DRUG
Placebo
Placebo injected subcutaneously twice daily.
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
311
Locations
240
Results
Posted
Publications
0
Study summary
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of relamorelin compared to placebo in participants with diabetic gastroparesis. Participants will report daily severity scores of their diabetic gastroparesis symptoms.
Interventions
DRUG
Placebo injected subcutaneously twice daily.
DRUG
Relamorelin 10 μg injected twice daily for 12 weeks.
Timeline
First posted
Feb 8, 2018
Study start
Feb 16, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 16, 2020
Study completion
Jul 16, 2020
Results posted
Aug 6, 2021
Registry updated
Aug 6, 2021
Outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS)
Time frame · Baseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to Week 12
Participants assessed the severity of diabetic gastroparesis symptoms daily using the Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary (DGSSD), recorded in an electronic diary (e-diary). The DGSSS was derived as the sum of the weekly averages of the 4 DGSSD items: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness and bloating. Each symptom was scored using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0= no or not at all uncomfortable to 10= worst possible or most uncomfortable for a total possible DGSSS of 0 (best) to 40 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the run-in period.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period
Time frame · Week 6 to Week 12
The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. A Vomiting Responder was defined as a participant with zero weekly vomiting episodes during each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nausea Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Nausea Responder was defined as a participant with improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for nausea at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Nausea was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded in the e-diary by the participant using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0= no nausea to 10= worst possible nausea.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Abdominal Pain Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
An Abdominal Pain Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for abdominal pain at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Abdominal pain was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded in the e-diary by the participant using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0= no abdominal pain to 10= the worst possible abdominal pain and was recorded in an e-diary.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Bloating Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Bloating Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for bloating at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Bloating was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded by the participant in the e-diary using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0= no bloating and 10= the worst possible bloating and was recorded in the e-diary.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Postprandial Fullness Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period
Time frame · Baseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Postprandial Fullness Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for Postprandial Fullness at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Postprandial Fullness was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded by the participant in the e-diary using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0= no feeling of fullness until finishing a meal (best) to 10= feeling full after only a few bites (worst).
Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time frame · Up to approximately 16 weeks
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE is an AE that begins or worsens after receiving study drug.
Number of Participants With Potential Clinically Significant (PCS) Clinical Laboratory Results
Time frame · Up to 12 weeks
Clinical Laboratory tests included Hematology, Chemistry and Urinalysis tests. The investigator determined if the results were clinically significant. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCS value at Baseline and met the PCS criterion at least once during postbaseline are reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Trends for Vital Signs
Time frame · Up to 12 weeks
Vital Signs included assessments of heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and body temperature. The investigator determined if the abnormal results were clinically significant.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results
Time frame · Up to 12 weeks
A standard 12-lead ECG was performed. The investigator determined if the abnormal results were clinically significant.
Number of Participants With a ≥1% Increase in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HBA1c)
Time frame · Baseline (Day 1) up to 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Anti-relamorelin Antibody Testing Results by Visit
Time frame · Baseline (Day 1), Day 14, Day 28, Day 84, and End of Treatment (Up to Day 84)
A blood sample was collected that was sent to a laboratory for an anti-relamorelin antibody screening test. A positive screening test was confirmed by an immunodepletion assay. The number of participants in each of the following categories are reported: Negative Screening Test, Positive Screening Test, Negative Confirmatory Test, and Positive Confirmatory Test at each time point.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus * Meet the per protocol criteria of diabetic gastroparesis * Compliance with diary * Compliance with the per protocol study treatment dosing instructions Exclusion Criteria: * Currently receiving nutrition intravenously, by nasogastric tube, or other feeding tube * Actively experiencing anorexia nervosa, binge-eating, bulimia or other eating disorder at the time of Screening (Visit 1) * Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, also a history of non-celiac gluten sensitivity * History of gastrointestinal disorders that may be similar to gastroparesis * Functional dyspepsia diagnosed before the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
Study locations
Argentina · Austria · Belgium · Brazil · Canada · Colombia · Denmark · Germany · Hungary · Latvia · Mexico · Russia · South Africa · United Kingdom · United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.
North Alabama Research Center, LLC
Athens, Alabama, United States
Synexus Clinical Research US - Simon Williamson Clinic
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
G & L Research, LLC
Foley, Alabama, United States
Alabama Medical Group, PC
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Applied Research Center of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unity Health - Searcy Medical Center
Searcy, Arkansas, United States
GW Research Inc.
Chula Vista, California, United States
Diagnamics Inc.
Encinitas, California, United States
Fresno Clinical Research Center
Fresno, California, United States
Torrance Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
Lomita, California, United States
Tibor Rubin VA Medical Center
Long Beach, California, United States
Angel City Research Inc.
Los Angeles, California, United States
Facey Medical Foundation
Mission Hills, California, United States
United Medical Doctors
Murrieta, California, United States
Stanford Hospital, Digestive Health Clinic
Palo Alto, California, United States
TriWest Research Associates
Poway, California, United States
Optimal Research California
San Diego, California, United States
Syrentis Clinical Research
Santa Ana, California, United States
New Hope Research Development
Whittier, California, United States
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Colorado Springs Family Practice
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Gastroenterology Associates of Fairfield County, P.C.
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
Visionary Investigators Network
Aventura, Florida, United States
Clinical Research of West Florida
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Publications
No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.
Related trials
Allergan · Gastroparesis · Diabetes Mellitus
Phase 3
Terminated
467
2021-12
Allergan · Gastroparesis
Phase 3
Terminated
202
2021-12
Allergan · Gastroparesis · Diabetes Mellitus
Phase 3
Terminated
450
2021-11
Allergan · Gastroparesis · Diabetes Mellitus
Phase 3
Terminated
336
2021-07
Allergan · Diabetes Mellitus · Diabetes Mellitus Complications
Phase 2
Completed
393
2019-07
Motus Therapeutics, Inc. · Diabetes Mellitus · Diabetes Mellitus Complications
Phase 2
Completed
204
2016-09
Motus Therapeutics, Inc. · Anorexia Nervosa
Phase 2
Completed
20
2016-09
Motus Therapeutics, Inc. · Constipation
Phase 2
Completed
48
2016-09
Related PeptideStat pages
Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.