Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT04852679·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel® in Chinese Participants With GEP-NETs

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

43

Locations

14

Results

Posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This study will be conducted to support the registration of the lanreotide Autogel 120 mg formulation in China for the treatment of GEP-NETs and treatment of clinical symptoms of NETs. The study will include a screening period of up to 4 weeks followed by a 48-week intervention period. After completion of the main study period, five participants will continue in a self/partner injection cohort with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg every 28 days for 24 weeks.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Lanreotide autogel

Administered as deep subcutaneous (SC) injections

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Apr 21, 2021

  2. Study start

    May 24, 2021

  3. Primary completion

    Jun 10, 2022

  4. Study completion

    Jan 13, 2023

  5. Results posted

    Oct 1, 2024

  6. Registry updated

    Oct 1, 2024

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) of Tumour Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) at Week 24

Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24

The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or continued stable disease (SD) until the time of assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.

Secondary outcomes

Progression Free Survival (PFS) by BICR Within Weeks 24 and 48

Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48

The PFS was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of the first documented PD measured using RECIST criteria v1.1 and confirmed by BICR, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. The PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Overall Survival (OS) at the End of the Main Intervention Period

Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Week 48 (end of the main intervention period)

The OS was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of death from any cause. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time to Progression (TTP) During Main Intervention Period

Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

The TTP was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of the first documented PD, or clinical progression confirmed by the investigator. The TTP was assessed by BICR and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Percentage of Participants Alive and Without Tumour Progressive at Weeks 24 and 48

Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48

Percentage of participants who were alive and progression free per RECIST v1.1 using BICR assessments at 24 and 48 weeks after first dose of study intervention were reported. The PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Clinical Benefit Rate Assessed by BICR at Week 48

Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Week 48

The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or continued SD until the time of assessment according to RECIST criteria v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.

Overall Response Rate (ORR) at Weeks 24 and 48

Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48

The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR or confirmed PR. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.

Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 24 and 48

Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48

The DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR, confirmed PR or SD. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.

Number of Participants With Neuroendocrine Tumours (NET)-Related Clinical Symptoms at Weeks 24 and 48

Time frame · Weeks 24 and 48

The presence or absence of endocrine symptoms of NETs (example; flushing, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weakness, heartburn, nausea, vomiting, sweating, tremor, palpitation, or erythema) were assessed by the investigator at screening. In participants with symptoms of NETs at screening, a baseline assessment of the symptoms experienced in the last 4 weeks was performed by questioning before study intervention administration at Day 1. These symptoms were recorded in the case report form and severity graded upon National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Where, Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening and Grade 5= death.

Change From Baseline in Plasma Chromogranin A (CgA) at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

Time frame · Baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

The CgA determination was useful for staging, prognosis and follow up, since the serum concentration correlated to the tumour mass. Blood samples were collected to measure circulating CgA.

Change From Baseline in 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

Time frame · Baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

Urine samples were collected to measure 5-HIAA.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Capable of giving signed informed consent * Male or female of 18 years of age or older when informed consent is obtained * Has a histologically proven Grade 1 or 2 GEP-NET according to WHO (World Health Organisation) classification * Has an unresectable metastatic or locally advanced NET. * Has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status lower or equal to 2. Exclusion Criteria: * Participants with poorly differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC), high-grade GEP-NEC and goblet cell carcinoid. * Has been treated with octreotide acetate long-acting release or lanreotide acetate Autogel formulation within 8 weeks prior to screening tests or lanreotide PR 40 mg within 4 weeks prior to screening tests. * Has been treated with subcutaneous or intravenous octreotide acetate within 1 week prior to screening tests. * Has been treated with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors or multi-target tyrosine kinase (MTK) inhibitors within 4 weeks prior to screening tests.

Study locations

14 registered sites.

China. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Sciences

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Beijing Cancer Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital

Harbin, Heilongjiang, China

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

Zhengzhou, Henan, China

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Qilu Hospital Of Shandong University

Jinan, Shandong, China

Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

The First Affiliated Hospital Of Xi'an Jiaotong University

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

West China Hospital of Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

The First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Lanreotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.