DRUG
12-Week Study of Plecanatide for CIC (The National CIC3 Study)
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,410
Locations
167
Results
Posted
Publications
4
Study summary
What the protocol is testing.
The purpose of this study is to confirm that the investigational medication, plecanatide, is safe and effective in treating chronic idiopathic constipation.
Full detailed description
This is a national, randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study in approximately 1350 adult male and female patients with CIC comparing 2 doses of plecanatide to placebo. The study will be conducted at approximately 180 clinical study sites in the United States. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3.0 and 6.0 mg of plecanatide administered once daily (QD) for 12 weeks in a population of patients with CIC. The study population will include only patients without other causes of constipation or other chronic conditions that could interfere with study assessments. Patients may not take laxatives (with the exception of the study-provided rescue medication, bisacodyl 5mg tablets), or a number of prohibited drugs that are known to cause constipation or diarrhea, during study participation. There are 6 scheduled study visits, including the screening and follow-up visits. The planned duration of participation in this study will be 112 days and up to 155 days, with washout and all visit windows considered.
Interventions
Treatment arms and agents.
DRUG
Placebo
Timeline
From registration to results.
First posted
Apr 24, 2014
Study start
Apr 2014
Primary completion
May 2015
Study completion
Jul 2015
Results posted
Mar 14, 2019
Registry updated
May 28, 2019
Outcomes
What the study measures.
Primary outcomes
Number of Durable Overall CSBM Responders, Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame · 12-Week Treatment Period
The primary efficacy endpoint was measured by the number of durable overall CSBM responders over the 12-week Treatment Period. A durable overall CSBM responder was defined as a weekly CSBM responder for at least 9 of the 12 treatment weeks, including at least 3 of the last 4 weeks. A CSBM weekly responder was defined as a patient who has ≥ 3 Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements (CSBMs) per week and an increase from baseline of ≥1 CSBM for that week. A CSBM was a bowel movement that occurred in the absence of laxative use within 24 hours and was associated with the feeling of complete evacuation.
Secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in CSBMs (CSBMs/Week) Over the 12-week Treatment Period , Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame · Baseline and 12 weeks
The change from baseline in the number of Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements (CSBMs) over the 12-week Treatment Period was analyzed. Baseline was the mean number of CSBMs recorded during the 2-week baseline diary assessment period prior to the first dose of study drug. A CSBM was a bowel movement that occurred in the absence of laxative use within 24 hours and was associated with the feeling of complete evacuation.
Change From Baseline in SBMs (SBMs/Week) Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame · Baseline and 12 weeks
The change from baseline in the number of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) over the 12-week Treatment Period was analyzed. Baseline was the mean number of SBMs recorded during the 2-week baseline diary assessment period prior to the first dose of study drug. The weekly SBM totals were derived from the daily diary entries reported during the Treatment Period.
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly SBM Stool Consistency Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame · Baseline and 12 weeks
The change from baseline in the stool consistency score (i.e. BSFS) over the 12-week Treatment Period was analyzed. Baseline was the mean BSFS score recorded during the 2-week baseline diary assessment period prior to the first dose of study drug. The weekly mean BSFS score per patient was derived from the BSFS entries reported during the Treatment Period in the Daily Symptom Diary. The stool consistency of each bowel movement (BM) was assessed by patients using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale \[BSFS\] from 1 to 7. 1. = separate hard lumps like nuts (difficult to pass) 2. = sausage shaped but lumpy 3. = like a sausage but with cracks on its surface 4. = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft 5. = soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily) 6. = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool 7. = watery, no solid pieces (entirely liquid)
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Straining Score Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame · Baseline and 12 weeks
The change from baseline in the straining score over the 12-week Treatment Period was analyzed. Baseline was the mean of non-missing straining scores recorded during the 2-week baseline diary assessment period prior to the first dose of study drug. The weekly average straining score was derived from the straining scores reported during the Treatment Period in the Daily Symptom Diary. The severity of straining during bowel movements was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = very severe.
Eligibility
Who can take part.
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female aged 18-80, inclusive * Meets modified Rome III criteria for functional chronic idiopathic constipation for at least 3 months with symptom onset for at least 6 months * Completed a colonoscopy in accordance with American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) colon cancer screening guidelines (5 years), with no clinically significant findings * Willing to maintain a stable diet during the study Exclusion Criteria: * Loose stool (mushy) or watery (Bristol score 6 or 7) stool in the absence of any laxative or prohibited medicine for \> 25% of Bowel Movements (BMs) during the 3 months prior to screening visit OR during the 14 day pre-treatment assessment * Active peptic ulcer disease, diabetes or hypertension not adequately treated or not stable * History of cathartic colon, laxative, enema abuse, or ischemic colitis * Fecal impaction within 3 months of screening * Patient has had /has any: diseases or conditions associated with constipation (GI or CNS), structural abnormality of the GI tract or gastric bypass surgery, pelvic floor dysfunction, pseudo-obstruction, active infectious gastritis, diverticulitis, anal fissures or any disease or condition that can affect GI motility or defecation or can be associated with abdominal pain * Unexplained and clinically significant "alarm symptoms" including lower GI bleeding, iron-deficiency anemia, weight loss or systemic signs of infection or colitis * Major surgery, stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) within 60 days of screening * Participated in a previous plecanatide clinical trial
Study locations
167 registered sites.
United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.
Synergy Research Site
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Synergy Research Site
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Synergy Research Site
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Synergy Research Site
Goodyear, Arizona, United States
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Synergy Research Site
Anaheim, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Artesia, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Carmichael, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Corona, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Encino, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Garden Grove, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Garden Grove, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Glendale, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
La Mirada, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Laguna Hills, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Newport Beach, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Oceanside, California, United States
Synergy Research Site
Orange, California, United States
Publications
Results and literature.
Related trials
More studies on Plecanatide.
This is a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Weight-based Treatment Groups of Plecanatide Versus Placebo in Children and Adolescent Participants 6 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With FC
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. · Functional Constipation (FC)
Phase 2
Active, not recruiting
180
2026-07
GCC Agonist Signal in the Small Intestine
University of Wisconsin, Madison · Barrett Esophagus · Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Phase 1
Completed
43
2026-04
Efficacy and Safety of Plecanatide in Children 6 to <18 Years With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. · Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation
Phase 2
Completed
218
2025-12
Efficacy and Safety of Plecanatide Comparing With Placebo in the Treatment of Functional Constipation
Shandong Luoxin Pharmaceutical Group Stock Co., Ltd. · Functional Constipation
Phase 3
Completed
648
2024-07
Long Term Safety Study of Plecanatide
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. · Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Phase 3
Completed
2,272
2020-08
SP-304 Dose Ranging Study in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. · Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
Phase 2
Completed
84
2020-01
12-Week Study of Plecanatide for CIC (The CIC3 Study)
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. · Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
Phase 3
Completed
1,394
2019-12
A Postmarketing Study of Plecanatide in Breast Milk of Lactating Women Treated With TRULANCE®
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. · Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
Not applicable
Completed
7
2019-11
Related PeptideStat pages
Put the record in context.
Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.