DRUG
Linaclotide
Oral, once daily
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
759
Locations
71
Results
Posted
Publications
1
Study summary
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and dose response of two delayed release formulations of linaclotide (DR; DR formulation 1 is DR1; DR formulation 2 is DR2) administered orally to patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). Additional objectives include understanding how the two DR formulations compare with each other and with the FDA-approved 290 μg LINZESS® (the immediate release \[IR\] formulation of linaclotide).
Interventions
DRUG
Oral, once daily
DRUG
Oral, once daily
Timeline
First posted
Sep 24, 2015
Study start
Oct 22, 2015
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2016
Study completion
Sep 30, 2016
Results posted
Apr 24, 2020
Registry updated
Apr 24, 2020
Outcomes
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo
Time frame · Baseline, up to Week 12
Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo
Time frame · Baseline, up to Week 12
Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.
Change From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo
Time frame · Baseline, up to Week 12
A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.
Change From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo
Time frame · Baseline, up to Week 12
A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.
Number of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo
Time frame · up to Week 12
A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.
Number of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo
Time frame · up to Week 12
A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.
Not reported in the indexed record.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria: * Patient has completed a colonoscopy according to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) criteria, with no clinically significant findings * Patient has no clinically significant findings on a physical examination and clinical laboratory tests * Patient meets protocol criteria for diagnosis of IBS-C * Patient demonstrates continued IBS-C through Pretreatment Period * Patient maintains a minimum level of compliance with daily diary Exclusion Criteria: * Patient has history of loose or watery stools * Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with a medical condition that may contribute to abdominal pain * Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility * Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments
Study locations
United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.
Ironwood Investigational Site
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Anaheim, California, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chula Vista, California, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Garden Grove, California, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
La Mesa, California, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Newport Beach, California, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Orange, California, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Diego, California, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bristol, Connecticut, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Kissimmee, Florida, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
South Miami, Florida, United States
Ironwood Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
Related trials
Mayo Clinic · Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation
Not applicable
Recruiting
65
2026-07
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University · Colorectal Adenoma · Stage 0 Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8
Phase 2
Active, not recruiting
150
2026-07
AbbVie · Functional Constipation (FC) · Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)
Phase 3
Completed
123
2026-05
University of Nottingham · Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
Early Phase 1
Recruiting
26
2026-05
University of Wisconsin, Madison · Barrett Esophagus · Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Phase 1
Completed
43
2026-04
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso · Chronic Constipation · Diabete Mellitus
Phase 4
Active, not recruiting
23
2026-04
Md Mehedi Shahriar · Chronic Idiopathic Constipation · Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-C)
Phase 4
Not yet recruiting
90
2026-02
University of Florida · Patients Scheduled for Colonoscopy
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Recruiting
10
2026-01
Related PeptideStat pages
Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.