Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT06122753·Not applicable·INTERVENTIONAL

Preemptive TIPS for Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients With Occlusive Portal Vein Thrombosis

Status

Not yet recruiting

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

120

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

2

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) can lead to a further increase in portal venous pressure and increase the risk of rebleeding. Whether patients with acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding with occlusive PVT benefit from preemptive TIPS is still controversial. The present study is directed at comparing the outcome of patients with acute variceal bleeding with occlusive PVT treated by standard therapy (vasoactive drugs + endoscopic variceal ligation) with or without preemptive TIPS (performed during the first 1-3 days after endoscopic procedure). The primary outcome is survival free of variceal rebleeding at 6 weeks from inclusion.

Full detailed description

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis, and the cumulative incidence of PVT is 4.6%, 8.2%, and 10.7% at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively. PVT can lead to a further increase in portal venous pressure and increase the risk of rebleeding. According to Baveno VII, PVT can be classified according to the degree of occlusion of the portal trunk as complete occlusion (no continuous luminal structure), partial occlusion (≥50% thrombus obstruction of the lumen), mild occlusion (\<50% thrombus obstruction of the lumen), or spongiotic degeneration (a large number of collateral vessels of the portal vein, with no visualization of the main portal vein). The results of a recent observational study suggested that patients with severe PVT with ≥50% thrombotic luminal obstruction had higher 6-week rebleeding rates (8.8% vs. 3.8%) and 1-year rebleeding rates (29.4% vs. 21.4%) after acute variceal bleeding. Our previous clinical study showed that patients with cirrhotic PVT treated with TIPS had lower rebleeding rates and significantly higher rates of portal vein recanalization, and it was inferred that patients with acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding with severe PVT might benefit from preemptive TIPS. Therefore, we propose to conduct a multicentre randomized controlled trial to enroll patients with acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding with occlusive PVT to compare the preemptive TIPS with the standardized therapy. The outcomes are rates of mortality, rebleeding, and complications.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

PROCEDURE

preemptive TIPS

The TIPS procedure should be performed within 72 hours after the initial endoscopic examination or treatment. An 8 mm Viatorr stent will be used for TIPS establishment. The aim will be to reduce the portal pressure gradient below 12 mm Hg. Embolization, either with coils or glue, can be performed, if it is felt necessary, especially in patients where portography shows the filling of large portosystemic collaterals feeding the varices. After TIPS, anticoagulation will not be used as a rule but is allowed if the attending physician thinks that it is warranted.

PROCEDURE

standard second prophylaxis

Patients will receive vasoactive drugs up to 5 days; then a non-selective beta-blocker (carvedilol) will be started with an initial dose of 6.25 mg, the dose of propranolol will be increased to 12.5 mg. The second elective session of endoscopic band ligation will be performed within the first 28 days after the initial endoscopic treatment. The following sessions will be performed at 28 +/- 3 days intervals until variceal eradication. Once eradication is achieved, endoscopic monitoring will be performed every 6 months. If varices reappear, new band ligation will be performed.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Nov 8, 2023

  2. Study start

    Jan 2024

  3. Primary completion

    Dec 2026

  4. Study completion

    Dec 2026

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Nov 8, 2023

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

6-week mortality

Time frame · 6 weeks

The rate of mortality during the first 6 weeks after inclusion in the study.

Secondary outcomes

5-day treatment failure

Time frame · 5 days

Incidence of cases requiring adjustment of treatment strategy within 5 days of initial standardised treatment: vomiting of blood or drainage of ≥100 ml of fresh blood from a gastric tube after 2 hours of treatment, hypovolemic shock, drop in haemoglobin of 30 g/L or more within 24 hours without transfusion.

1-year mortality

Time frame · 1 year

The rate of mortality during the first 1 year after inclusion in the study.

decompensation events

Time frame · 1 year

Rates with rebleeding, new overt ascites (moderate-heavy) or increased degree of ascites, overt hepatic encephalopathy (West-Heaven grades 2-4), or jaundice (total bilirubin \>51 mmol/L) from 5 days after initial standardised treatment up to 1 year.

adverse events

Time frame · 1 year

Events of various complications such as infections, new tumours, organ failure, peptic ulcers, etc., occurring after randomisation up to the follow-up period.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Cirrhosis (diagnosed by imaging, laboratory tests, clinical symptoms, or liver biopsy); * Admission due to acute bleeding from esophagogastric varices; * Thrombus in the main trunk of the portal vein occupying ≥50% of the lumen. Exclusion Criteria: * Prior treatment with TIPS or surgical shunt; * Presence of contraindications to endoscopic treatment, carvedilol, or TIPS; * Presence of hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria; * Presence of other systemic malignant tumors with expected survival time not exceeding 6 months; * Presence of uncontrollable infection or sepsis; * Presence of cardiac, pulmonary, or renal failure; * Pregnant or lactating women; * Refusal to sign the informed consent form.

Study locations

1 registered sites.

China. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

West China Hospital of Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Related trials

More studies on Terlipressin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.