sign the informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: * Any other ocular pathology requiring treatment with prescription topical ophthalmic drops (e.g., glaucoma, dry eye) * Cup to disc ratio of \> 0.8 in either eye * Media opacity, suboptimal pupillary dilatation, or refractive error that interferes with adequate retinal imaging * Known to be immunocompromised or receiving systemic immunosuppression * Any disease or medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would prevent the subject from participating in the study or might confound study results * Participation in other investigational drug or device clinical trials within 30 days prior to enrollment, or planning to participate in any other investigational drug or device clinical trials within 30 days of study completion * Women who are pregnant or lactating Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study locations

1 registered sites.

United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Doheny Eye Center

Pasadena, California, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Elamipretide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.