Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT07350317·Phase 4·INTERVENTIONAL

Trial Comparing Subcutaneous Natural Progesterone (Prolutex) vs. Cetrorelix Acetate for Luteinizing Hormone Surge Suppression in Freeze-All IVF Cycles.

Status

Not yet recruiting

Phase

Phase 4

Enrollment

230

Locations

0

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is critical for optimizing outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Cetrorelix acetate, a GnRH (Gonadotropin releasing hormone) antagonist administered subcutaneously, is the current standard for luteinizing hormone suppression. However, natural progesterone in a novel subcutaneous formulation (Prolutex) may offer a viable alternative. Prolutex is a water-soluble complex of natural progesterone with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPBCD), patented as US Patent No. 4,727,064 Pitha, Jallowing for subcutaneous injection. This may simplify treatment and improve patient compliance. Progesterone forms are well studied and used globally/in UAE to suppress Luteinizing Hormone surge. It is an example of off-label use, which becomes a standard indication for use of progesterone. Several studies have demonstrated that exogenous progesterone can effectively suppress Luteinizing Hormone release while maintaining follicular development and oocyte competence. Furthermore, progestin-based protocols are potentially more cost-effective and similar to administer compared to GnRH (Gonadotropin releasing hormone) antagonists. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial directly comparing a subcutaneous progesterone formulation (Prolutex) with cetrorelix acetate, administered via the same route, in terms of luteinizing hormone surge suppression. For this specific research, there are no relevant published studies available. This Randomised controlled trial will be done to address the research gap and compare the two already approved standard of care medications to see if Prolutex can be used as a viable alternative to suppress Luteinizing Hormone levels.

Full detailed description

Title: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Subcutaneous Natural Progesterone (Prolutex) vs. Cetrorelix Acetate for Luteinizing Hormone Surge Suppression in Freeze-All IVF Cycles. 1. Principal Investigator: Prof. Ahmed Elbohoty, MSc, MD, FRCOG, EFRM Trust Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE Email: ahmed.elbohoty@trustfertility.com Co-Investigators: Dr Walid Sayed - Group Medical Director Trust Fertility Clinic Dr Irfan Aslam - Group IVF Lab director Trust Fertility Clinic Dr Amani Kanan - Specialist Obstetrics and Gynaecology Dr Nayrouz Gezaf - Specialist Obstetrics and Gynaecology Study Registration: To be registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Ethics Approval: To be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Burjeel Holdings Standard IVF Procedures Under Institutional Coverage: All procedures-ovarian stimulation, hormone monitoring, and oocyte retrieval-are identical to routine clinical practice already being conducted at Trust fertility clinic - Burjeel Medical City. Participants will receive the same monitoring and safety precautions as standard IVF patients. No additional interventions will be introduced, and all clinical care will remain within the framework of the institution's established protocols. Both the investigators and the institution are covered under existing malpractice and liability insurance policies, which apply to all routine fertility procedures. Ethical Safeguards in Place: Participants will provide detailed informed consent, outlining all aspects of the protocol, including the use of approved medications and the lack of deviation from standard care. 2. Background: The prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is critical for optimizing outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Cetrorelix acetate, a GnRH (Gonadotropin releasing hormone) antagonist administered subcutaneously, is the current standard for luteinizing hormone suppression. However, natural progesterone in a novel subcutaneous formulation (Prolutex) may offer a viable alternative. Prolutex is a water-soluble complex of natural progesterone with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPBCD), patented as US Patent No. 4,727,064 (Pitha, J.), allowing for subcutaneous injection. This may simplify treatment and improve patient compliance. Progesterone forms are well studied and used globally/in UAE to suppress Luteinizing Hormone surge. It is an example of off-label use, which becomes a standard indication for use of progesterone. Several studies have demonstrated that exogenous progesterone can effectively suppress Luteinizing Hormone release while maintaining follicular development and oocyte competence. Furthermore, progestin-based protocols are potentially more cost-effective and similar to administer compared to GnRH (Gonadotropin releasing hormone) antagonists. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial directly comparing a subcutaneous progesterone formulation (Prolutex) with cetrorelix acetate, administered via the same route, in terms of luteinizing hormone surge suppression. For this specific research, there are no relevant published studies available. This Randomised controlled trial will be done to address the research gap and compare the two already approved standard of care medications to see if Prolutex can be used as a viable alternative to suppress Luteinizing Hormone levels. Study Objectives: Primary Objective: To evaluate whether subcutaneous natural progesterone (Prolutex) is non-inferior to Cetrorelix Acetate in preventing premature ovulation in freeze-all IVF cycles. 3. Secondary Objectives: To compare the number of retrieved oocytes, MII rate, fertilization rate, and blastocyst formation rate To assess duration of ovarian stimulation To monitor hormone levels (luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone) To evaluate patient tolerability, comfort, and adherence To compare cost-effectiveness of both protocols Study Design: Design: Prospective, Phase IV, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial Setting: Trust Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE Randomization: 1:1 block randomization, stratified by age and ovarian reserve Arms: Control Group (A): Cetrorelix acetate 0.25 mg Subcutaneously daily from day 5 to trigger Test Group (B): Natural progesterone 25 mg Subcutaneously (Prolutex) daily from day 5 to trigger 4. Sample Size Justification: Based on previous studies, the incidence of premature ovulation in GnRH (Gonadotropin releasing hormone) antagonist cycles is \~5% (Griesinger et al., 2016; Vuong et al., 2021). A non-inferiority margin of 5% (i.e., 10% total threshold) is selected, aligned with clinical tolerance standards (Fatemi et al., 2019). With α = 0.05 (one-sided) and 80% power, the minimum sample required is 102 per group. Allowing for a 10% dropout, the total enrolment target is 230 participants (115 per group). Data will be populated in excel and the data collection form will be attached to the participant file and upload to the secure study database. 5. Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: Women aged 18-40 years Body Mass Index \< 35 kg/m² Antral Follicle Count ≥ 8 or Anti-Müllerian Hormone ≥ 1.2 ng/mL Undergoing freeze-all IVF (for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - OHSS risk, PGT- Preimplantation Genetic Testing, or personal preference) Exclusion Criteria: Poor responders (Bologna criteria) Stage III-IV endometriosis Pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction Planned fresh embryo transfer Severe Male Factor. Semen Count \<1 ×〖10〗\^6 (\<1 Million/ml) or Azoospermia) 6. Stimulation Protocol: Stimulation: Ovarian stimulation will begin between Cycle Day 2 and Cycle Day 5 of spontaneous or withdrawal-induced menstruation, as determined by physician assessment and baseline ultrasound and hormonal evaluation. Ovarian stimulation will be performed using human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) or recombinant FSH, based on physician discretion and patient characteristics. Starting dose (typically 150-300 IU daily) will be individualized based on age, BMI (body mass index), AMH (Anti Mullerian Hormone), and Antral Follicle Count The choice of gonadotropin will be documented, and distribution between study arms will be analyzed to ensure balance. LUTEINIZING HORMONE Suppression: Cetrorelix acetate 0.25 mg Subcutaneously (control) Natural progesterone 25 mg Subcutaneously (Prolutex) (intervention) Starting on stimulation day 5 until the day of ovulation trigger Trigger: Either Triptorelin 0.2 mg Subcutaneously or recombinant hCG (Human Chorionic Gonadotropin), per physician assessment Oocyte Retrieval: 36 hours post-trigger Embryo Handling: Blastocyst culture followed by vitrification for all embryos (with or without embryo biopsy) Standard IVF Procedures Under Institutional Coverage: All Procedures - ovarian stimulation, hormone monitoring, and oocyte retrieval - are identical to routine clinical practice already being conducted at Trust Fertility Clinic - Burjeel Medical City. Participants will receive the same monitoring and safety precautions as standard IVF patients. No additional interventions will be introduced, and all clinical care will remain within the framework of the institution's established protocols. The study treatment and assessments will be covered by patient medical insurance/self-pay as these are considered standards of care. There are no additional expected risks beyond what the participants would typically encounter in a standard IVF cycle, in which case patient will receive appropriate medical care from the hospital in line with their insurance/self-pay coverage. 7. Monitoring and Hormonal Assessment: Monitoring Schedule: Ultrasound folliculometry will be the primary tool for monitoring follicular development and detecting premature ovulation. Transvaginal ultrasound assessments will be performed on: Stimulation Day 5 Stimulation Day 8 Trigger Day Each scan will evaluate: Number and size of growing follicles Ovarian response to stimulation Signs of follicular rupture or collapse Presence of free fluid in the pouch of Douglas Serum Luteinizing Hormone, estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P4) will be measured on the same days for hormonal profiling. In the Prolutex group, elevated progesterone is expected due to exogenous administration and will not be used to define premature ovulation. Ultrasound-based folliculometry will serve as the primary diagnostic tool for premature ovulation. Serum Luteinizing Hormone levels will be recorded as supportive data only. 8. Safety Monitoring: Incidence and grading of OHSS- Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Local injection reactions Patients will be followed up for any side effects/ reactions or complications. All such cases will be reported to the Principal Investigator. Minimal Risk Profile: This is a Phase IV, investigator-initiated study involving two medications-Cetrorelix acetate and natural progesterone (Prolutex®)-both of which are: Licensed and widely used in routine clinical practice; Administered within their approved clinical indications for LH suppression and luteal support in IVF; Associated with a well-established safety profile, with no investigational or experimental compounds introduced. There are no additional risks to participants beyond what they would typically encounter in a standard IVF cycle. Not a First-in-Human or High-Risk Study: Cetrorelix is a widely used GnRH antagonist, and Prolutex® is a subcutaneous formulation of bioidentical progesterone, complexed with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, and has been shown in multiple studies to be both effective and well-tolerated and even safer that oral synthetic progestins. This study does not involve dose escalation, novel administration techniques, or vulnerable populations. It is…

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Control Group (A):

Control Group (A): Cetrorelix acetate 0.25 mg Subcutaneously daily from day 5 to trigger

DRUG

Test Group (B):

prolutex

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jan 20, 2026

  2. Study start

    Jan 2026

  3. Primary completion

    Dec 2026

  4. Study completion

    Feb 2027

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Jan 20, 2026

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Primary Outcome:

Time frame · 2 weeks within administration

Ultrasound evidence of follicular rupture, including: 1. Disappearance or collapse of dominant follicles 2. Appearance of free fluid in the posterior cul-de-sac3. Absence of expected follicular structure

Secondary outcomes

secondary outcomes

Time frame · 2 weeks after stimulation

Number of oocytes retrieved

maturation rate

Time frame · 2 weeks after stimulation

• MII oocyte rate

• Fertilization rate

Time frame · 2 days after egg collection

fertilized number of m2 injected oocystes

• Blastocyst formation rate

Time frame · 3 weeks after stimulation

number of embryos reaching blastocysts

• Duration of stimulation (in days)

Time frame · 10 to 14 days from start

duration of stimulation in days

• Hormonal profile (Luteinizing Hormone, Estradiol, Progesterone)

Time frame · 2 weeks duration from start of stimulation

numeric hormone level

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Women aged 18-40 years. 2. Body Mass Index \< 35 kg/m² 3. Antral Follicle Count ≥ 8 or Anti-Müllerian Hormone ≥ 1.2 ng/mL 4. Undergoing freeze-all IVF (for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - OHSS risk, PGT- Preimplantation Genetic Testing, or personal preference) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Poor responders (Bologna criteria) 2. Stage III-IV endometriosis 3. Pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction 4. Planned fresh embryo transfer 5. Severe Male Factor. Semen Count \<1 ×〖10〗\^6 (\<1 Million/ml) or Azoospermia)

Study locations

0 registered sites.

No country data reported. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

No study locations reported.

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Cetrorelix.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.