DRUG
Placebo
Placebo injected twice daily
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
467
Locations
337
Results
Posted
Publications
0
Study summary
A 46-week study to compare the efficacy of relamorelin with that of placebo in participants with diabetic gastroparesis (DG). At the end of the 40-week Treatment Period, participants will either continue on relamorelin or placebo for 6 additional weeks.
Interventions
DRUG
Placebo injected twice daily
DRUG
Relamorelin 10 μg injected twice daily
Timeline
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
Study start
Jan 24, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2020
Study completion
Oct 30, 2020
Results posted
Dec 22, 2021
Registry updated
Dec 22, 2021
Outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS) of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to Week 12 of this study
Participants assessed the severity of diabetic gastroparesis symptoms daily using the Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary (DGSSD), recorded in an electronic diary (e-diary). The DGSSS was derived as the sum of the weekly averages of the 4 DGSSD items: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness and bloating. Each symptom was scored using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no or not at all uncomfortable to 10=worst possible or most uncomfortable for a total possible DGSSS of 0 (best) to 40 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Week 6 to Week 12
The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. A Vomiting Responder was defined as a participant with zero weekly vomiting episodes during each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nausea Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Nausea Responder was defined as a participant with improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for nausea at each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. Nausea was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded in the e-diary by the participant using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no nausea to 10=worst possible nausea. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Abdominal Pain Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
An Abdominal Pain Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for abdominal pain at each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. Abdominal pain was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded in the e-diary by the participant using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no abdominal pain to 10=the worst possible abdominal pain and was recorded in an e-diary. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Bloating Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Bloating Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for bloating at each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. Bloating was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded by the participant in the e-diary using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no bloating and 10=the worst possible bloating and was recorded in the e-diary. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Postprandial Fullness Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Postprandial Fullness Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for Postprandial Fullness at each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. Postprandial Fullness was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded by the participant in the e-diary using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no feeling of fullness until finishing a meal (best) to 10=feeling full after only a few bites (worst). Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.
Change From Baseline to Week 40 in the Average Weekly DGSSS of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 37 to Week 40)
Participants assessed the severity of diabetic gastroparesis symptoms daily using the DGSSD, recorded in an e-diary. The DGSSS was derived as the sum of the weekly averages (Week 37 to Week 40) of the 4 DGSSD items: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness and bloating. Each symptom was scored using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no or not at all uncomfortable to 10=worst possible or most uncomfortable for a total possible DGSSS of 0 (best) to 40 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period of the previous studies.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion at Week 40 of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Week 37 to Week 40
The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. A Vomiting Responder was defined as a participant with zero weekly vomiting episodes during the last 4 weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period.
Change From Baseline to Week 40 in the Average Weekly Number of Vomiting Episodes of the Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 37 to Week 40)
The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. The average weekly number of vomiting episodes were derived as the average of the weekly number of vomiting episodes in the last 4 weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.
Change From Baseline to Week 46 in the Average Weekly DGSSS of the Randomized-Withdrawal Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 41 to Week 46)
Participants assessed the severity of diabetic gastroparesis symptoms daily using the DGSSD, recorded in an e-diary. The DGSSS was derived as the sum of the weekly averages of the 4 DGSSD items: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness and bloating. Each symptom was scored using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no or not at all uncomfortable to 10=worst possible or most uncomfortable for a total possible DGSSS of 0 (best) to 40 (worst). Average weekly scores are derived as the average of the weekly scores from the 6 weeks of the RW Period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.
Change From Baseline to Week 46 in the Average Weekly Number of Vomiting Episodes of the Randomized-Withdrawal Period
Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 41 to Week 46)
The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. Average weekly number of vomiting episodes are derived as the average of the weekly number of vomiting episodes from the six weeks of the RW Period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.
Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time frame · First dose of study drug to within 30 days of the last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 50 weeks)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE is an AE that begins or worsens after receiving study drug.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria: * Participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all the following criteria apply: * Participant met all inclusion/exclusion criteria of either Protocol RLM-MD-01 (NCT03285308) or Protocol RLM-MD-02 (NCT03426345) and successfully completed the study * Able to provide written informed consent (IC) prior to any study procedures and willing and able to comply with study procedures * In the opinion of the investigator, the participant demonstrated adequate compliance with the study procedures in Study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02 Exclusion Criteria: * Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: * Participant is not willing or able to abide by the restrictions regarding concomitant medicine use * Participant is planning to receive an investigational drug (other than study treatment) or investigational device at any time during Study RLM-MD-03 * Participant has an unresolved adverse event (AE) or a clinically significant finding on physical examination, clinical laboratory test, or 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) that, in the investigator's opinion, would limit the participant's ability to participate in or complete the study * Any other reason that, in the investigator's opinion, would confound proper interpretation of the study or expose a participant to unacceptable risk, including renal, hepatic or cardiopulmonary disease
Study locations
Argentina · Australia · Austria · Belgium · Brazil · Bulgaria · Canada · Colombia · Denmark · Germany · Hungary · India · Israel · Latvia · Malaysia · Mexico · Philippines · Poland · Russia · Singapore · South Africa · South Korea · Thailand · Ukraine · United Kingdom · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.
North Alabama Research Center, LLC
Athens, Alabama, United States
Digestive Health Specialist of the South East
Dothan, Alabama, United States
G & L Research, LLC
Foley, Alabama, United States
Alabama Medical Group, PC
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Del Sol Research Management, LLC
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Phoenix Clinical LLC.
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Del Sol Research Management, LLC
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Preferred Research Partners, Inc.
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Applied Research Center of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Arkansas Gastroenterology
North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unity Health - Searcy Medical Center
Searcy, Arkansas, United States
Hope Clinical Research
Canoga Park, California, United States
GW Research Inc
Chula Vista, California, United States
Kindred Medical Institute for Clinical Trials, LLC
Corona, California, United States
Aurora Care Clinic, LLC
Costa Mesa, California, United States
Diagnamics Inc.
Encinitas, California, United States
VVCRD Research
Garden Grove, California, United States
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, United States
Om Research LLC
Lancaster, California, United States
Torrance Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
Lomita, California, United States
Angel City Research Inc.
Los Angeles, California, United States
TriWest Research Associates
Poway, California, United States
Medical Associates Research Group, Inc
San Diego, California, United States
Syrentis Clinical Research
Santa Ana, California, United States
Publications
No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.
Related trials
Allergan · Gastroparesis
Phase 3
Terminated
202
2021-12
Allergan · Gastroparesis · Diabetes Mellitus
Phase 3
Terminated
450
2021-11
Allergan · Gastroparesis · Diabetes Mellitus
Phase 3
Terminated
311
2021-08
Allergan · Gastroparesis · Diabetes Mellitus
Phase 3
Terminated
336
2021-07
Allergan · Diabetes Mellitus · Diabetes Mellitus Complications
Phase 2
Completed
393
2019-07
Motus Therapeutics, Inc. · Diabetes Mellitus · Diabetes Mellitus Complications
Phase 2
Completed
204
2016-09
Motus Therapeutics, Inc. · Anorexia Nervosa
Phase 2
Completed
20
2016-09
Motus Therapeutics, Inc. · Constipation
Phase 2
Completed
48
2016-09
Related PeptideStat pages
Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.