Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT00775684·Not applicable·INTERVENTIONAL

Effect of Exenatide, Sitagliptin or Glimepiride on Functional ß -Cell Mass

Status

Completed

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

47

Locations

3

Results

Posted

Publications

7

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This study evaluates exenatide, sitagliptin, and glimepiride for the treatment of high blood sugar in patients with impaired fasting glucose or early type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this study is to determine if exenatide and sitagliptin increase the amount of insulin made by the pancreas compared to glimepiride. It is hypothesized that exenatide or sitagliptin will sustain or increase the amount of insulin made by the pancreas in comparison to glimepiride.

Full detailed description

The incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has reached epidemic proportions throughout the world. In the United States more than 1.5 million new cases of diabetes were diagnosed in 2005, and the estimated prevalence of the disease was over 20 million. Another 54 million Americans are believed to have impaired fasting glucose, which represents a "pre-diabetic" state at increased risk for progression to overt diabetes. T2D ultimately results from an inadequate mass of functional beta-cells, where insufficient beta-cell compensation for insulin resistance leads to the development of impaired glucose tolerance and eventually diabetes. Autopsy studies have demonstrated a decreased beta-cell mass occurring with fasting glucose \> 110 mg/dl, consistent with functional studies that demonstrate decreased beta-cell (insulin) secretory capacity beginning in the range of impaired fasting glucose. Strategies that might preserve or expand functional beta-cell mass in vivo would be expected to reverse the progressive deterioration in blood glucose control seen with diabetes. One such strategy involves the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), which is trophic for islet beta-cells, having both pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects. However, it is not known whether increasing GLP-1 effects can preserve or enhance functional beta-cell mass in humans. This proposal will determine the effect of increasing GLP-1 levels on functional beta-cell mass in human subjects with impaired fasting glucose (fasting glucose 110 - 126 mg/dl) or early T2D (fasting glucose 127 - 149 mg/dl) where a critical window exists for reversing further beta-cell deterioration. GLP-1 effects will be promoted by administration of either the GLP-1 analog, exenatide, or by increasing endogenous GLP-1 levels through administration of the oral dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor sitagliptin for a 6-month period. To control for the effect of exenatide and sitagliptin on normalization of blood glucose, subjects will be randomized to receive exenatide, sitagliptin or the sulfonylurea glimepiride, the latter being a first-line anti-diabetogenic agent that will serve as an active comparator.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Exenatide

Exenatide (Byetta®)-5 µg injected subcutaneously twice daily and increased after 1 month to 10 µg twice daily as tolerated by gastrointestinal effects

DRUG

Sitagliptin

Sitagliptin (Januvia®)100 mg by mouth every morning

DRUG

Glimepiride

Glimepiride (Amaryl®)-0.5 mg by mouth every morning and then increased by 0.5 - 1.0 mg at each monthly visit to achieve an average fasting glucose \< 110mg/dl

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Oct 20, 2008

  2. Study start

    Oct 2008

  3. Primary completion

    Nov 2012

  4. Study completion

    Nov 2012

  5. Results posted

    Dec 6, 2017

  6. Registry updated

    Jun 7, 2022

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)

Time frame · Baseline and 6 months

The acute insulin response to arginine (AIRarg) performed during the 340mg/dl glucose clamp allows for estimation of the the beta-cell secretory capacity (AIRmax) or functional beta-cell mass. Changes from baseline to 6 months of AIRmax were compared across groups

Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)

Time frame · Baseline and 6 months

AGRmin is performed during the 340mg/dl glucose clamp allows for estimation of the minimum alpha-cell glucagon secretion. Changes from baseline to 6 months of AGRmin were compared across groups.

Secondary outcomes

Change in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)

Time frame · Baseline and 6 months

The changes in B-cell insulin secretion, Acute Insulin Response to arginine (AIRarg) after 6 months were compared to baseline AIRarg for each group. Listed below are AIRarg at baseline and 6 months for each group.

Insulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 Months

Time frame · Baseline and 6 months

Insulin sensitivity (M/I) was determined by dividing the mean glucose infusion rate required during the 230 mg/dL glucose clamp (M) by the mean prestimulus insulin level (I) between 40 and 45 min of the glucose infusion The mean difference after 6 months in insulin sensitivity (M/I) were compared

PG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 Months

Time frame · Baseline and 6 months

Between ∼60 and 250 mg/dL, the magnitude of AIRarg is a linear function of the plasma glucose level, so the difference in AIRarg at fasting and 230 mg/dL glucose levels divided by the difference in plasma glucose (ΔAIRarg/ΔPG) gives the glucose-potentiation slope (GPS) (8,24-26). Using the y-intercept (b) from the line created by these two points, the plasma glucose level at which half-maximal insulin secretion is achieved (PG50) is derived from solving the equation 1/2 (AIRmax) = (GPS · PG50) + b, and provides a measure of β-cell sensitivity to glucose The mean difference after 6 months in PG 50 were compared. Listed below are the PG50 values at baseline and 6 months.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male and female patients age 18 to 70 years. 2. Ability to provide written informed consent 3. Mentally stable and able to comply with the procedures of the study protocol 4. Clinical history compatible with impaired fasting glucose or early T2D as defined by a plasma glucose concentration between 110-159 mg/dl following a 12 hour overnight fast performed off any anti-diabetogenic agent for at least 2 weeks (6 weeks for thiazolidinediones) 5. Stable body weight (+ 5%) for at least 2 weeks 6. Female Patients: Agree to use adequate contraception if reproductively capable. Adequate contraception includes either a hormonal or barrier method, or surgical sterilization. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes 2. Receiving insulin, exenatide (Byetta®), or sitagliptin (Januvia®) treatment or taking \> 2 oral anti-diabetogenic agents for the treatment of diabetes 3. BMI \> 44 kg/m2 4. Allergy to any sulfa-containing compounds 5. Uncontrolled hypertension (Systolic Blood Pressure \>160 or Diastolic Blood Pressure \> 100 mmHg) 6. Uncontrolled hyperlipidemia (triglycerides \> 500 or LDL \> 160 mg/dl) 7. Elevation of liver function tests \> 2 times the upper limit of normal 8. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \< 55 ml/min/1.73m2 (46) 9. Hyperkalemia (serum potassium \> 5.5 mmol/L) 10. Moderate anemia (hemoglobin concentration \< 12 g/dl in men and \< 11 g/dl in women) 11. Female patients: pregnant or lactating 12. Hepatic cirrhosis 13. Known active alcohol or substance abuse 14. Active cardiovascular disease 15. Use of any investigational agent within 6 weeks of the baseline visit 16. Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, will interfere with the safe completion of the trial

Study locations

3 registered sites.

United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Clinical and Translational Research Center, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Rodebaugh Diabetes Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Pennsylvania Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 9727886King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998 Sep;21(9):1414-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1414.PMID 7589820U.K. prospective diabetes study 16. Overview of 6 years' therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes. 1995 Nov;44(11):1249-58.PMID 12502499Butler AE, Janson J, Bonner-Weir S, Ritzel R, Rizza RA, Butler PC. Beta-cell deficit and increased beta-cell apoptosis in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003 Jan;52(1):102-10. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.1.102.PMID 16505537Ritzel RA, Butler AE, Rizza RA, Veldhuis JD, Butler PC. Relationship between beta-cell mass and fasting blood glucose concentration in humans. Diabetes Care. 2006 Mar;29(3):717-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-1538. No abstract available.PMID 11549624Kahn SE. Clinical review 135: The importance of beta-cell failure in the development and progression of type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Sep;86(9):4047-58. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.9.7713. No abstract available.PMID 15249997Godsland IF, Jeffs JAR, Johnston DG. Loss of beta cell function as fasting glucose increases in the non-diabetic range. Diabetologia. 2004 Jul;47(7):1157-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1454-z. Epub 2004 Jul 13.PMID 6384269Ward WK, Bolgiano DC, McKnight B, Halter JB, Porte D Jr. Diminished B cell secretory capacity in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1984 Oct;74(4):1318-28. doi: 10.1172/JCI111542.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Exenatide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.