Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT05658692·Phase 4·INTERVENTIONAL

Platform Adaptive Embedded Trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Status

Unknown

Phase

Phase 4

Enrollment

1,000

Locations

11

Results

Not posted

Publications

12

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Platform adaptive embedded trial for acute respiratory distress syndrome (PETARDS) is a randomized, embedded, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial for ARDS. The study aimed to assess the impact of multiple interventions on outcomes in patients with ARDS admitted to the ICU.

Full detailed description

Mortality is significantly higher in ARDS patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. ARDS patients admitted to the ICU typically receive multiple (as many as 10 or 20) treatments that work together to fight infection, reduce pulmonary exudation, improve oxygenation, and support systemic organ function. Clinicians are often willing to choose the exact or considered safe and effective regimen from the therapies mentioned above. Still, there are individual differences in ARDS patients, and it is difficult to confirm the optimal treatment plan. It is inevitable to choose treatment without evidence-based medicine based on experience. The primary purpose of this study was to help physicians select the best-effective approach among existing ARDS therapies, and secondly to provide a rationale for specific empirical or emerging ARDS treatments. Clinical evidence to guide optimal management is best obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, ARDS is a multi-causal, clinically and therapeutically heterogeneous clinical syndrome with rapid disease progression and complex clinical manifestations, in fact, difficult to organize RCT trials. In cases where the timing of onset and the pathophysiological mechanism cannot be determined, the initial treatment is the selection of protective ventilation/controlled infusion as the first-line standard therapy according to the Berlin classification of ARDS, and some second-line treatments with potential clinical benefit. It is difficult to conduct objective, scientific and timely evaluation, and the overall treatment plan is inevitably blind and empirical. This clinical operation mode is likely related to ARDS-related RCT research results. The results are unsatisfactory, the treatment response heterogeneity is high, and the outcome events vary greatly. closely related to the clinical status. The adaptive platform trial PETARDS is ideal for evaluating the effects of highly heterogeneous ARDS treatment strategies. This clinical research design (adaptive platform trial, APT) can use the information of patients who are participating in the study to guide the clinical treatment of subsequent newly enrolled patients. The APT trial randomized patients into multiple domains for multiple interventions to assess their effectiveness in different patients. The term "domain" refers to a common treatment unit (eg, steroid therapy) within which patients can be randomly assigned to several interventional (dose) groups (including controls, such as no steroids, as appropriate). Certainly). All trial procedures consist of a primary or "core" protocol and multiple secondary protocols, and the standard protocols, clinical treatment adaptations, and trial management and practices for specific treatment units are managed in a unified manner for each treatment unit. The core protocol, secondary protocols, and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) of this trial are presented in the appendix; the study required approval from the relevant ethics committees of all participating hospitals and was conducted by good clinical practice guidelines and principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DEVICE

protective ventilation

Patients with moderate to severe ARDS received ventilation treatment according to predicted body weight(PBW) and controlled plateau pressure.

BEHAVIORAL

prone position ventilation

patients with moderate to severe ARDS who don't have contraindications were given prone ventilation for over 12 hours.

DRUG

glucocorticoid therapy

Dexamethasone: Patients received intravenous dexamethasone 20 mg daily from days 1 to 5, reduced to 10 mg daily from days 6 to 10. Hydrocortisone:For septic ARDS patients, 50 mg of hydrocortisone was given as an intravenous bolus every 6 hours for 7 days; For patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, The corticosteroid field randomized participants to a fixed 7-day period of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg or 100 mg every 6 hours).

OTHER

restrictive fluid resuscitation

1. without other organ dysfunction patients: Minimize fluid was given; 2. other ARDS patients: In the resuscitation phase, controlled fluid replacement combined with vasoactive drugs was given; multiple measures were taken, like lactate and so on, to utilizedto guide fluid resuscitation therapy; diuretics or diuretics in combination with albumin to achieve fluid balance.

BIOLOGICAL

Thymosin Alpha

People received thymosin Alpha subcutaneous injections, twice a week.

DRUG

Muscle relaxant therapy

Deep sedation combined with intermittent bolus injection of muscle relaxant or deep sedation combined with continuous infusion of muscle relaxant

OTHER

Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Treatment

1. ventilation; 2. conventional western medicine treatment; 3. Chinese herbal medicine(Determining medication based on syndrome differentiation)

DRUG

statin therapy

1. Simvastatin: 80mg qd po for not more than 28days; 2. Rosuvastatin: 20mg qd po (40mg for the first time) for 28days or 3 days after transfer out of the ICU, or the patient died.

COMBINATION_PRODUCT

anti-infective treatment

According to "Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021".

DEVICE

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation(ECMO)

1. For severe ARDS patients with refractory hypoxemia within 7 days of onset; 2. (Inspiratory oxygen concentration) ≥ 0.80, tidal volume 6ml/kg (PBW), positive end-expiratory pressure \[PEEP\] ≥ 10 cmH2O; 3. V-V Model.

GENETIC

stem cell therapy

A single injection of bone marrow stem cells, doses of 1, 5, 10\*106 cells/kg was taken according to the previous clinical studies.

DRUG

Sedative analgesia/muscle relaxant therapy

Deep sedation combined with intermittent bolus injection of muscle relaxant or deep sedation combined with continuous infusion of muscle relaxant

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Dec 21, 2022

  2. Study start

    Oct 1, 2022

  3. Primary completion

    Oct 2023

  4. Study completion

    Dec 2023

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Dec 21, 2022

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

ventilator-free days

Time frame · within 28 days

Ventilator-free days 28 days after randomization, definition: Survival without mechanical ventilation

Secondary outcomes

Clinical status assessment

Time frame · 15 days

Patients' clinical status (6-point scale score) was assessed on day 15 after randomization, Definition: This scale ranges from 1 (no hospitalization) to 6 (death), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

All-Cause Mortality

Time frame · within 28 days

All-cause mortality 28 days after randomization

Duration of mechanical ventilation

Time frame · within 28 days

days of mechanical ventilation

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

Time frame · at 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after randomization

SOFA Score for different times, from 0 to 24 points

ICU stay time

Time frame · within 90 days

The time for patients staying in ICU when they were in the hospital.

Hospital stay

Time frame · within 90 days

The whole time patients lived in the hospital, including the time when they lived in the ICU

Organ failure free days

Time frame · within 28 days

Patients got ARDS, but the other organs were not injury.

Health-related quality of life assessment, EQ5D-5L and WHODAS 2.0

Time frame · within 6 months

Patient's life quality was assessed according to EQ5D-5L. If the patient had severe impairment of organ function within 6 months, evaluated the patient's quality of life according to WHODAS 2.0

Proportion of intubated patients undergoing tracheostomy

Time frame · 28 days

ARDS patients received tracheostomy.

Where the patient went after discharge

Time frame · No recurrence within 90 days

Home, rehabilitation hospital, nursing home or long-term care facility, or other emergency hospital

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients (18 years and older, regardless of gender) admitted to the ICU with ARDS; Intubation and mechanical ventilation; Moderate/severe ARDS defined by Berlin criteria (PaO2/FiO2 ≤200mmHg, PEEP ≥5cmH20); Moderate/severe ARDS less than 48 hours before randomization. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy or breastfeeding; Known allergy to the intervention drug; Daily use of an intervention drug or measure within the past 15 days; Intervention drugs or measures primarily intended to treat other conditions (eg, septic shock); Patients using the intervention drug or standard for two or more days during hospitalization; Patients are expected to die within the next 24 hours; Other: Participated in PETARDS in the past 90 days.

Study locations

11 registered sites.

China. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Beijing, China

West China Hospital,Sichuan University

Chengdu, China

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Guangdong, China

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

Harbin, China

Lanxi People's Hospital

Lanxi, China

Ningbo First Hospital

Ningbo, China

Zhognshang hospital, Fudan University

Shanghai, China

Taizhou Hosptial of Zhejiang Province

Taizhou, China

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Wuhan, China

Wuhan University Renmin Hospital

Wuhan, China

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

Zhengzhou, China

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 34599691Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available.PMID 10793162Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.PMID 23688302Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.PMID 28940011Annane D, Pastores SM, Rochwerg B, Arlt W, Balk RA, Beishuizen A, Briegel J, Carcillo J, Christ-Crain M, Cooper MS, Marik PE, Umberto Meduri G, Olsen KM, Rodgers S, Russell JA, Van den Berghe G. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in critically ill patients (Part I): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1751-1763. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4919-5. Epub 2017 Sep 21.PMID 33150472Meduri GU, Annane D, Confalonieri M, Chrousos GP, Rochwerg B, Busby A, Ruaro B, Meibohm B. Pharmacological principles guiding prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2284-2296. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06289-8. Epub 2020 Nov 4.PMID 32043986Villar J, Ferrando C, Martinez D, Ambros A, Munoz T, Soler JA, Aguilar G, Alba F, Gonzalez-Higueras E, Conesa LA, Martin-Rodriguez C, Diaz-Dominguez FJ, Serna-Grande P, Rivas R, Ferreres J, Belda J, Capilla L, Tallet A, Anon JM, Fernandez RL, Gonzalez-Martin JM; dexamethasone in ARDS network. Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Mar;8(3):267-276. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30417-5. Epub 2020 Feb 7.PMID 33169217Vignon P, Evrard B, Asfar P, Busana M, Calfee CS, Coppola S, Demiselle J, Geri G, Jozwiak M, Martin GS, Gattinoni L, Chiumello D. Fluid administration and monitoring in ARDS: which management? Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2252-2264. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06310-0. Epub 2020 Nov 9.PMID 29789983Malbrain MLNG, Van Regenmortel N, Saugel B, De Tavernier B, Van Gaal PJ, Joannes-Boyau O, Teboul JL, Rice TW, Mythen M, Monnet X. Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D's and the four phases of fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 May 22;8(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0402-x.PMID 16714767National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2564-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062200. Epub 2006 May 21.PMID 33104824Alhazzani W, Belley-Cote E, Moller MH, Angus DC, Papazian L, Arabi YM, Citerio G, Connolly B, Denehy L, Fox-Robichaud A, Hough CL, Laake JH, Machado FR, Ostermann M, Piraino T, Sharif S, Szczeklik W, Young PJ, Gouskos A, Kiedrowski K, Burns KEA. Neuromuscular blockade in patients with ARDS: a rapid practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;46(11):1977-1986. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06227-8. Epub 2020 Oct 26.PMID 20843245Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.PMID 22985805McAuley DF, Laffey JG, O'Kane CM, Cross M, Perkins GD, Murphy L, McNally C, Crealey G, Stevenson M; HARP-2 investigators; Irish Critical Care Trials Group. Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibition with simvastatin in acute lung injury to reduce pulmonary dysfunction (HARP-2) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Sep 17;13:170. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-170.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Thymosin Alpha-1.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.