Oxytocin Bolus Versus Infusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section (INBOX-HR)

Oxytocin is the most commonly used uterotonic agent worldwide to achieve adequate uterine tone and prevent postpartum hemorrhage. Over the past decade, the trend has been towards lowering the dose to reduce oxytocin-related adverse effects including nausea, hypotension, chest pain, EKG changes, and maternal death. However, the optimal strategy for oxytocin administration remains controversial. A prior study was conducted at Stony Brook University Hospital which investigated the difference between bolus versus infusion administration of oxytocin in elective cesarean section patients with a low risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH); the results of this randomized, double blinded clinical trial showed that bolus was not superior for adequate uterine tone at 2 minutes when compared to infusion of oxytocin, but blood loss was modestly lower and total oxytocin exposure was substantially lower in the bolus arm. Which makes the most logical next question: Does bolus oxytocin become more clinically meaningful in patients with higher baseline risk for uterine atony or hemorrhage. The investigators aim to address this question with the INBOX-HR study. INBOX-HR acts as a continuing investigation on the difference between bolus versus infusion administration of oxytocin, specifically for patients that are at a high risk for postpartum hemorrhage. Thus, the purpose of this research study is to compare bolus and infusion administration of oxytocin on parturients at high risk for postpartum hemorrhage undergoing elective cesarean section. The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that administration by bolus vs. infusion results in more rapid achievement of adequate uterine tone in this patient population. Secondary objectives include determining estimated blood loss, prevalence of hypotension, change in heart rate, nausea, vomiting, and patient satisfaction, and 0 - 10 uterine tone score.