Caecal pH as a Biomarker for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is an extremely common condition. Between 1.9 and 3.6 million patients consult a healthcare professional for IBS each year in the UK (1). The total population prevalence is much higher as most IBS sufferers are non-consulters due to the perceived lack of effective treatments. IBS can be sub-classified based upon predominating bowel habit, i.e. constipation predominant (IBS-C), alternating bowel habit (IBS-A) or diarrhoea predominant (2). In recent years, several efficacious treatment approaches have been applied to IBS including dietary interventions (low fibre and low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccha¬rides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP)), probiotics (VSL#3) and pharmacological agents (linaclotide) (3). Whilst each of these treatment approaches have shown efficacy, it is clear that further refinement of the IBS diagnostic algorithm is required to better target therapies in order to overcome the inherent heterogeneity within the IBS population. Bloating and distension are both common and vexatious symptoms in a proportion of IBS patients. Bloating is largely regarded as a subjective sensation of abdominal swelling, whereas distension refers to an observable increase in abdominal girth. Bloating is associated with a reduction in quality of life, is a cause for healthcare seeking and represents a considerable challenge to manage effectively. The anaerobic breakdown of carbohydrates and protein by bacteria, largely occurring within the proximal colon, is through a process known as fermentation, the principal products of which are short chain fatty acids (SCFA). One of the proposed mechanisms of bloating and distension is colonic dysbiosis and subsequent mal-fermentation. This has been supported by data which show that a large proportion of IBS patients improve symptomatically when restricting their diet to an 'elemental' formula for 2-4 weeks thus reducing the amount of fermentable material in the intestinal lumen. The direct in vivo measurement of SCFA concentrations in the human proximal colon is technically difficult and invasive. Given that the degree of bacterial fermentation is directly proportional to the concentration of SCFA, the measurement of segmental intra-colonic pH is an inverse surrogate proxy of the degree of fermentation occurring within that territory. We have recently shown that measurement of caecal pH using the wireless motility capsule (WMC) in IBS and control patients is both technical feasible and able to differentiate between the two populations (4). Our study showed that caecal pH is significantly lower in IBS when compared to controls thus supporting the concept that mal-fermentation is contributing to IBS symptomatology. Importantly, we have also shown that caecal pH is correlated with inhibition of caecal contractility which has led us to propose the idea that 'caecoparesis' maybe the long sought after alteration in motor function which differentiates IBS patients from healthy participants and explains why IBS preferentially experience pain in the right colon and upper abdomen in response to balloon distension. TRIAL OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this study is to demonstrate that caecal pH is a sensitive and reliable biomarker of caecal fermentation in IBS and that normalisation of the caecal pH environment will correlate with symptomatic improvement in IBS patients. We hypothesise that normalisation of the caecal pH environment with either dietary intervention or linaclotide will correlate with symptomatic improvement in IBS patients. To achieve this we will recruit a cohort of Rome III defined IBS patients and sub-divide them into the appropriate IBS type based on symptoms. We will then characterise their phenotype in terms of gastro-intestinal physiology (WMC + lactulose hydrogen breath test) and psychological profile. They will then be allocated to one of (2 or 3) treatment arms (control diet, low FODMAP diet, control diet + linaclotide). Each treatment arm will last for 28 days after which WMC will be repeated and symptoms assessed. Secondary aims will include characterising motility and transit in IBS-sub groups, determining the effect of the interventions of motility and transit, comparison of ileal and caecal pH profiles with hydrogen / methane breath testing data and comparison of symptom change and physiological assessment outcomes.