Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT05073692·Not applicable·OBSERVATIONAL

Comparison of Type 2 Diabetes Pharmacotherapy Regimens

Status

Completed

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

241,981

Locations

6

Results

Posted

Publications

4

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This study is designed to help patients with type 2 diabetes and their clinicians: (a) identify which glucose lowering medications have the most favorable effects on heart health and other patient-important outcomes, (b) inform the timing of medication initiation, and (c) identify whether medication benefits apply equally to all adults with type 2 diabetes, or may be different based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, baseline heart health status, baseline renal function, or other factors.

Full detailed description

The study will conduct head-to-head comparisons of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment strategies using observational data from real-world clinical settings to assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes and other patient-centered outcomes in T2DM patients with moderate baseline CVD risk who are treated with each of these four classes of glucose-lowering medications known as SGLT2, GLP-1RA, DPP4, and SU. To mitigate bias concerns related to confounding and informative loss to follow-up, analyses will be based on modern causal inference methods combined with machine learning that emulate intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses of pragmatic randomized trials with active comparators to provide the most robust and precise estimates of relative and absolute effects we would expect in usual care settings. Specific Aims and Hypotheses: Aim 1. Compare the effect off SGLT21, GLP-1RA, DPP4, and SU on each study outcome in adults with T2DM when each type of medication is (a) initiated as second-line therapy after metformin, and (b) initiated as first-, second-, or third-line therapy, or after any history of glucose-lowering therapy independent of prior metformin use. Aim 2. Compare the effect on each study outcome of earlier versus later initiation of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, DPP4, SU as first-, or second-, or third-line therapy, or after any history of glucose-lowering therapy triggered by various changes in A1C, or CVD risk, or other patient characteristics. Aim 3. Assess in each of the prior analyses whether the treatment effects on study outcomes vary across categories of baseline CVD risk and CVD event history, renal function, congestive heart failure status, age, sex and race/ethnicity, or other patient characteristics. Glucose-lowering medications will be compared at both the class and agent level. The key outcomes that will be considered are MACE 3-point, Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Coronary or Carotid Artery Stent or Bypass Procedure, CVD Mortality, Overall Mortality. Additional patient-centered outcomes will be specified based on insights from stakeholder members of the research team.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

SU

Exposure to the class of drugs known as Sulfonylureas (SU)

DRUG

DPP4

Exposure to the class of drugs known as Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4)

DRUG

SGLT2i

Exposure to the class of drugs known as Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i)

DRUG

GLP-1RA

Exposure to the class of drugs known as Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA)

DRUG

SGLT2i or GLP-1RA

Exposure to either SGLT2i or GLP-1RA

DRUG

Linagliptin (DPP4)

Exposure to agent Linagliptin (DPP4)

DRUG

Exenatide (GLP-1RA)

Exposure to agent Exenatide (GLP1-RA)

DRUG

Liraglutide (GLP-1RA)

Exposure to agent Liraglutide (GLP-1RA)

DRUG

Empagliflozin (SGLT2i)

Exposure to agent Empagliflozin (SGLT2i)

DRUG

Glimepiride (SU)

Exposure to agent Glimepiride (SU)

DRUG

Glipizide (SU)

Exposure to Glimepiride (SU)

DRUG

Glimepiride (SU) or Glipizide (SU)

Exposure to agent Glimepiride (SU) or Glipizide (SU)

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Oct 11, 2021

  2. Study start

    Jul 1, 2021

  3. Primary completion

    Dec 31, 2024

  4. Study completion

    Mar 12, 2025

  5. Results posted

    Nov 21, 2025

  6. Registry updated

    Nov 21, 2025

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Incidence of 3-point Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

Time frame · 2.5 years

3-point MACE is defined as a single outcome measure, which is a composite measure of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular disease death.

Secondary outcomes

Not reported in the indexed record.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

* Dispensing of either of the set of drugs being compared * No prior dispensing of nor contraindication for any of the drugs compared * Evidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus diagnosis * Age 18 or older * Not currently pregnant * No evidence of dementia or short-term life expectancy from prior cancer diagnoses * History of ≥2 years of continuous health plan membership * ≥1 A1c test in the past 18 months

Study locations

6 registered sites.

United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Kaiser Permanente Southern California

Pasadena, California, United States

Romain S. Neugebauer

Pleasanton, California, United States

Kaiser Permanente Hawaii

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, United States

HealthPartners Institute

Bloomington, Minnesota, United States

Geisinger

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 38488777Thomas TW, Hooker SA, Schmittdiel JA. Principles for Stakeholder Engagement in Observational Health Research. JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240114. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0114.PMID 38745886Rodriguez LA, Finertie H, Neugebauer RS, Gosiker B, Thomas TW, Karter AJ, Gilliam LK, Oshiro C, An J, Simonson G, Cassidy-Bushrow AE, Dombrowski S, Nolan M, O'Connor PJ, Schmittdiel JA. Race and ethnicity and pharmacy dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 May 7;34:100759. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100759. eCollection 2024 Jun.PMID 40734551Thapa B, Schmittdiel JA, Arterburn D, Neugebauer R, Dyer W, O'Connor PJ, An J, Cassidy-Bushrow AE, Gilliam LK, Hooker SA, Nolan MB, Oshiro CES, Thomas T, Simonson G, Dombrowski SK, Rodriguez LA. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics Associated With Diabetes Remission in Six Integrated Health Care Systems: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Diabetes Care. 2025 Oct 1;48(10):1737-1743. doi: 10.2337/dc25-0530.PMID 41091469Neugebauer R, An J, Dombrowski SK, Oshiro C, Cassidy-Bushrow A, Gilliam L, Simonson G, Karter AJ, Bergenstal R, Finertie H, Yassin MM, Knowlton G, Lin SR, Dyer W, Pimentel N, Izadian K, Schmittdiel J, Thomas TW, Hooker SA, Nolan MB, Wright E, Aurora L, Rodriguez LA, Kaur J, Adams AS, van der Laan MJ, O'Connor PJ. Glucose-Lowering Medication Classes and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2536100. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36100.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Liraglutide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.