Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT03336814·Phase 4·INTERVENTIONAL

Evaluation of Early Association of Terlipressin and Norepinephrine During Septic Shock; the TerliNor Study

Status

Unknown

Phase

Phase 4

Enrollment

40

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

In guidelines norepinephrine is the first line vasopressor recommended in case of septic shock. Use of vasopressin is recommended when norepinephrine fails to maintain a mean arterial pressure above 65mmHg or in salvage. Several studies failed to show a superiority of vasopressin over norepinephrine but none evaluated the effect of an early association on organ failure. Terlipressin is a pro-drug of vasopressin which has the same vasoconstrictor effect. We hypothesize that the early association of terlipressin and norepinephrine during septic shock reduces organ failure. This bi centric, double-blinded, randomised, controlled versus placebo study includes 40 patients. Randomisation will be stratified between centers (two university affiliated intensive care units of Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France). All patients with septic shock needing more than 0,5µg/kg/min of norepinephrine to reach PAM objectives are randomised, after hemodynamic evaluation and optimisation, to receive continuous infusions of terlipressin (0,01mg/kg/min) or placebo (physiologic serum). The 2 groups receive steroid therapy (continuous intravenous hydrocortisone perfusion) at this time. Clinicians are blinded of perfusion used. Use of terlipressin remains possible in salvage when patients need more of 1µg/kg/min of norepinephrine on physician's decision. Patients with acute ischemic or septic heart failure are excluded of the study. Primary objective is sepsis related Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score difference between the groups at day 3. Secondary objectives are mortality at day 28, lactates clearance in the first 48hours, renal function (evaluates with AKIN criteria) and use of renal replacement therapy.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Terlipressin

Administration of terlipressine

OTHER

Placebo

Administration of placebo

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Nov 8, 2017

  2. Study start

    Jul 27, 2018

  3. Primary completion

    Dec 1, 2018

  4. Study completion

    Jun 1, 2019

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Nov 29, 2018

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score difference between the groups

Time frame · Day 3

Secondary outcomes

Mortality rate

Time frame · Day 28

Lactates clearance

Time frame · 48 hours

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Older than 18 years * Dose of norepinephrine greater than 0.3 μg / kg / min * Lactate greater than 2.0 mmol / l Exclusion Criteria: * A left heart failure objectified in ultrasound transthoracique by a fraction of left(awkward) ejection of the ventricle lower than 30 % either by thermodilution transpulmonaire with a cardiac index lower than 2,5 l / min / m2 after optimization of the volémie or a central venous saturation in oxygen ( SVcO2) lower than 60 % after optimization of the blood volume. * Minors * Pregnant * Not having terlipressin allergy * Not having excipient allergy * A history known for recent acute coronary syndrome (\< 3mois) * An acute coronary syndrome defined by an increase of the troponine and a rise of the segment ST in the electrocardiogram

Study locations

1 registered sites.

France. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille

Marseille, France

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Terlipressin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.