Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT07103694·Not applicable·OBSERVATIONAL

i-NEED: NEw migrainE Drugs Database

Status

Recruiting

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

2,641

Locations

2

Results

Not posted

Publications

12

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA) starting in 2018, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) represent the first true revolution in the preventive treatment of migraine due to their selectivity and specificity. To date, four anti-CGRP mAbs have been developed for the preventive treatment of migraine: eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab.Anti-CGRP mAbs constitute not only the first specific and selective treatment for the prevention of migraine but also the most extensively studied pharmacological category in this field, considering the vast and complex populations examined. The clinical effects of the various mAbs are substantially comparable and are characterized by several fundamental aspects: * High efficacy in both episodic and chronic migraine, with the presence of super-responders who experience a reduction in the average monthly number of migraine days of \>75% (or even 100%) compared to before treatment. * Efficacy that is independent of the clinical form of migraine - with or without aura - and regardless of whether there is analgesic overuse. * Efficacy maintained even in the presence of depressive or anxious comorbidities. * Rapid onset of action (even more pronounced with eptinezumab), with the therapeutic effect appearing within the first week in most cases. * Excellent tolerability with an absence of class-specific adverse events. * Outstanding treatment adherence and a very low rate of treatment discontinuation in the long term. It should also be noted that the development of anti-drug antibodies or neutralizing antibodies to anti-CGRP mAbs is rare and does not significantly impact the efficacy or tolerability of treatment. Future clinical practice will need to clarify several additional aspects, such as: 1) whether treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs can modify the course of migraine; 2) the appropriate approach regarding any traditional preventive treatment (whether to continue or discontinue it); 3) the definition of the characteristics of non-responders; 4) the definition of patients with a delayed response to treatment. Gepants are oral antagonists of the CGRP receptor. Among the four gepants synthesized so far (atogepant, rimegepant, ubrogepant, zavegepant), atogepant and rimegepant are currently available in Italy. Atogepant has proven to be an effective and well-tolerated option for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraines. Rimegepant is effective for both acute treatment and prevention of migraines, with a favorable safety profile and flexible oral administration. Lasmiditan is the first ditan effective for migraine attack and it represents a new therapeutic option for patients with contraindications to triptans, due to the presence of vascular risk factors, or for patients who experience undesirable side effects with these, thus increasing the therapeutic possibilities for the symptomatic treatment of migraine. The combination of sumatriptan 85 mg and naproxen sodium 500 mg is indicated for the acute treatment of migraine attacks in adult patients for whom sumatriptan monotherapy is insufficient.

Full detailed description

The European Headache Federation has published detailed guidelines on the state of the art regarding evidence of effectiveness in reducing the frequency and intensity of headache episodes, as well as the safety and tolerability of the four monoclonal antibodies under "ideal" experimental conditions, with patients selected based on stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. This selection limits the direct transferability of the conclusions of these studies to clinical reality. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate, in a clinical practice setting, the real effectiveness in reducing the monthly frequency of migraine days and the tolerability and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in a real-world evidence context. The study may later include all drugs that become available for this condition, subject to authorization by the competent Italian authority. The present extension of the I-NEED study aims to integrate the collection and evaluation of real-life data on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prophylaxis with the study of efficacy, safety, and tolerability-also in a real-world evidence context-of gepants in the prophylaxis of episodic and chronic migraine, and of rimegepant, ditans, and the sumatriptan-naproxen combination in the acute treatment of migraine.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies

erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab

DRUG

gepants

atogepant, rimegepant

DRUG

combination of sumatriptan and naproxen

combination of sumatriptan and naproxen

DRUG

ditan

lasmiditan

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Aug 5, 2025

  2. Study start

    Mar 24, 2022

  3. Primary completion

    Dec 30, 2026

  4. Study completion

    Dec 31, 2026

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Jun 11, 2026

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

effectiveness of innovative drug as migraine prophylaxis

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

2 hour-pain freedom

Time frame · 2 hours

Percentage of patients reporting complete pain relief within 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

Secondary outcomes

safety and tolerability of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

type and number of adverse events occurring during the study period (event details, duration, severity and action taken)

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on symptomatic medication use and medication overuse headache

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

reduction in the average monthly consumption of analgesics in patients undergoing treatment with innovative drugs

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

mean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

mean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment

impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

Time frame · the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

mean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Age more or equal 18 years; * Males and females; * Willingness to sign the informed consent; * Episodic migraine for the use of drug indicated for migraine attack * High frequency episodic migraine, at least 8 days per month of disabling migraine in the past 3 months; * Chronic migraine, according to the ICHD-III criteria; Exclusion Criteria: * Other headaches different than migraine; * Known intolerance to the eccipients; * Vascular disease or Raynaud.

Study locations

2 registered sites.

Italy. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS

Milan, Italy, Italy

IRCCS San Raffaele

Rome, Italy, Italy

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 30651064Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, Reuter U, Terwindt G, Mitsikostas DD, Martelletti P. European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. 2019 Jan 16;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0955-y.PMID 29171821Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallstrom Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F, Sapra S, Picard H, Mikol DD, Lenz RA. A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 30;377(22):2123-2132. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848.PMID 30360965Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD, Klatt J. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018 Nov 24;392(10161):2280-2287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0. Epub 2018 Oct 22.PMID 29813147Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of Galcanezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: The EVOLVE-1 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):1080-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212.PMID 30446596Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018 Dec 11;91(24):e2211-e2221. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640. Epub 2018 Nov 16.PMID 29800211Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, Grozinski-Wolff M, Yang R, Ma Y, Aycardi E. Effect of Fremanezumab Compared With Placebo for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 May 15;319(19):1999-2008. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4853.PMID 29171818Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, Grozinski-Wolff M, Yang R, Ma Y, Aycardi E. Fremanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 30;377(22):2113-2122. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709038.PMID 25297013Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Olesen J, Ashina M, Wilks K, Kudrow D, Kroll R, Kohrman B, Bargar R, Hirman J, Smith J; ALD403 study investigators. Safety and efficacy of ALD403, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of frequent episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Nov;13(11):1100-1107. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70209-1. Epub 2014 Oct 5.PMID 32209650Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith J, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM, Hirman J, Pederson S, Allan B, Cady R. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine: PROMISE-2. Neurology. 2020 Mar 31;94(13):e1365-e1377. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009169. Epub 2020 Mar 24.PMID 31291516Lipton RB, Croop R, Stock EG, Stock DA, Morris BA, Frost M, Dubowchik GM, Conway CM, Coric V, Goadsby PJ. Rimegepant, an Oral Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonist, for Migraine. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):142-149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811090.PMID 31132795Goadsby PJ, Wietecha LA, Dennehy EB, Kuca B, Case MG, Aurora SK, Gaul C. Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine. Brain. 2019 Jul 1;142(7):1894-1904. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz134.PMID 17405970Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Stark SR, O'Carroll CP, Adelman JU, O'Donnell FJ, Alexander WJ, Spruill SE, Barrett PS, Lener SE. Sumatriptan-naproxen for acute treatment of migraine: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007 Apr 4;297(13):1443-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.13.1443.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Calcitonin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.