Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT02837783·Phase 4·INTERVENTIONAL

A Study of the Effect of Linaclotide on Abdominal Girth in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

Status

Terminated

Phase

Phase 4

Enrollment

20

Locations

1

Results

Posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The objective of this trial is to determine the effect of linaclotide on abdominal girth in IBS-C participants with the baseline symptoms of abdominal bloating and an increased abdominal girth.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Linaclotide

Oral, once daily

DRUG

Placebo

Oral, one daily

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jul 20, 2016

  2. Study start

    Dec 21, 2016

  3. Primary completion

    Oct 31, 2018

  4. Study completion

    Oct 31, 2018

  5. Results posted

    Dec 6, 2021

  6. Registry updated

    Dec 6, 2021

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth at Week 4

Time frame · Baseline, Week 4

Mean change in abdominal girth (physical measure of bloating/distension) as measured by area under the curve (AUC), determined by 24-hour abdominal inductance plesthymography (AIP; with hourly averages). The AUC was calculated using the Trapezoidal method from the first reliable hour of measurement to last measurement (bedtime). The AUC for each participant was then individually standardized by dividing the total AUC over the period by that patient's number of hours of measurement included in the AUC. (Therefore, the time element was removed from the standardized AUC, and the unit of measure for this outcome is centimeters \[cm\]).

Secondary outcomes

Change From Baseline in Abdominal Girth at Week 2

Time frame · Baseline, Week 2

Mean change in abdominal girth (physical measure of bloating/distention) as measured by AUC, determined by 24-hour AIP (with hourly averages). The AUC was calculated using the Trapezoidal method from the first reliable hour of measurement to last measurement (bedtime). The AUC for each participant was then individually standardized by dividing the total AUC over the period by that patient's number of hours of measurement included in the AUC. (Therefore, the time element was removed from the standardized AUC, and the unit of measure for this outcome is centimeters \[cm\]).

Percent Change From Baseline in Maximal Abdominal Girth at Week 4

Time frame · Baseline, Week 4

The maximum change in girth from the first hour, over the period from the 2nd hour to bedtime. The percentage change in maximum distension from baseline to 4 weeks will also be calculated.

Change From Baseline of Symptom Severity (Abdominal Pain, Discomfort, Bloating, and Distension) at Week 1

Time frame · Baseline, Week 1

Symptom severity was assessed daily on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no symptoms and 10 represents very severe symptoms. Participants rated their abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, and distension at its worst over the last 24 hours. Weekly average scores were calculated individually for abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, distension. The abdominal score was calculated as the weekly average from the daily scores of the individual items of pain, discomfort, bloating combined. The abdominal score plus distension was calculated as the weekly average from the daily scores of the individual items of pain, discomfort, bloating and distension combined.

Change From Baseline of Symptom Severity (Abdominal Pain, Discomfort, Bloating, and Distension) at Week 2

Time frame · Baseline, Week 2

Symptom severity was assessed daily on an 11-point NRS from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no symptoms and 10 represents very severe symptoms. Participants rated their abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, and distension at its worst over the last 24 hours. Weekly average scores were calculated individually for abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, distension. The abdominal score was calculated as the weekly average from the daily scores of the individual items of pain, discomfort, bloating combined. The abdominal score plus distension was calculated as the weekly average from the daily scores of the individual items of pain, discomfort, bloating and distension combined.

Change From Baseline of Symptom Severity (Abdominal Pain, Discomfort, Bloating, and Distension) at Week 3

Time frame · Baseline, Week 3

Symptom severity was assessed daily on an 11-point NRS from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no symptoms and 10 represents very severe symptoms. Participants rated their abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, and distension at its worst over the last 24 hours. Weekly average scores were calculated individually for abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, distension. The abdominal score was calculated as the weekly average from the daily scores of the individual items of pain, discomfort, bloating combined. The abdominal score plus distension was calculated as the weekly average from the daily scores of the individual items of pain, discomfort, bloating and distension combined.

Change From Baseline of Symptom Severity (Abdominal Pain, Discomfort, Bloating, and Distension) at Week 4

Time frame · Baseline, Week 4

Symptom severity was assessed daily on an 11-point NRS from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no symptoms and 10 represents very severe symptoms. Participants rated their abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, and distension at its worst over the last 24 hours. Weekly average scores were calculated individually for abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, distension. The abdominal score was calculated as the weekly average from the daily scores of the individual items of pain, discomfort, bloating combined. The abdominal score plus distension was calculated as the weekly average from the daily scores of the individual items of pain, discomfort, bloating and distension combined.

Change From Baseline in Digestive Sensations (Subjective Bloating, Abdominal Discomfort, Abdominal Distension and Abdominal Pain) at Week 2

Time frame · Baseline, Week 2

A digestive sensations questionnaire was used to record abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, and distension symptoms on an hourly basis (waking hours only) during the 24 hours the participants are fitted with the AIP belt, using an 11-point NRS, with 0=no symptomatic sensations and 10=most severe symptomatic sensations. Daily diary scores for each of the digestive symptoms was averaged to obtain 'weekly' scores.

Change From Baseline in Digestive Sensations (Subjective Bloating, Abdominal Discomfort, Abdominal Distension and Abdominal Pain) at Week 4

Time frame · Baseline, Week 4

A digestive sensations questionnaire was used to record abdominal pain, discomfort, bloating, and distension on an hourly basis (waking hours only) during the 24 hours the participants are fitted with the AIP belt, using an 11-point NRS, with 0=no symptomatic sensations and 10=most severe symptomatic sensations. Daily diary scores for each of the digestive symptoms was averaged to obtain 'weekly' scores.

Change From Baseline in Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) Over Time

Time frame · Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4

Daily stool consistency analyses were performed using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), whereby a score of 1 = separate hard lumps like nuts (difficult to pass); 2 = sausage shaped but lumpy; 3 = like a sausage but with cracks on surface; 4 = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5 = soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily); 6 = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; and 7 = watery, no solid pieces (entirely liquid). Daily average recorded BSFS scores for each participant were computed for each week.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: • Patient meets protocol criteria for diagnosis of IBS-C, abdominal pain, abdominal bloating and abdominal girth Exclusion Criteria: * Patient has history of loose or watery stools * Patient has both clinically significant findings and unexplained clinically significant alarm symptoms * Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with a medical condition that may contribute to abdominal pain * Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments

Study locations

1 registered sites.

United Kingdom. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Peter Whorwell

Wythenshawe, Manchester, United Kingdom

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Linaclotide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.