Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT02954458·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of Teduglutide in Pediatric Participants With Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS)

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

61

Locations

22

Results

Posted

Publications

2

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This study will follow participants who completed the TED-C14-006 study. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of teduglutide in pediatric participants with Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS). This study will also offer teduglutide treatment to eligible participants, regardless of treatment received in TED-C14-006 or SHP633-301.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

TED

0.05 mg/kg SC injection once daily.

OTHER

SOC

Standard safety assessments and adjustments in nutritional support.

DEVICE

Syringe

Teduglutide will be administered using syringe.

DEVICE

Needle

Teduglutide will be administered using needle.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Nov 3, 2016

  2. Study start

    Jan 9, 2017

  3. Primary completion

    Nov 5, 2020

  4. Study completion

    Nov 5, 2020

  5. Results posted

    Oct 13, 2021

  6. Registry updated

    Mar 28, 2025

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Time frame · From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 46 months)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that started or worsened on or after the date of first dose of teduglutide for participants in the TED/TED, TED/NTT, and NTT/TED treatment groups, or after the core study baseline visit for participants in the NTT/NTT group.

Change From Baseline in Average Total Urine Output at End of Treatment (EOT) of Last Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of last cycle (up to Month 36) (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Average total urine output was recorded over a 48-hour period of parental support (PS) stability before every scheduled site visit and within 1 week of implementing any PS adjustment. The Average daily urine output milliliter per kilogram per day (mL/kg/day) was calculated as: Total urine output over 48 hours / 2) / body weight (kilogram \[kg\]) where total urine output was calculated as the sum of the urine output in milliliter (mL) and the urine-only diaper weights in gram (g) (1g = 1mL) for the participant collected on the output diary form of electronic case report from (eCRF).

Change From Baseline in Average Total Urine Output at Last Visit During Non-Teduglutide Treatment (NT)

Time frame · Baseline, Last visit in NT (up to Month 39)

Average total urine output was recorded over a 48 hour period of PS stability before every scheduled site visit and within 1 week of implementing any PS adjustment. Average daily urine output mL/kg/day was calculated as: (Total urine output over 48 hours/2) / body weight (kg) where total urine output was calculated as the sum of the urine output in mL and the urine-only diaper weights in gram (1g = 1mL) for the participant collected on the output diary form of electronic case report from (eCRF).

Change From Baseline in Average Number of Stools Per Day at EOT of Last Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of last cycle (up to Month 36) (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Fecal output was recorded over a 48-hour period of PS stability before every scheduled site visit and within 1 week of implementing any PS adjustment. The average daily fecal output was summarized by the average number of stools per day. The average number of stools per day was calculated as (sum of the daily data in a 48-hour period/2).

Change From Baseline in Average Number of Stools Per Day at Last Visit During Non-Teduglutide Treatment (NT)

Time frame · Baseline, Last visit in NT (up to Month 39)

Fecal output was recorded over a 48-hour period of PS stability before every scheduled site visit and within 1 week of implementing any PS adjustment. The average daily fecal output was summarized by the average number of stools per day. The average number of stools per day was calculated as (sum of the daily data in a 48-hour period/2).

Change From Baseline in Average Total Daily Stool/Mixed Stool Diaper Weight at EOT of Last Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of last cycle (up to Month 36) (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Fecal output was recorded over a 48-hour period of PS stability before every scheduled site visit and within 1 week of implementing any PS adjustment. The average daily fecal output was summarized by the average total daily stool/mixed stool diaper weight (gram per kilogram per day \[g/kg/day\]). The body weight was used to calculate the daily stool/mixed stool diaper weight (g/kg/day).

Change From Baseline in Average Total Daily Stool/Mixed Stool Diaper Weight at Last Visit During Non-Teduglutide Treatment (NT)

Time frame · Baseline, Last visit in NT (up to Month 39)

Fecal output was recorded over a 48-hour period of PS stability before every scheduled site visit and within 1 week of implementing any PS adjustment. The average daily fecal output was summarized by the average total daily stool/mixed stool diaper weight (gram per kilogram per day \[g/kg/day\]). The body weight was used to calculate the daily stool/mixed stool diaper weight (g/kg/day).

Change From Baseline in Average Total Ostomy Output at EOT of Last Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of last cycle (up to Month 36) (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Fecal output was recorded over a 48-hour period of PS stability before every scheduled site visit and within 1 week of implementing any PS adjustment. The average daily fecal output was summarized the average ostomy output per day (mL/kg/day).

Secondary outcomes

Number of Participants Who Achieved At Least 20 Percent (%), 50%, and 75% Reduction From Baseline in Diary Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT) of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Number of participants who achieved at least 20%, 50%, and 75% reduction from baseline in diary PS volume at EOT of last cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Number of Participants Who Achieved At Least 20 Percent (%), 50%, and 75% Reduction From Baseline in Prescribed PS Volume at End of Treatment (EOT) of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Number of participants who achieved at least 20%, 50%, and 75% reduction from baseline in prescribed PS volume at EOT of east cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Change From Baseline in Diary PS Volume at EOT of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Change from baseline in diary PS volume at EOT of each cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Percent Change From Baseline in Diary PS Volume at EOT of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Percent change from baseline in diary PS volume at EOT of each cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Change From Baseline in Prescribed PS Volume at EOT of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Change from baseline in prescribed PS volume at EOT of each cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Percent Change From Baseline in Prescribed PS Volume at EOT of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Percent Change from baseline in prescribed PS volume at EOT of each cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Change From Baseline in Diary PS Caloric Intake at EOT of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Change from baseline in diary PS caloric intake at EOT of each cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported. Here, kilo-calories per kilogram per day was abbreviated as (kcal/kg/day).

Percent Change From Baseline in Diary PS Caloric Intake at EOT of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Percent change from baseline in diary PS Caloric intake at EOT of each cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Change From Baseline in Prescribed PS Caloric Intake at EOT of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Change from baseline in prescribed PS caloric intake at EOT of each cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Percent Change From Baseline in Prescribed PS Caloric Intake at EOT of Each Cycle During Teduglutide Treatment

Time frame · Baseline, EOT of each cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 28 weeks, and Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Percent change from baseline in prescribed PS caloric intake at EOT of each cycle during teduglutide treatment was reported.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
Not reported
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Participant provides written informed consent (participant, parent or legal guardian and, as appropriate, informed assent) to participate in the study before completing any study-related procedures. 2. Participant completed the TED-C14-006 or SHP633-301 studies (including participants in the standard of care treatment arms). Participants are considered to have completed SHP633-301 if they completed study assessments through week 24. 3. Participant understands and is willing and able to fully adhere to study requirements as defined in this protocol. Exclusion Criteria: 1\. There are no exclusion criteria for this study.

Study locations

22 registered sites.

Belgium · Canada · Finland · Italy · United Kingdom · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Childrens Hospital Los Angeles - RHU

Los Angeles, California, United States

Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA

Los Angeles, California, United States

UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital

San Francisco, California, United States

Georgetown Children's Research Network

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Riley Hospital for Children

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Boston Children's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

The Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Columbia Unversity Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Children's Hosp. at Montefiore

The Bronx, New York, United States

Duke Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Texas Children's Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle, Washington, United States

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

Brussels, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium

Walter C. Mackenzie Health Science Centre

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Helsingin yliopistollinen keskussairaala

Helsinki, Finland

Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu

Roma, Italy

Great Ormond Children's Hosp

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Birmingham Children's Hospital

Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Related trials

More studies on Teduglutide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.