Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT07699432·Not applicable·INTERVENTIONAL

Different Kinematics Within a Single-File System and Postoperative Pain

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

75

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

12

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluating the influence of single file rotary system for root canal instrumentation using different kinematics on postoperative pain, the primary purpose: measuring post-operative pain by Numerical rating scale in a cohort population treatyed in Jordan Universoit of science and technology post graduate clinics with previously intittaed root canal treatement and could include any of the following: sex/gender, age groups (18-65 ), and healthy volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer \[is/are: * Is there any difference in postoperative pain after root canal treatment with different kinamtics * Is this correlated with the level of cytokines measured taken from inside the canal system before and after treament whioch will be analyzed by the ELISA Kit for pain biomarkers. * Is this related to in vitro debris extrusion, and can it validate previous research with the same methodology for debris extrusion measurement Researchers will compare 5 groups, which are Canal pro jeni, Continuous clockwise rotation (CCR), Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR), Forward reciprocating motion (REC), and Twisted Adaptive motion (TFA). All motions will be used with the One Curve file system Participants will report the level of pain after traatment level of cytokines will be measured by taking samples from the periapical area before, during, and after trematemtn

Full detailed description

This prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial will evaluate whether the kinematics used during root canal instrumentation with a single-file system influence postoperative pain and the local expression of pain-related neuropeptides. The trial will be conducted in adult patients requiring endodontic treatment of mandibular molars. Eligible participants will be enrolled after clinical and radiographic assessment and after obtaining written informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of five treatment groups. In all groups, canal shaping will be performed using the same One Curve nickel-titanium single-file system, while the kinematic motion used to activate the file will differ between groups. The tested kinematics will include CanalPro Jeni motion, continuous clockwise rotation, optimum torque reverse motion, forward reciprocating motion, and twisted adaptive motion. This design allows the effect of instrument motion to be assessed while maintaining the same file system across all study arms. All treatments will be performed under standardized clinical conditions. Local anesthesia will be administered and the tooth will be isolated with a rubber dam. Access cavity preparation, canal identification, manual scouting, working length determination, and radiographic confirmation will be completed using a standardized approach. Initial irrigation will be performed before instrumentation, and the allocated kinematic protocol will then be used for canal preparation according to the study protocol. Periapical fluid samples will be collected using sterile paper points at predefined procedural time points. The sampling schedule will include collection during the initial stage of canal preparation, after instrumentation, and at the follow-up visit. Samples will be transferred to sterile tubes and stored under appropriate laboratory conditions until analysis. The collected samples will be analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods to quantify selected neuropeptides associated with inflammatory pain response, including substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide. The clinical treatment will be completed over two visits. At the first visit, the canals will be prepared using the allocated kinematic protocol and irrigated using a standardized irrigation sequence. Intracanal medicament will be placed between visits, and the tooth will be temporized. At the second visit, patient-reported pain and percussion sensitivity will be recorded, the temporary restoration and intracanal medicament will be removed, and periapical fluid will be collected before completion of the final irrigation protocol. The canals will then be dried, obturated using gutta-percha and resin-based sealer, and restored with an adhesive restorative material. A postoperative radiograph will be taken as part of routine treatment documentation. Postoperative pain will be recorded by the participant at scheduled time points after treatment using a standardized pain scale. Clinical follow-up information and laboratory biomarker data will be collected using structured forms. The trial procedures will be performed by trained clinicians, and laboratory analysis will be performed according to the manufacturers' instructions for the selected assay kits. Data handling and storage will follow institutional requirements for clinical research. The analysis will compare postoperative pain scores and biomarker levels between the five kinematic groups. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize participant characteristics, pain scores, and biomarker concentrations. Appropriate statistical tests will be selected according to the type and distribution of the data. The analysis will assess whether differences in file kinematics are associated with differences in patient-reported postoperative pain and changes in pain-related neuropeptide levels.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DEVICE

Twisted Adaptive motion (TFA)

motor that is capable of doing the adaptive motion

DEVICE

canal pro jeni

a new kinematics for root canal treatment

DEVICE

forward reciprocation

endodontic motor with the ability to change reciprocating angles and speed

DEVICE

continuous rotation

endodontic dental motor

DEVICE

Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR)

endodontic motor that is designed for rotate in Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR)

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jul 13, 2026

  2. Study start

    Apr 10, 2024

  3. Primary completion

    May 10, 2026

  4. Study completion

    Sep 10, 2026

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Jul 13, 2026

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Postoperative Pain

Time frame · Up to 48 hours post-treatment

Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a self-reported instrument with scores ranging from a minimum of 0 (no pain) to a maximum of 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicate a worse clinical outcome (more severe pain).

Secondary outcomes

Change in Cytokine Levels

Time frame · From baseline up to Day 3 post-treatment

Measurement of cytokine levels in (pg/mL) to evaluate the inflammatory response. Samples are collected immediately before treatment, immediately following treatment on Day 1, and on Day 3 prior to obturation

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged between 18-65 year * Fully mature roots * Asymptomatic * Not taking neither antibiotics nor analgesics withing last 2 weeks * ASA I and ASA II Exclusion Criteria: * patients that are younger or older than the selected age group 18-65 years - Immature roots * Symptomatic, presence of sinus tract, fistula, or swelling. * patient on medication antibiotics or analgesics withing last 2 weeks -Pregnant women, * retreatment cases, * allergic reactions * resorption in the relevant tooth, * periapical abscess, * apical resorption, systemic diseases,ASA III-VI * inability to understand the treatment procedure * Any mesial canals with initial apical file larger than ISO 20

Study locations

1 registered sites.

Jordan. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Jordan University of science and technology

Irbid, Northen, Jordan

Publications

Results and literature.

PMID 29398090Gundogdu EC, Arslan H. Effects of Various Cryotherapy Applications on Postoperative Pain in Molar Teeth with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Preliminary Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2018 Mar;44(3):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.002. Epub 2018 Feb 3.PMID 36917401Al Omari TMN, La Rosa GRM, Albanna RHI, Tabnjh A, Papale F, Pedulla E. The effect of different kinematics on apical debris extrusion with a single-file system. Odontology. 2023 Oct;111(4):910-915. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00802-3. Epub 2023 Mar 14.PMID 34725547Pirani C, Iacono F, Zamparini F, Generali L, Prati C. Retreatment of Experimental Carrier-Based Obturators with the Remover NiTi Instrument: Evaluation of Apical Extrusion and Effects of New Kinematics. Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 23;2021:2755680. doi: 10.1155/2021/2755680. eCollection 2021.PMID 30113735Gambarini G, Piasecki L, Miccoli G, Gaimari G, Di Giorgio R, Di Nardo D, Azim AA, Testarelli L. Classification and cyclic fatigue evaluation of new kinematics for endodontic instruments. Aust Endod J. 2019 Aug;45(2):154-162. doi: 10.1111/aej.12294. Epub 2018 Aug 16.PMID 24862716Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):852-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 7.PMID 31673858AlOmari T, AlThobiti G, AlThobaiti S, AlOufi F, Masuadi E, Jamleh A. Incidence of postoperative pain after canal shaping by using Reciproc and Twisted File Adaptive systems: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2445-2450. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03106-5. Epub 2019 Nov 1.PMID 22429241Gambarini G, Gergi R, Naaman A, Osta N, Al Sudani D. Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion. Int Endod J. 2012 Sep;45(9):802-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02036.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.PMID 33064376Saricam E, Kayaoglu G. Comparison of OneShape, 2Shape and One Curve endodontic instruments for debris and irrigant extrusion. Dent Med Probl. 2020 Jul-Sep;57(3):255-259. doi: 10.17219/dmp/119771.PMID 27185740Ahn SY, Kim HC, Kim E. Kinematic Effects of Nickel-Titanium Instruments with Reciprocating or Continuous Rotation Motion: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):1009-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 13.PMID 25816688Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016 Mar;49(3):255-70. doi: 10.1111/iej.12452. Epub 2015 Apr 22.PMID 32864731Yammine SD, Jabbour EA. Apically Extruded Debris following Programmed Over Instrumentation of Curved Canals with Three Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments. Eur J Dent. 2021 Feb;15(1):20-26. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714175. Epub 2020 Aug 26.PMID 18570980Caviedes-Bucheli J, Munoz HR, Azuero-Holguin MM, Ulate E. Neuropeptides in dental pulp: the silent protagonists. J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7):773-88. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.010.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Calcitonin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.