Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
PeptideStat
Menu

Vendors

Compare pricesVendor directoryVendor reviewsDiscount codesLab tests & COAs

Research

ResearchDatabaseClinical trials

Tools

All calculatorsReconstitutionAccumulationUnit converterPeptide chemistry
NCT02311673·Phase 2·INTERVENTIONAL

Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Setmelanotide (RM-493) in Obese Participants With Prader-Willi Syndrome

SetmelanotideWeight lossCompleted

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 2

Enrollment

40

Locations

5

Results

Posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a once daily subcutaneous injectable formulation of setmelanotide in obese participants with Prader-Willi syndrome on tolerability, weight loss, and hyperphagia-related behavior. The study drug (setmelanotide and placebo) was administered in a blinded fashion.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Setmelanotide

subcutaneous injection

DRUG

Placebo

Subcutaneous injection

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Dec 8, 2014

  2. Study start

    Mar 19, 2015

  3. Primary completion

    Oct 26, 2016

  4. Study completion

    Oct 26, 2016

  5. Results posted

    Jul 27, 2023

  6. Registry updated

    Jul 27, 2023

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) - Period 2

Time frame · Days 15 to 41

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect

Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 3

Time frame · Days 42 to 55

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect

Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 4

Time frame · Days 56 to 69

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect

Mean Body Weight - Period 2

Time frame · Baseline (Day 15)

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2

Time frame · Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

Time frame · Baseline (Day 15)

The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia).

Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

Time frame · Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.

Secondary outcomes

Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Drive Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

Time frame · Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic drive score assesses the persistence in asking for food based on 4 items. All 4 items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic drive range from a minimum score of 4 (no hyperphagic drive) to a maximum score of 20 (greater hyperphagic drive). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic drive score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.

Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Behaviors Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

Time frame · Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic behavior factor score assesses food seeking behaviors based on 4 items. All 4 items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic behaviors range from a minimum score of 4 (no hyperphagic behavior) to a maximum score of 20 (greater hyperphagic behavior). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic behaviors score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.

Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Severity Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

Time frame · Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic severity factor score assesses the severity of hyperphagia based on 2 items. Both items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic severity range from a minimum score of 2 (no hyperphagic severity) to a maximum score of 10 (greater hyperphagic severity). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic severity score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.

Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 3

Time frame · Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56

The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.

Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 4

Time frame · Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70

The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.

Mean Setmelanotide Trough Concentrations

Time frame · 5 minutes predose on Day 42 and Day 70

The average of setmelanotide trough concentrations values for both timepoints (5 minutes predose on Day 42 and Day 70) is presented.

Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval

Time frame · Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing

Maximum drug concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data.

Time to the Maximum Drug Concentration (Tmax) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval

Time frame · Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing

Maximum drug concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data.

Area Under the Drug Concentration-Time Curve From Time-Zero to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC24h) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval

Time frame · Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing

Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval

Time frame · Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing

Volume of distribution calculated as Dose/The observed terminal rate constant\*AUC24h.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
16 Years
Maximum age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: 1. PWS due to chromosome 15 micro-deletion, maternal uniparental disomy, or imprinting defect, confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray, and/or methylation studies. Obese male or female participants weighing at least 50 kilograms (kg) with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kilogram per square meter (kg/m²) 2. Age 16-65 years 3. If a participant has diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, following criteria must be met: 1. hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) \< 7.5% not being managed with insulin. Participants taking glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues (exenatide or liraglutide) must have been on stable dose for greater than 3 months. 2. Fasting plasma glucose \< 140 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) 3. No history of ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma 4. Vital signs must be within the following ranges and stable. 1. Systolic blood pressure, 90-150 millimeter of mercury (mm Hg) 2. Diastolic blood pressure, 50-90 mm Hg 3. Pulse rate, 40-100 beats per minute (bpm) 5. Stable body weight at home for approximately 2 months (self or guardian-reported loss/gain within ± 5%). 6. Blood pressure (≤ 150/90 mmHg); may include stable dose (≥ 30 days of use) of up to two anti-hypertensive medications that are intended to remain on a stable dose during the protocol 7. Parent or guardian is able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and be able to understand and sign the written informed consent. Due to the significant intellectual disability with PWS, assent is to be provided by the participant who cannot consent for himself or herself. 8. Results of screening clinical laboratory tests (complete blood count with differential and platelets and chemistry profile) must be within normal range or, if outside of the normal range, must be accepted by the investigator and sponsor as not clinically significant. 9. Females of non-childbearing potential, defined as surgically sterile (status post hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation) or post-menopausal for at least 12 months (and confirmed with a screening follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the post-menopausal lab range), do not require contraception during the study. All other females of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception as outlined in the protocol. 10. Males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to a double barrier method if they become sexually active during the study and for 90 days following the study. Male participants must not donate sperm for 90 days following their participation in the study. 11. Participants must be on a stable dose of any allowed chronic concomitant medications while participating in the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Recent use (within 3 month) of weight loss agents including herbal medication. 2. Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) disorders which the investigator believes will interfere significantly with study compliance. 3. A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥ 15. 4. Any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). 5. Clinically significant illness in the 8 weeks before screening. 6. History of clinically significant bleeding disorders. 7. Current, clinically significant liver, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, oncologic, or gastrointestinal disease. 8. Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or other active endocrine disorders (e.g., Cushing syndrome, or thyroid dysfunction except if on adequate thyroid or glucocorticoid replacement supplement). 9. Cardiovascular disease event including history of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, second degree or greater heart block or prolonged QT syndrome. 10. Blood pressure \> 150/90 mm Hg. 11. Liver disease or liver injury as indicated by abnormal liver function tests, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or serum bilirubin (\> 1.5 x upper limit of normal for any of these tests) or history of hepatic cirrhosis. 12. History or presence of impaired renal function as indicated by clinically significantly abnormal creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or urinary constituents (e.g., albuminuria) or moderate to severe renal dysfunction as defined by the Cockcroft-Gault equation (\< 50 mL/min). 13. History or close family history (parents or siblings) of melanoma. 14. Oculocutaneous albinism (occurs at approximately 1% in PWS). 15. Significant dermatologic findings as part of the Screening comprehensive skin evaluation performed by the dermatologist. 16. Significant history of abuse of drugs or solvents in the year before screening or a positive Drugs of Abuse (DOA) test at screening. 17. History of alcohol abuse in the past year before screening or currently drinks in excess of 21 units per week (3 servings or units/day). 18. Caffeine consumption exceeding 6 cups of caffeinated tea/coffee (or equivalent) per day. 19. Participant is, in the opinion of the Investigator, not suitable to participate in the study. 20. Participation in any clinical study with an investigational drug/device within 3 months prior to the first day of dosing. 21. Positive history for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C tests or tuberculosis. 22. Serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug. 23. Clinically significant blood loss or blood donation \> 500 milliliters (mL) within 3 months. 24. Inadequate venous access. 25. History of low blood counts or recurring infections.

Study locations

5 registered sites.

United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

University of California Irvine

Irvine, California, United States

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Kansas University Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Winthrop University Hospital

Mineola, New York, United States

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

ClinicalTrials.gov ↗Search PubMed ↗Search FDA ↗Search EMA ↗

Related trials

More studies on Setmelanotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.

TrialsSetmelanotide trial dashboard →