Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT02268669·Phase 4·INTERVENTIONAL

Comparison of Primary PCI vs. Post-thrombolysis PCI as Reperfusion Strategies in STEMI

Status

Unknown

Phase

Phase 4

Enrollment

1,444

Locations

0

Results

Not posted

Publications

3

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The conceptual hypothesis of this study is that primary angioplasty is superior to a combined strategy of immediate thrombolysis followed by routine angioplasty in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), even with the inherent delay of the transfer of these patients.

Full detailed description

This is a randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial comparing two strategies of reperfusion in STEMI. Patients will be randomly allocated to: primary angioplasty or post-thrombolysis angioplasty. A clinical follow-up will be performed at 12 months. In this trial, 1444 patients with STEMI will be randomized to primary angioplasty with immediate stent implantation in at least the infarct related artery (IRA) under bivalirudin protection, or to a combined strategy of immediate thrombolysis with tenecteplase (TNK) and enoxaparin followed by cardiac catheterization and adequate revascularization when indicated during the next morning after randomization. Primary endpoint: To compare the clinical efficacy (incidence of the composite endpoint formed by death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization or severe hemorrhage within 12 months) of primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic treatment followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) the next day in patients with STEMI. Secondary endpoints: * Components of the composite endpoint individually analysed at 12 months (death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and severe hemorrhage). * Cardiovascular mortality and its different components (pre-specified in the case report forms, CRF) at 12 months. * Incidence of the composite endpoint formed by death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and/or hemorrhage at 30 days. * Incidence of major bleeding events during hospitalization and at 30 days. * To compare the clinical efficacy of both treatments according to the timing of presentation after symptom onset (0 to 3 hours, \>3-6 hours, and \>6-12 hours), to the patient´s age (\> or \< 75 years), to the infarction localization (anterior or inferior), to gender (male or female), to the presence of diabetes mellitus and to the characteristics of the recruiting center (with or without 24-hour catheterization facilities). * Incidence of the composite endpoint formed by death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and/or hemorrhage at 3 years. * Components of the composite endpoint individually analysed at 3 years (death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and severe hemorrhage). * Analysis of stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition (http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/transcripts/2006-4253t2.rtf.) within 30 days, 12 months and 3 years. * To compare the combination of death, reinfarction, revascularization, rehospitalization and/or major hemorrhage of patients treated with primary angioplasty versus those assigned to the postrombolysis angioplasty who underwent catheterization the following day within 30 days, 12 months and 3 years. * To compare every indivicual components of the combine endpoint (death, reinfarction, revascularization, rehospitalization and major hemorrhage) of patients treated with primary angioplasty versus those assigned to the postrombolysis angioplasty who underwent catheterization the following day within 30 days, 12 months and 3 years. * To compare the cost-effectiveness relationship (cost of maintaining a patient alive and without adverse cardiovascular events within the first year post-infarction) of both strategies.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

OTHER

Reperfusion strategies

Two different reperfusion strategies in STEMI will be compared: primary angioplasty vs. post-thrombolysis angioplasty

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Oct 20, 2014

  2. Study start

    May 2010

  3. Primary completion

    Oct 2014

  4. Study completion

    Mar 2016

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Oct 20, 2014

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

incidence of the composite endpoint formed by death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization or severe hemorrhage

Time frame · 12 months

To compare the clinical efficacy (incidence of the composite endpoint formed by death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization or severe hemorrhage within 12 months) of primary angioplasty versus post-thrombolytic angioplasty

Secondary outcomes

Incidence of death

Time frame · 12 months

Components of the composite endpoint individually analysed at 12 months (death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and severe hemorrhage).

Incidence of myocardial reinfaction

Time frame · 12 months

Components of the composite endpoint individually analysed at 12 months (death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and severe hemorrhage).

Incidence of new revascularization

Time frame · 12 months

Components of the composite endpoint individually analysed at 12 months (death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and severe hemorrhage).

Incidence of rehospitalization

Time frame · 12 months

Components of the composite endpoint individually analysed at 12 months (death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and severe hemorrhage).

Incidence of cardiovascular mortality

Time frame · 12 months

Incidence of the composite endpoint formed by death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and/or hemorrhage

Time frame · 30 days

Incidence of major bleeding events

Time frame · Hospitalization and at 30 days

clinical efficacy according to timing of presentation (<3, 3-6, and >6 hours), patient´s age (> or < 75 years), infarction localization, gender, presence of diabetes and recruiting center (with or without catheterization facilities)

Time frame · 12 months

Incidence of the composite endpoint formed by death, reinfarction, new revascularization, rehospitalization and/or hemorrhage

Time frame · 3 years

Incidence of death

Time frame · 3 years

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Age \>18 years * Chest discomfort \> 30 minutes with no response to nitroglycerin * Time from the onset of symptoms to randomization between 0 and 12 hours * ST segment elevation \> 1 mm in two or more contiguos precordial leads or non-diagnostic ECG (left bundle branch block or pacemarker rhythm) with classic symptoms. * Killip class equal or less than 3 * Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Cardiogenic shock defined as a systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg without response to fluid administration or \<100 mm Hg in patients with supportive treatment and no bradycardia * Suspicion or evidence of mechanical complications of STEMI * Non-cardiac disease that is likely to jeopardize compliance with follow-up schedule of the study (life expectancy \< 1 year) * woman of childbearing potential unless a negative pregnant test * Major contraindications for thrombolytic therapy * Participation in other trial * Known multivessel disease identified as unsuitable for revascularization * Known peripheral vascular disease that complicates cardiac catheterization

Study locations

0 registered sites.

No country data reported. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

No study locations reported.

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 15380963Fernandez-Aviles F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, Vazquez N, Blanco J, Alonso-Briales J, Lopez-Mesa J, Fernandez-Vazquez F, Calvo I, Martinez-Elbal L, San Roman JA, Ramos B; GRACIA (Grupo de Analisis de la Cardiopatia Isquemica Aguda) Group. Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004 Sep 18-24;364(9439):1045-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17059-1.PMID 17244641Fernandez-Aviles F, Alonso JJ, Pena G, Blanco J, Alonso-Briales J, Lopez-Mesa J, Fernandez-Vazquez F, Moreu J, Hernandez RA, Castro-Beiras A, Gabriel R, Gibson CM, Sanchez PL; GRACIA-2 (Groupo de Analisis de Cardiopatia Isquemica Aguda) Investigators. Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the GRACIA-2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2007 Apr;28(8):949-60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl461. Epub 2007 Jan 23.PMID 20716757Sanchez PL, Gimeno F, Ancillo P, Sanz JJ, Alonso-Briales JH, Bosa F, Santos I, Sanchis J, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Messa J, de Prado AP, Alonso JJ, San Roman JA, Fernandez-Aviles F. Role of the paclitaxel-eluting stent and tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing postfibrinolysis angioplasty: the GRACIA-3 randomized clinical trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(4):297-307. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.920868.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Bivalirudin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.