Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT05847660·Not applicable·INTERVENTIONAL

Progesterone Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Versus Antagonist Protocol for PCO Patient

Status

Unknown

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

210

Locations

0

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

this study is designed to compare the Progesterone primed ovarian stimulation protocol versus the antagonist protocol as a method to stimulate PCO patients in ICSI cycles to decrease cost and decrease OHSS.

Full detailed description

A Randomized controlled, non-blinded study (parallel-group study with 1:1 randomization) will be conducted at a Specialized Authorized IVF unit starting from January 2023 till completing the sample size. Randomization will be generated by a computer and held with one of the experimenters, and (n) of the black and red cards will be used for allocation concealment. Participants: All PCO patients will be given informed consent about the study aims and written consent will be taken at the first visit to the infertility clinic of the Specialized Authorized IVF unit. Patients will be categorized as (Group A) Progesterone primed ovarian stimulation protocol. (Group B) conventional antagonist protocol.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Progesterone antagonist

Group (A): Women in progesterone primed (PPOS) will prescribed 30 mg oral dose of dydrogesterone (duphaston, Abbott, Egypt) from the 2nd day of the cycle and continued until triggering day. Vaginal sonography will be done for all patients since the 6th day of the cycle.

DRUG

conventional antagonist protocol

Group (B): Women in the antagonist group will be monitored by transvaginal ultrasonography till the size of dominant follicles reached to 12-13 mm, 0.25 mg of cetrotide (Merck-Serono ,Germany) will be injected subcutaneously daily and continued until triggering day, follow up for all patients in both groups by transvaginal ultrasound every other day.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    May 6, 2023

  2. Study start

    Jun 1, 2023

  3. Primary completion

    Jun 1, 2024

  4. Study completion

    Jul 1, 2024

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    May 6, 2023

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

The number of oocytes retrieved per patient

Time frame · 12 months

The number of oocyte retieved by ovum pick up after controlled ovarien stimulation

The number of MII oocytes/per patient

Time frame · 12 months

the grade of maturity of oocyte under microscope

The fertilization rate/per patient.

Time frame · 12 months

The number of fertilized oocyte by sperm

Number of frozen embryos/per patient

Time frame · 12 month

the number of embryo frozen

Secondary outcomes

Incidence of early OHSS yes /no

Time frame · 12 months

size of th overies , presence of ascitis , pain and

Pregnancy outcomes

Time frame · 12 months

1. Chemical pregnancy will be determined by serum β hCG \> 50 IU/L two weeks after ET. 2. In addition, clinical pregnancy will be confirmed by detecting fetal heartbeats 2 weeks following the positive β hCG.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
20 Years
Maximum age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria: \- 1. PCO patients based on Rotterdam criteria (2003), including polycystic ovaries, oligo-anovulation, as well as the biochemical or clinical signs of hyperandrogenism (Rotterdam et al, 2003). 2\. Age less than 40 years old. 3. Primary infertility for 2 years and secondary infertility for 1 year. Exclusion Criteria: \- Non-PCO patients as: * Congenital adrenal hyperplasia * Hyperprolactinemia. * Recurrent implantation failure. * Hydrosalpinx. * Uterine pathology. * Uncontrolled medical disorder eg DM, HTN * Male factor infertility.

Study locations

0 registered sites.

No country data reported. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

No study locations reported.

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Cetrorelix.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.