Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT01642914·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Safety and Efficacy of Linaclotide in Patients With Chronic Constipation and Prominent Abdominal Bloating

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

487

Locations

151

Results

Posted

Publications

2

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linaclotide compared with placebo in patients with chronic constipation (CC) and prominent abdominal bloating. This study includes an up to 3-week screening period and a 2-3 week pretreatment period. Patients who are eligible will be randomized to one of two doses of linaclotide or placebo for 12 weeks. This 12-week study will assess the effects of linaclotide on bowel movement frequency, as well as other abdominal and bowel symptoms of CC.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Linaclotide 290 micrograms

oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast

DRUG

Linaclotide 145 micrograms

oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast

DRUG

Matching placebo

oral capsule, taken once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jul 17, 2012

  2. Study start

    Aug 2012

  3. Primary completion

    May 2013

  4. Study completion

    Aug 2013

  5. Results posted

    Apr 26, 2016

  6. Registry updated

    Apr 26, 2016

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder

Time frame · 12-week treatment period

A 9/12 Week CSBM 3+1 Responder is a patient who is a CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder is a patient who had a CSBM Weekly Frequency Rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline.

Secondary outcomes

9/12 Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder

Time frame · 12-week treatment period

A 9/12 Week CSBM 3+1 Responder is a patient who is a CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM 3+1 Weekly Responder is a patient who had a CSBM Weekly Frequency Rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline.

Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating

Time frame · Baseline and 12-week treatment period

Abdominal Bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The change from baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating score is the difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12 week Treatment Period.

Percent Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Bloating

Time frame · Baseline and 12-week treatment period

Abdominal Bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The percent change from baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating score is the percentage difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments score of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12 week Treatment Period.

Percent Change From Baseline in Abdominal Bloating at Week 12

Time frame · Baseline and Week 12

Abdominal bloating was measured daily using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a value of 0 represents no abdominal bloating and a value of 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating. The abdominal bloating score from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). The percent change from baseline at Week 12 in Abdominal Bloating score is the percentage difference between the average nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores during the 14 day Baseline period, and the average of the nonmissing daily patient assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during Week 12.

6/12 Week Abdominal Bloating 30% Responder

Time frame · 12-week treatment period

A patient was a 6/12 week abdominal bloating 30% responder if, for at least 6 weeks of the 12-week treatment period, that patient's improvement from baseline in the weekly abdominal bloating score was ≥ 30% from baseline.

Change From Baseline in 12-week CSBM Frequency Rate

Time frame · Baseline and 12-week treatment period

A patient's 12-week CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's 12-week CSBM frequency rate was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over the 12 weeks of the treatment period. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 1.

Time frame · Baseline and Week 1

A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 1 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 4.

Time frame · Baseline and Week 4

A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 4 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 8

Time frame · Baseline and Week 8

A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 8 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Change From Baseline in CSBM Frequency Rate at Week 12

Time frame · Baseline and Week 12

A patient's CSBM frequency rate from Baseline is derived from the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) daily diary data collected in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization, up to the time of randomization (Visit 3, Day 1). A patient's CSBM frequency rate at week 12 was the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week. Only the Placebo versus Linaclotide 145 micrograms arm comparison is a secondary measure type for this outcome measure. The additional data for the Linaclotide 290 micrograms arm (a pre-specified additional outcome measure) is presented here for ease of comparison.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria: * Patient has completed a colonoscopy according to the American Gastroenterological Association criteria with no clinically significant findings * Patient has successfully completed protocol procedures (with no clinically significant findings) * Patient meets protocol criteria for Chronic Constipation(CC): \< 3 bowel movements per week and reports one or more of the following symptoms for at least 12 weeks: 1. Straining during more than 25% of BMs 2. Lumpy or hard stools during more than 25% of BMs 3. Sensation of incomplete evacuation during more than 25% of BMs * Patient demonstrates continued chronic constipation and bloating through Pretreatment Period * Patient is compliant with Interactive voice response System (IVRS) Exclusion Criteria: * Patient has a history of loose or watery stools * Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) * Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility * Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that would limit the patient's ability to complete or participate in this clinical trial or could confound the study assessments

Study locations

151 registered sites.

Canada · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Forest Investigative Site 020

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 102

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 149

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 126

Goodyear, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 018

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 061

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 022

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 079

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 071

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Forest Investigative Site 135

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Forest Investigative Site 106

Anaheim, California, United States

Forest Investigative Site 104

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Forest Investigative Site 066

Mission Hills, California, United States

Forest Investigative Site 095

San Carlos, California, United States

Forest Investigative Site 009

San Diego, California, United States

Forest Investigative Site 151

Santa Monica, California, United States

Forest Investigative Site 010

Westlake Village, California, United States

Forest Investigative Site 012

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Forest Investigative Site 041

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Forest Investigative Site 045

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Forest Investigative Site 060

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Forest Investigative Site 007

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Forest Investigative Site 153

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Forest Investigative Site 091

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Related trials

More studies on Linaclotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.