Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT02590432·Phase 4·INTERVENTIONAL

An Open-Label, Long-term Study to Assess the Immunogenicity of LINZESS® (Linaclotide) Administered Orally to Adult Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation or Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 4

Enrollment

828

Locations

79

Results

Posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the potential of LINZESS® (linaclotide) treatment to induce the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). The secondary objectives are to provide additional evidence supporting the long-term safety and efficacy of linaclotide in adult irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) participants and to evaluate lower doses of linaclotide.

Full detailed description

This study includes up to a 3-week Screening Period, followed by a 52-week treatment period. Participants with CIC meeting the entry criteria received linaclotide 145 μg capsules, orally, once daily and participants with IBS-C meeting the entry criteria received linaclotide 290 μg capsules, orally, once daily. Participants with intolerable Adverse Events (AEs), following resolution of the AEs, could be randomized to receive 290 μg, 145 μg, or the lower dose of 72 μg linaclotide oral capsules for IBS-C; and 145 μg or 72 μg for CIC. Participants who experienced further intolerable AEs after the randomization could be transitioned to open-label 72 μg linaclotide.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Linaclotide

Linaclotide capsules, orally, once daily.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Oct 29, 2015

  2. Study start

    Nov 1, 2015

  3. Primary completion

    Feb 5, 2018

  4. Study completion

    Feb 5, 2018

  5. Results posted

    Aug 22, 2019

  6. Registry updated

    Aug 22, 2019

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-Related Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) in Serum

Time frame · Baseline (Day 1) up to 52 weeks or 8 months post last dose if ADA positive at Week 52 (approximately 84 weeks)

Participants who met either of the following criteria: 1) treatment-induced ADA-positive (≥ 1 postbaseline ADA-positive sample) for baseline ADA negative or ADA-undetermined participants or 2) treatment-boosted ADA-positive (≥ 1 postbaseline ADA-positive sample with titer values ≥ 4-fold the baseline titer value) for baseline ADA-positive participants were reported as a ADA positive responder.

Secondary outcomes

Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Constipation Severity

Time frame · Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 12, 26, 40 and 52 (Open Label Treatment Period)

Participants rated constipation severity during the previous 7 days on a 5-point ordinal scale where, 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe and 5=Very Severe. Higher scores indicate greater severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Symptom Severity for Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

Time frame · Baseline (Day 1) to Week 2, 4, 12, 26, 40 and 52 (Open Label Treatment Period)

Participants rated IBS symptoms severity during the previous 7 days on a 5-point ordinal scale where, 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe and 5=Very severe. Higher scores indicate greater severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Change From Baseline in Degree of Relief of IBS Symptoms for Participants With IBS-C

Time frame · Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 2, 4, 12, 26, 40 and 52 (Open Label Treatment Period)

Participants rated degree of relief of IBS symptoms during previous 7 days on a 7-point balanced ordinal scale where, 1=completely relieved, 2=considerably relieved, 3=somewhat relieved, 4=unchanged, 5=somewhat worse, 6=considerably worse and 7=as bad as I can imagine. Lower scores indicate greater relief. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

IBS Treatment Satisfaction Assessment Postbaseline for Participants With IBS-C

Time frame · Weeks 2, 4, 12, 26, 40 and 52 (Open Label Treatment Period)

Participants rated degree of satisfaction with the LINZESS®'s ability to relieve IBS symptoms on a 5-point ordinal scale where, 1=Not at all satisfied, 2=A little satisfied, 3=Moderately satisfied, 4=Quite satisfied and 5=Very satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Constipation Treatment Satisfaction Assessment Postbaseline for Participants With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)

Time frame · Weeks 2, 4, 12, 26, 40 and 52 (Open Label Treatment Period)

Participants rated degree of satisfaction with LINZESS®'s ability to relieve constipation symptoms on a 5-point ordinal scale where 1=Not at all satisfied, 2=A little satisfied, 3=Moderately satisfied, 4=Quite satisfied and 5=Very satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Number of Participants With Recurrence of Diarrhea

Time frame · From first dose in the Double-blind Treatment Period to Week 52

Participant reporting any instance of diarrhea during the Double-blind Treatment Period.

Number of Participants With Recurrence of Intolerable Diarrhea

Time frame · From first dose in the Double-blind Treatment Period to Week 52

Participants reporting any instance of intolerable diarrhea during the Double-blind Treatment Period (Non-responder otherwise). Only includes participants reporting intolerable diarrhea during the Open-label Treatment Period.

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Time frame · From first dose of study treatment up to Week 52

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is an AE that occurred after receiving the first dose of investigational product or an AE present prior to first dose but increased in severity during the Treatment Period.

Time to First Recurrence of Diarrhea

Time frame · From first dose in the Double-blind Treatment Period to Week 52

Time to first recurrence of diarrhea was defined as event/censored date - double-blind start date + 1, where event date (responders) = first recurrence of diarrhea date during the double-blind treatment period; censoring date (non-responders) = double-blind end date. Only includes participants reporting intolerable diarrhea during the open-label treatment period.

Time to First Recurrence of Intolerable Diarrhea

Time frame · From first dose in the Double-blind Treatment Period to Week 52

Time to first recurrence of intolerable diarrhea was defined as event/censored date - double-blind start date + 1, where event date (responders) = first recurrence of intolerable diarrhea date during the double-blind treatment period; censoring date (non-responders) = double-blind end date. Only includes participants reporting intolerable diarrhea during the open-label treatment period.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Participants meet the Rome III criteria for IBS-C or CIC: * IBS-C Criteria: the participant must meet the following 2 criteria (A and B). A. IBS Criteria: The participant must have abdominal pain or discomfort at least 3 days per month in the 3 months before diagnosis (with symptom onset at least 6 months before diagnosis) associated with 2 or more of the following: 1. Improvement with defecation. 2. Onset associated with a change in frequency of stool. 3. Onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool. B. Stool Consistency Requirement: During the 3 months before diagnosis in the absence of laxative or enema use, the patient has hard or lumpy stools (Bristol Stool Form Scale \[BSFS\] score 1 or 2) with at least 25% of bowel movements (BMs) and has loose or mushy stools (BSFS 5 or 6) with \<25% of BMs. * CIC Criteria: the participant must meet the following 3 criteria (A, B, and C): A. Participant meets 2 or more of the following criteria for 3 months before the diagnosis with symptom onset at least 6 months before diagnosis: 1. Straining during at least 25% of defecations. 2. Lumpy or hard stools in at least 25% of defecations. 3. Sensation of incomplete evacuation for at least 25% of defecations. 4. Sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage for at least 25% of defecations. 5. Manual maneuvers to facilitate at least 25% of defecations (e.g., digital evacuation, support of the pelvic floor). 6. Fewer than 3 defecations per week. B. Loose stools are rarely present without the use of laxatives. C. Insufficient criteria for irritable bowel syndrome. (The criteria for IBS are provided in Point A under IBS Criteria, above). * Participant meets the colonoscopy requirements, which are modified from the Summary of the US-Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and other Colonoscopy Requirements. * Participant has successfully completed protocol procedures (with no clinically significant findings). Exclusion Criteria: * At Day 1 visit, the participant reports having 6 or more spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) in the week prior to screening. * At Day 1 visit, the participant reports having any SBMs that were watery (BSFS=7) or more than 1 SBM that was mushy (BSFS=6) in the week prior to screening. * Participant has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility. * Participant has any protocol excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that would limit the patient's ability to complete or participate in this clinical trial or could confound the study assessments. * Participant has ever received linaclotide as a treatment (including commercially-available product) or has been randomized into any clinical study in which linaclotide was a treatment. (participant who enrolled into linaclotide clinical studies conducted prior or during this study but failed to be randomized are eligible for the current study). * Participant has ever received plecanatide, SP-333, or has participated in a plecanatide clinical study.

Study locations

79 registered sites.

United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Pinnacle Research Group, LLC

Anniston, Alabama, United States

North Alabama Research Center, LLC

Athens, Alabama, United States

Alliance Clinical Research

Childersburg, Alabama, United States

G & L Research, LLC

Foley, Alabama, United States

Radiant Research, Inc.

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Radiant Research, Inc.

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Clinical Research Institute of Arizona, LLC

Surprise, Arizona, United States

Clinical Research Consortium

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Desert Sun Clinical Research, LLC.

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Preferred Research Partners, Inc.

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Applied Research Center of Arkansas

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Kindred Medical Institute for Clinical Trials, LLC

Corona, California, United States

Global Clinical Trials LLC

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Diagnamics Inc

Encinitas, California, United States

MD Studies, Inc.

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Research Center of Fresno, Inc.

Fresno, California, United States

VVCRD Clinical Research

Garden Grove, California, United States

Facey Medical Foundation

Mission Hills, California, United States

Clinical Trials Research

Sacramento, California, United States

Northern California Research

Sacramento, California, United States

Artemis Institute for Clinical Research

San Diego, California, United States

Precision Research Institute

San Diego, California, United States

Empire Clinical Research

Upland, California, United States

Lynn Institute of Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Linaclotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.