Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT07128394·Not applicable·INTERVENTIONAL

Extra Luteinizing Hormone Improve Embryo Quality in IVF Patients With Low LH During Long GnRH-Agonist Treatment

Status

Recruiting

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

590

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

10

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether supplementation with exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) can improve embryo quality in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with a long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol who have excessive suppression of LH. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either exogenous LH supplementation or standard care. The primary outcome is embryo quality, and secondary outcomes include pregnancy rates and safety assessments. The study is conducted at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University.

Full detailed description

Excessive suppression of luteinizing hormone (LH) during ovarian stimulation with a long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol has been associated with suboptimal follicular development, impaired oocyte maturation, and reduced embryo quality. LH plays a critical role in the final stages of folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis, and ovulation, and its deficiency during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation may adversely affect the developmental competence of oocytes. This randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate whether supplementation with exogenous LH can improve embryo quality in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with excessive LH suppression during a long GnRH-a protocol. Eligible participants are women meeting predefined hormonal suppression criteria prior to or during stimulation. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either exogenous LH supplementation in addition to standard ovarian stimulation or standard care without LH supplementation. The primary endpoint is the proportion of high-quality embryos obtained per cycle. Secondary endpoints include clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, live birth rate, and safety outcomes such as incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and adverse events. The study aims to provide high-quality evidence to guide the optimal management of patients with profound LH suppression during controlled ovarian stimulation. Findings from this trial may contribute to refining stimulation protocols and improving reproductive outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone (rLH)

Recombinant LH administered subcutaneously in combination with recombinant FSH (rFSH) at a ratio of 2:1 starting on stimulation day, continued throughout controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Dosage adjusted according to follicular growth and serum hormone levels.

DRUG

Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rFSH)

Recombinant FSH administered subcutaneously for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation after pituitary downregulation with a long-acting GnRH agonist. Dosage adjusted based on follicular development and hormone monitoring.

DRUG

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a)

Long-acting GnRH agonist (3.75 mg) administered subcutaneously on menstrual cycle day 2-4 for pituitary downregulation before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Aug 19, 2025

  2. Study start

    Feb 1, 2024

  3. Primary completion

    Sep 30, 2026

  4. Study completion

    Nov 30, 2026

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Aug 19, 2025

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Proportion of cycles with no usable embryos

Time frame · 7 days after oocyte retrieval

The number of IVF/ICSI cycles with no transferable embryos divided by the total number of oocyte retrieval cycles, evaluated based on embryo morphology and grading on Day 3 or Day 5-6 after fertilization.

Secondary outcomes

Number of high-quality Day 3 embryos

Time frame · 7 days after oocyte retrieval

Count of embryos meeting morphological criteria for high quality on Day 3 after fertilization, as determined by standard embryology scoring.

Total gonadotropin dose used

Time frame · At the end of ovarian stimulation (average 8-12 days)

Cumulative dose (IU) of gonadotropins administered from stimulation start to trigger day.

Duration of gonadotropin stimulation

Time frame · At the end of ovarian stimulation (average 8-12 days)

Number of days from gonadotropin initiation to trigger day.

Number of oocytes retrieved

Time frame · At oocyte retrieval (36-38 hours after trigger)

Total number of oocytes collected during transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval.

Clinical pregnancy rate

Time frame · 30 days after embryo transfer

Proportion of embryo transfer cycles resulting in at least one intrauterine gestational sac with fetal heartbeat, confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound.

Early miscarriage rate

Time frame · Within 12 weeks of gestation

Proportion of clinical pregnancies ending in miscarriage before 12 completed weeks of gestation.

Live birth rate

Time frame · At delivery (up to 1 year after embryo transfer)

Proportion of embryo transfer cycles resulting in the delivery of at least one live-born infant.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
20 Years
Maximum age
37 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Women aged 20 to 37 years (inclusive). Diagnosed with infertility and undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment using the long-acting GnRH agonist protocol. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) level \<0.5 U/L after pituitary downregulation. Normal uterine cavity as confirmed by hysteroscopy, sonohysterography, or hysterosalpingography within 6 months. Written informed consent provided prior to participation. Exclusion Criteria: * Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). History of recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Presence of endometriosis or adenomyosis. History of ovarian surgery. Ovarian cysts ≥3 cm or with suspected malignancy. Poor ovarian reserve (antral follicle count \<5, anti-Müllerian hormone \<1.1 ng/mL, or baseline FSH \>10 IU/L). Chromosomal abnormalities in either partner. Systemic diseases such as uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, thyroid disorders, or autoimmune diseases. Contraindications to ovarian stimulation medications or pregnancy.

Study locations

1 registered sites.

China. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 25237892Yazici Yilmaz F, Gorkemli H, Colakoglu MC, Aktan M, Gezginc K. The evaluation of recombinant LH supplementation in patients with suboptimal response to recombinant FSH undergoing IVF treatment with GnRH agonist down-regulation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Feb;31(2):141-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.965675. Epub 2014 Sep 19.PMID 12456612Tesarik J, Mendoza C. Effects of exogenous LH administration during ovarian stimulation of pituitary down-regulated young oocyte donors on oocyte yield and developmental competence. Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3129-37. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3129.PMID 3108319Wu KK, Papp AC, Manner CE, Hall ER. Interaction between lymphocytes and platelets in the synthesis of prostacyclin. J Clin Invest. 1987 Jun;79(6):1601-6. doi: 10.1172/JCI112995.PMID 30973022Kan O, Simsir C, Atabekoglu CS, Sonmezer M. The impact of adding hp-hMG in r-FSH started GnRH antagonist cycles on ART outcome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;35(10):869-872. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1600667. Epub 2019 Apr 11.PMID 21839437Propst AM, Hill MJ, Bates GW, Palumbo M, Van Horne AK, Retzloff MG. Low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin may improve in vitro fertilization cycle outcomes in patients with low luteinizing hormone levels after gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration. Fertil Steril. 2011 Oct;96(4):898-904. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.069. Epub 2011 Aug 11.PMID 31110533Tayyar AT, Kahraman S. Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only. Arch Med Sci. 2019 May;15(3):673-679. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.72408. Epub 2018 Jan 8.PMID 10875848Fleming R, Rehka P, Deshpande N, Jamieson ME, Yates RW, Lyall H. Suppression of LH during ovarian stimulation: effects differ in cycles stimulated with purified urinary FSH and recombinant FSH. Hum Reprod. 2000 Jul;15(7):1440-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.7.1440.PMID 10783342Westergaard LG, Laursen SB, Andersen CY. Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2000 May;15(5):1003-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1003.PMID 16790105Alviggi C, Clarizia R, Mollo A, Ranieri A, De Placido G. Outlook: who needs LH in ovarian stimulation? Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 May;12(5):599-607. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61186-8.PMID 32470947Li F, Ye T, Kong H, Li J, Hu L, Jin H, Su Y, Li G. Efficacies of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in poor ovarian responders classified by the POSEIDON criteria. Aging (Albany NY). 2020 May 29;12(10):9354-9364. doi: 10.18632/aging.103210. Epub 2020 May 29.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Triptorelin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.