DRUG
Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel (ATG) in Combination With Temozolomide in Subjects With Thoracic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
40
Locations
10
Results
Posted
Publications
1
Study summary
What the protocol is testing.
The purpose of the protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lanreotide ATG 120 mg in combination with Temozolomide in subjects with unresectable advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or thymus as Disease Control Rate at 9 months.
Interventions
Treatment arms and agents.
Timeline
From registration to results.
First posted
Mar 3, 2016
Study start
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Feb 8, 2019
Study completion
Jun 18, 2019
Results posted
Oct 1, 2020
Registry updated
Oct 1, 2020
Outcomes
What the study measures.
Primary outcomes
Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed Locally at Month 9
Time frame · Up to Month 9; for sensitivity analysis-2, up to 10.5 months
Responders were participants who showed disease control according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria v 1.1 assessed locally by the investigator. The DCR was defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST criteria v1.1. A sensitivity analysis-1 of local DCR was performed excluding participants withdrawn before 9 months with reason other than progressive disease (PD) or missing assessment and considering participants with PD prior or at 9 months as failures. In addition, a sensitivity analysis-2 was performed in order to consider assessments done between 7.5 and 10.5 months as 9 months assessments when 9-month assessment was missing using same methodology, i.e. considering PD prior or at 9 months and participants withdrawn with other or missing reasons as failures.
Secondary outcomes
DCR Assessed Centrally at Month 9
Time frame · Up to Month 9
The DCR was defined as SD, PR or CR according to RECIST criteria v1.1. A second set of the original computed tomography (CT) scan images were used for a centralized RECIST v1.1 assessment by an independent radiologist.
Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed Locally and Centrally
Time frame · From Day 1 up to end of study, 52 weeks
The PFS was defined as the time from the first treatment administration to disease progression according to RECIST criteria v 1.1 or death from any cause. The PFS was assessed locally by the investigator and centrally by an independent radiologist. The distribution of PFS times was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PFS of participants who were lost to follow-up and those who had not progressed at end of study were censored at the date of the last disease assessment.
Median Time to Response (TTR) Assessed Locally and Centrally
Time frame · From Day 1 up to end of study, 52 weeks
The TTR was defined as the time from first treatment administration to the first objective tumor response (PR or CR according to RECIST criteria v 1.1). The TTR was assessed locally by the investigator and centrally by an independent radiologist. The distribution of TTR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The TTR of participants who were lost to follow-up or died prior to any objective tumor response were censored at the date of the last disease assessment.
Median Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed Locally and Centrally
Time frame · From Day 1 up to end of study, 52 weeks
The DOR was defined as the time from onset of the first objective tumor response (PR or CR) to objective tumor progression (PD) according to RECIST criteria v 1.1. The DOR was assessed locally by the investigator and centrally by an independent radiologist.
Median Time to Progression (TTP) Assessed Locally and Centrally
Time frame · From Day 1 up to end of study, 52 weeks
The TTP was defined as the time from first treatment administration to the first objective tumor progression (PD) according to RECIST criteria v 1.1. The TTP was assessed locally by the investigator and centrally by an independent radiologist. The distribution of TTP times was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The TTP of participants who were lost to follow-up, and those who had not progressed at end of study were censored at the date of the last disease assessment.
Best Overall Response (BOR) Assessed Locally and Centrally
Time frame · From Day 1 up to end of study, 52 weeks
The BOR was defined as the highest OR achieved by the participant from the time of first treatment until disease progression/recurrence or the end of study according to RECIST criteria v1.1 and was classified as: CR \> PR \> Non-CR/Non-progressive disease (NCR/NPD) \> SD \> PD \> ND \> not evaluable (NE). The BOR was assessed locally by the investigator and centrally by an independent radiologist. Percentages are based on the number of participants in the ITT/Safety population with non-missing observations.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed Locally and Centrally at Months 9 and 12
Time frame · Months 9 and 12
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR according to RECIST criteria v1.1. The ORR was assessed locally by the investigator and centrally by an independent radiologist. The ORR was based on the participants with PD prior to 9 and 12 months with respectively PD at 9 and 12 months, and participants withdrawn before the assessment for reason other than PD or missing as failures.
DCR Assessed Locally and Centrally at Month 12
Time frame · Month 12
The DCR was defined as SD, PR or CR according to RECIST criteria v1.1. The DCR was assessed locally by the investigator and centrally by an independent radiologist.
DCR Assessed Locally and Centrally at Month 9 by Carcinoid Type
Time frame · Up to Month 9
The influence of type of carcinoid \[typical, atypical and undetermined carcinoid neuroendocrine tumors (NET)\] on the local and central DCR at 9 months was analysed. Typical carcinoids were defined with absent foci of necrosis and mitotic count \< 2 mitoses/2 millimeters\^2 (mm\^2); atypical carcinoids were defined with presence of foci of necrosis and/or 2 mitoses/2 mm\^2 \<= mitotic count \<= 10 mitoses/2 mm\^2; and carcinoid NET were defined as confirmed carcinoid without foci of necrosis and/or mitotic count reported. The DCR was assessed locally by the investigator and centrally by an independent radiologist.
Percentage of Biochemical Responders According to Chromogranin A (CgA) Plasma Levels
Time frame · Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Participants with baseline CgA plasma levels greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN) were assessed for a biochemical response. A biochemical responder was defined as a participant who had a decrease of CgA \>= 50% compared to baseline, while biochemical SD was defined as a decrease \< 50% or an increase \<= 25% compared to baseline. Biochemical non-responders had an increase \>25% compared to baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Day 1.
Eligibility
Who can take part.
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- Not reported
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria: * Histological documented unresectable advanced (locally or metastatic) well or moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the lung or thymus (typical and atypical carcinoids according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2004 criteria); * Imaging documented progression within 12 months before screening visit (V1), according to RECIST criteria v 1.1; * Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST criteria v 1.1, on a CT scan performed at screening visit (V1); * Octreoscan or Ga68-DOTA-TATE/TOC/NOC-PET-TC within 12 months before screening visit (V1); * Adequate liver, renal and bone marrow function. Exclusion Criteria: * Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed Neuroendocrine tumours (NET), according to WHO 2004 criteria * Neuroendocrine tumours other than lung or thymus * Non-neuroendocrine thymic neoplasm * Received a prior therapy with Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) within 6 months prior to screening visit (V1) * Treated with systemic therapies (chemotherapy, interferon-alpha, somatostatin analogues, molecular target therapies) within 1 month prior to screening visit (V1) * Treated with a number of systemic therapy lines \> 3 prior to screening visit (V1), and any of the following: 1. for chemotherapy no more than 1 line prior to V1 2. for somatostatin analogue no more than 1 line therapy, considered as treatment lasting more than 6 months, prior to V1 no therapy with Temozolomide (TMZ) prior to V1 3. Received a prior therapy with Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) within 6 months prior to screening visit (V1) * Received external palliative radiotherapy within the last 28 days prior to screening visit (V1) * Received locoregional therapies (Transarterial embolization, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, thermo-ablation with radio-frequency) and Selective internal radiotherapy within 3 months prior to screening visit (V1) * Presence of symptomatic brain metastasis * Subjects with symptomatic cholelithiasis at screening visit (V1)
Study locations
10 registered sites.
Italy. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.
Oncologia Medica - Istituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo - IOM
Viagrande, Catania, Italy
Unità Operativa di Oncologia Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia, Italy
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) S.r.l., IRCCS
Meldola, Italy
Unità Oncologia Medica Gastrointestinale e Tumori Neuroendocrini Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IEO
Milan, Italy
Dipartimento di Endocrinologia e Oncologia Molecolare e Clinica , Università degli Studi
Naples, Italy
Dipartimento di Oncologia Università di Torino Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga
Orbassano, Italy
S.C di Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Perugia
Perugia, Italy
U.O. Oncologia - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana Ospedale S. Chiara
Pisa, Italy
Oncologia Medica - Istituto Tumori Regina Elena San Gallicano
Roma, Italy
OUC di Oncologia- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata - Ospedale Borgo Roma
Verona, Italy
Related trials
More studies on Lanreotide.
A Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot in Patients With GEP-NET
Camurus AB · Gastro-enteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
332
2026-07
Carcinoid Syndrome Efficacy Study Featuring an Oral Daily Paltusotine Regimen
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc. · Carcinoid Syndrome · Carcinoid
Phase 3
Recruiting
141
2026-06
Analysis of Optimal Treatment Sequencing of Surufatinib and Somatostatin Analogs in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study
West China Hospital · Neuroendocrine Tumors
Not applicable
Active, not recruiting
500
2026-04
Cabozantinib and Lanreotide as Treatment for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan · Neuroendocrine Tumors,Gastroenteropancreatic
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Recruiting
49
2026-04
Lanreotide In Polycystic Kidney Disease Study
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD
Phase 3
Completed
159
2026-04
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
SWOG Cancer Research Network · Pancreatic Carcinoma · Pancreatic Neoplasm
Phase 3
Recruiting
274
2026-03
Study of RYZ101 Compared With SOC in Pts w Inoperable SSTR+ Well-differentiated GEP-NET That Has Progressed Following 177Lu-SSA Therapy
RayzeBio, Inc. · GEP-NET · Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
Phase 3
Recruiting
338
2026-03
Study to Evaluate the Safety, PK, and Dose Response of Paltusotine in Subjects With Carcinoid Syndrome
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals Inc. · Carcinoid Syndrome · Carcinoid
Phase 2
Completed
36
2026-03
Related PeptideStat pages
Put the record in context.
Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.