Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT03420781·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Relamorelin in Diabetic Gastroparesis Study 03

Status

Terminated

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

467

Locations

337

Results

Posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

A 46-week study to compare the efficacy of relamorelin with that of placebo in participants with diabetic gastroparesis (DG). At the end of the 40-week Treatment Period, participants will either continue on relamorelin or placebo for 6 additional weeks.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Placebo

Placebo injected twice daily

DRUG

Relamorelin

Relamorelin 10 μg injected twice daily

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Feb 5, 2018

  2. Study start

    Jan 24, 2018

  3. Primary completion

    Oct 30, 2020

  4. Study completion

    Oct 30, 2020

  5. Results posted

    Dec 22, 2021

  6. Registry updated

    Dec 22, 2021

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS) of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to Week 12 of this study

Participants assessed the severity of diabetic gastroparesis symptoms daily using the Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary (DGSSD), recorded in an electronic diary (e-diary). The DGSSS was derived as the sum of the weekly averages of the 4 DGSSD items: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness and bloating. Each symptom was scored using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no or not at all uncomfortable to 10=worst possible or most uncomfortable for a total possible DGSSS of 0 (best) to 40 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Week 6 to Week 12

The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. A Vomiting Responder was defined as a participant with zero weekly vomiting episodes during each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period.

Secondary outcomes

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nausea Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 6 to Week 12)

A Nausea Responder was defined as a participant with improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for nausea at each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. Nausea was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded in the e-diary by the participant using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no nausea to 10=worst possible nausea. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Abdominal Pain Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 6 to Week 12)

An Abdominal Pain Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for abdominal pain at each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. Abdominal pain was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded in the e-diary by the participant using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no abdominal pain to 10=the worst possible abdominal pain and was recorded in an e-diary. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Bloating Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 6 to Week 12)

A Bloating Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for bloating at each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. Bloating was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded by the participant in the e-diary using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no bloating and 10=the worst possible bloating and was recorded in the e-diary. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Postprandial Fullness Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the First 12-weeks of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 6 to Week 12)

A Postprandial Fullness Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for Postprandial Fullness at each of the last 6 weeks of the first 12-weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. Postprandial Fullness was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded by the participant in the e-diary using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no feeling of fullness until finishing a meal (best) to 10=feeling full after only a few bites (worst). Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.

Change From Baseline to Week 40 in the Average Weekly DGSSS of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 37 to Week 40)

Participants assessed the severity of diabetic gastroparesis symptoms daily using the DGSSD, recorded in an e-diary. The DGSSS was derived as the sum of the weekly averages (Week 37 to Week 40) of the 4 DGSSD items: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness and bloating. Each symptom was scored using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no or not at all uncomfortable to 10=worst possible or most uncomfortable for a total possible DGSSS of 0 (best) to 40 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period of the previous studies.

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion at Week 40 of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Week 37 to Week 40

The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. A Vomiting Responder was defined as a participant with zero weekly vomiting episodes during the last 4 weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period.

Change From Baseline to Week 40 in the Average Weekly Number of Vomiting Episodes of the Treatment Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 37 to Week 40)

The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. The average weekly number of vomiting episodes were derived as the average of the weekly number of vomiting episodes in the last 4 weeks of the 40-week Treatment Period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.

Change From Baseline to Week 46 in the Average Weekly DGSSS of the Randomized-Withdrawal Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 41 to Week 46)

Participants assessed the severity of diabetic gastroparesis symptoms daily using the DGSSD, recorded in an e-diary. The DGSSS was derived as the sum of the weekly averages of the 4 DGSSD items: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness and bloating. Each symptom was scored using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no or not at all uncomfortable to 10=worst possible or most uncomfortable for a total possible DGSSS of 0 (best) to 40 (worst). Average weekly scores are derived as the average of the weekly scores from the 6 weeks of the RW Period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.

Change From Baseline to Week 46 in the Average Weekly Number of Vomiting Episodes of the Randomized-Withdrawal Period

Time frame · Baseline (14-day Run-in Period of the previous relamorelin study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02) to (Week 41 to Week 46)

The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. Average weekly number of vomiting episodes are derived as the average of the weekly number of vomiting episodes from the six weeks of the RW Period. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period in the previous studies.

Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Time frame · First dose of study drug to within 30 days of the last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 50 weeks)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE is an AE that begins or worsens after receiving study drug.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all the following criteria apply: * Participant met all inclusion/exclusion criteria of either Protocol RLM-MD-01 (NCT03285308) or Protocol RLM-MD-02 (NCT03426345) and successfully completed the study * Able to provide written informed consent (IC) prior to any study procedures and willing and able to comply with study procedures * In the opinion of the investigator, the participant demonstrated adequate compliance with the study procedures in Study RLM-MD-01 or RLM-MD-02 Exclusion Criteria: * Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: * Participant is not willing or able to abide by the restrictions regarding concomitant medicine use * Participant is planning to receive an investigational drug (other than study treatment) or investigational device at any time during Study RLM-MD-03 * Participant has an unresolved adverse event (AE) or a clinically significant finding on physical examination, clinical laboratory test, or 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) that, in the investigator's opinion, would limit the participant's ability to participate in or complete the study * Any other reason that, in the investigator's opinion, would confound proper interpretation of the study or expose a participant to unacceptable risk, including renal, hepatic or cardiopulmonary disease

Study locations

337 registered sites.

Argentina · Australia · Austria · Belgium · Brazil · Bulgaria · Canada · Colombia · Denmark · Germany · Hungary · India · Israel · Latvia · Malaysia · Mexico · Philippines · Poland · Russia · Singapore · South Africa · South Korea · Thailand · Ukraine · United Kingdom · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

North Alabama Research Center, LLC

Athens, Alabama, United States

Digestive Health Specialist of the South East

Dothan, Alabama, United States

G & L Research, LLC

Foley, Alabama, United States

Alabama Medical Group, PC

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Del Sol Research Management, LLC

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Phoenix Clinical LLC.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Del Sol Research Management, LLC

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Preferred Research Partners, Inc.

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Applied Research Center of Arkansas

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Arkansas Gastroenterology

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Unity Health - Searcy Medical Center

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

Hope Clinical Research

Canoga Park, California, United States

GW Research Inc

Chula Vista, California, United States

Kindred Medical Institute for Clinical Trials, LLC

Corona, California, United States

Aurora Care Clinic, LLC

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Diagnamics Inc.

Encinitas, California, United States

VVCRD Research

Garden Grove, California, United States

University of California San Diego

La Jolla, California, United States

Om Research LLC

Lancaster, California, United States

Torrance Clinical Research Institute, Inc.

Lomita, California, United States

Angel City Research Inc.

Los Angeles, California, United States

TriWest Research Associates

Poway, California, United States

Medical Associates Research Group, Inc

San Diego, California, United States

Syrentis Clinical Research

Santa Ana, California, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Relamorelin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.