Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT05652205·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

A Study to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Symptoms With Linaclotide Versus Placebo in Pediatric Subjects, Ages 2 to 5 Years, With Functional Constipation

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

123

Locations

48

Results

Posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Functional constipation (FC) is a common healthcare problem in children of all ages, potentially due to genetic predisposition, inadequate fiber and fluid intake, and immobility. Currently, there are no pharmacological therapies approved for the treatment of FC. This study will assess adverse events and change in disease activity with linaclotide therapy in participants with FC. Linaclotide is an approved drug being developed for the treatment of FC in pediatric patients, ages 2 to 5, who meet modified Rome IV criteria for childhood FC. In Part 1 of this study, participants are placed in 1 of 2 groups, called treatment arms. Each group receives a different treatment. There is a 1 in 2 chance that participants will be assigned to placebo. All participants in Part 2 will receive linaclotide. Approximately 116 participants aged 2 to 5 years with FC will be enrolled in this study at around 45 sites worldwide. Participants will receive daily doses of oral Linaclotide capsules or matching placebo for 12 weeks in Part 1 of the study. In Part 2, the open label long-term safety extension, participants with FC who completed study intervention in Part 1 of Study M21-572 or the Phase 2 Study LIN-MD-67 will receive linaclotide for 24 weeks. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care (due to study procedures). Participants will attend visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Placebo for Linaclotide

Capsule; oral

DRUG

Linaclotide

Capsule; oral

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Dec 15, 2022

  2. Study start

    Dec 29, 2022

  3. Primary completion

    Sep 2, 2025

  4. Study completion

    Sep 2, 2025

  5. Results posted

    May 14, 2026

  6. Registry updated

    May 14, 2026

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Change From Baseline in 12-week Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) Frequency Rate (SBMs/Week) Observed by the Primary Caregiver During the Double-blind Study Intervention Period

Time frame · Baseline to Week 12

An SBM is defined as a BM that occurs in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM. The caregiver/parent/guardian/legally authorized representative (LAR) will complete the electronic diary (eDiary), providing data for the SBM frequency rate up to the last dose date equivalent to the 12-week SBM frequency rate. Baseline values for efficacy endpoints related to daily eDiary responses were derived from the eDiary in the preintervention period, specifically the time period from 14 days before randomization and up to the time of randomization.

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Time frame · From the time of study drug administration until 30 days or 5 half-lives after the last dose, up to 126 days in Period 1 and 226 days in Period 2

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient/clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product which doesn't necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.

Secondary outcomes

Change From Baseline in 12-week Stool Consistency Observed by the Primary Caregiver During the Double-blind Study Intervention Period

Time frame · Baseline to Week 12

The caregiver/parent/guardian/legally authorized representative (LAR) rated and recorded in an eDiary the consistency of the stool for each BM using the Bristol Stool Form 7-point scale in which 1=Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); 2=Sausage-shaped, but lumpy; 3=Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface; 4=Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5=Soft blobs with clear cut edges (easy to pass); 6=Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; and 7=Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid. A response of "I don't know" was considered as a missing score. Lower scores indicate firmer stool consistency. A subject's stool consistency score for the study intervention period is the average of the non-missing BSFS scores for the primary caregiver-observed SBMs during that specific period.

Change From Baseline in 12-week Straining Observed by the Primary Caregiver During the Double-blind Study Intervention Period

Time frame · Baseline to Week 12

The caregiver/parent/guardian/LAR rated and recorded in an eDiary the amount of straining they observed when the child passed the BM using two 3-point rating scales:. 1) For the bowel movement #X you were with the child for, did he/she grunt like he/she was straining? 0 = No, not at all; 1 = Yes, a little; 2 = Yes, a lot; I don't know. 2) For the bowel movement #X you were with the child for, did he/she make a face like he/she was straining? 0 = No, not at all; 1 = Yes, a little; 2 = Yes, a lot; I don't know. "I don't know" was considered a missing response. Higher scores indicate more straining. The subject's straining score was the average of the nonmissing average straining scores for all the primary caregiver-observed SBMs during the specific period.

Change From Baseline in 12-week Proportion of Days With Fecal Incontinence During the Double-blind Study Intervention Period (for Those With Toileting Skills)

Time frame · Baseline to Week 12

Caregivers of children who have acquired toileting skills for BMs were asked about their child's fecal incontinence episodes. Toileting skills were assessed as part of the first daily diary, modified daily diary, or clinic diary and responses were carried through to the completion of the study.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
2 Years
Maximum age
5 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Caregiver/parent/guardian/legally authorized representative (LAR) is willing and able to comply with procedures required in this protocol, prior to the initiation of any screening or study-specific procedures. In addition, the caregiver/parent/guardian/LAR who will be completing the electronic diary (eDiary) must be able to read and understand the assessments in the eDiary device and undergo training. * Participant meets modified Rome IV criteria for FC: For at least 1 month before Screening (Visit 1), the participant has had 2 or fewer defecations (with each defecation occurring in the absence of any laxative, suppository, or enema use during the preceding 24 hours) per week. In addition, at least once per week, participant must meet 1 or more of the following: * History of retentive posturing or excessive volitional stool retention. * History of painful or hard bowel movements (BMs). * Presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum. * History of large diameter stools. * At least 1 episode of fecal incontinence per week after the acquisition of toileting skills, if applicable. Exclusion Criteria: * Participant history of: * Celiac disease, or positive serological test for celiac disease or the condition is suspected but has not been ruled out by endoscopic biopsy * Cystic fibrosis * Hypothyroidism that is untreated or treated with thyroid hormone at a dose that has not been stable for at least 3 months prior to Screening (Visit 1) * Down's syndrome or any other chromosomal disorder * Active anal fissure (i.e., participant reports having streaks of blood on the stool or on toilet paper and/or pain/crying with BM within 2 weeks prior to Screening). (Note: anal fissures that have resolved at least 2 weeks prior to screening would not be exclusionary.) However, if in the investigator's opinion, an anal fissure(s) may be the primary cause of participant's modified Rome IV FC criteria, the participant would not be eligible to participate in the study. * Anatomic malformations (e.g., imperforate anus, anal stenosis, anterior displaced anus) * Intestinal nerve or muscle disorders (e.g., Hirschprung disease, visceral myopathies, visceral neuropathies) * Neuropathic conditions (e.g., spinal cord abnormalities, neurofibromatosis, tethered cord, spinal cord trauma) * Lead toxicity, hypercalcemia * Inflammatory bowel disease * Childhood functional abdominal pain syndrome * Poorly treated or poorly controlled psychiatric disorders that might influence his or her ability to participate in the study * Lactose intolerance that is associated with symptoms which could confound the assessments in this study * History of cancer. (Note: participants with a history of cancer are allowed provided that the malignancy has been in a complete remission before Randomization (Visit 2). A complete remission is defined as the disappearance of all signs of cancer in response to treatment.) * Has conditions that could interfere with drug absorption including but not limited to short bowel syndrome.

Study locations

48 registered sites.

Bulgaria · Netherlands · United Kingdom · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

G & L Research, LLC /ID# 250658

Foley, Alabama, United States

Velocity Clinical Research - Phoenix /ID# 266280

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

HealthStar Research of Hot Springs PLLC /ID# 249481

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Applied Research Center of Arkansas /ID# 249764

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Advanced Research Center /ID# 249412

Anaheim, California, United States

Kindred Medical Institute - Corona /ID# 249485

Corona, California, United States

Medical Ctr for Clin Research /ID# 254386

San Diego, California, United States

Prohealth Research Center /ID# 249420

Doral, Florida, United States

KIDZ Medical Services - Hollywood /ID# 250823

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Nemours Children's Health System /ID# 250881

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Kissimmee Clinical Research /ID# 252206

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

South Miami Medical & Research Group Inc. /ID# 249418

Miami, Florida, United States

Valencia Medical & Research Center /ID# 250452

Miami, Florida, United States

Palmetto Professional Research /ID# 250875

Miami, Florida, United States

South Florida Research Ph I-IV /ID# 252350

Miami Springs, Florida, United States

Velocity Clinical Research Macon /ID# 266516

Macon, Georgia, United States

Rophe Adult & Pediatric Medicine /ID# 250663

Union City, Georgia, United States

Michael W. Simon, MD, PSC /ID# 250664

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Velocity Clinical Research - Lafayette /ID# 266751

Lafayette, Louisiana, United States

Frederick County Pediatrics /ID# 249483

New Market, Maryland, United States

Michigan Center of Medical Research /ID# 251088

Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States

MNGI Digestive Health, P. A. /ID# 249676

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Velocity Clinical Research- Hastings Nebraska /ID# 252132

Hastings, Nebraska, United States

Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Campus, Doctors Office Center /ID# 250876

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Linaclotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.