Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT07587775·Phase 2·INTERVENTIONAL

The Effect of Osteoporotic Medications on Vertebral Bone Quality Score

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Phase

Phase 2

Enrollment

60

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the change in VBQ score, T score, TBS, and Hounsfield Units (HU) after 3-6 months of treatment with abaloparatide in osteoporotic patients who will undergo spinal fusion and decompression for lumbar degenerative disease. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer is: Does abaloparatide improve bone density in these patients, as defined by VBQ score compared to traditional methods such as DEXA and Hounsfield Units Does abaloparatide reduce the incidence of postoperative mechanical complications, including adjacent segment disease, subsidence, and proximal junctional kyphosis (PKJ)? Participants will undergo a presurgical assessments and trained in clinic on the subcutaneous application of abaloparatide. Prior to treatment, patients will have baseline assessments, including a lumbar MRI, DEXA scan, and lumbar CT. Post-surgically, participants will administer abaloparatide and return to clinic after 3-6 months for follow-up assessments including a new MRI, lumbar CT, and DEXA scan. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years postoperatively to identify complications such as adjacent segment disease, pseudarthrosis, failure of instrumentation, and PJK.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Abaloparatide

3-6 months of treatment with abaloparatide in osteoporotic patients who will undergo spinal fusion and decompression for lumbar degenerative disease

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    May 14, 2026

  2. Study start

    Jun 18, 2026

  3. Primary completion

    Jun 1, 2028

  4. Study completion

    Dec 31, 2028

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Jul 23, 2026

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Improvement in Bone Quality

Time frame · 6 weeks post-op

Improvement in bone quality, using Vertebral Bone Quality

Improvement in Bone Quality

Time frame · 6 weeks post-op

Improvement in bone quality, using Hounsfield Units

Improvement in Bone Quality

Time frame · 6 weeks post-op

Improvement in bone quality, using DEXA (Dual-Energy X-ray ABsorptiometry)

Improvement in Bone Quality

Time frame · 6 months post-op

Improvement in bone quality, using Vertebral Bone Quality

Improvement in Bone Quality

Time frame · 6 months post-op

Improvement in bone quality, using Hounsfield Units

Improvement in Bone Quality

Time frame · 6 months post-op

Improvement in bone quality, using DEXA (Dual-Energy X-ray ABsorptiometry)

Improvement in Bone Quality

Time frame · 12 months post-op

Improvement in bone quality, using Vertebral Bone Quality

Improvement in Bone Quality

Time frame · 12 months post-op

Improvement in bone quality, using Hounsfield Units

Secondary outcomes

Surgical Complications

Time frame · 6 weeks post-operatively

Presence of complications associated with fusion, such as Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, adjacent segment disease, mechanical failure, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.

Surgical Complications

Time frame · 6 months post-operatively

Presence of complications associated with fusion, such as PJK, PJF, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, adjacent segment disease, mechanical failure, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.

Surgical Complications

Time frame · 12 months post-operatively

Presence of complications associated with fusion, such as PJK, PJF, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, adjacent segment disease, mechanical failure, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.

Surgical Complications

Time frame · 24 months post-operatively

Presence of complications associated with fusion, such as PJK, PJF, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, adjacent segment disease, mechanical failure, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
50 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of Osteoporosis based on the following criteria: * Fragility fracture (low trauma fracture similar to a fall from a standing position except for fracture to the skull, face, fingers, and toes) * T score \<-2.5 * T-score -1 to -2.5 with a high FRAX or high TBS adjusted FRAX (with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20% or a 10-year probability of hip fracture ≥3%) * Fulfill criteria for treatment with anabolic therapy, as outlined in the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologist guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women and Evidence-Based Guideline for the management of osteoporosis in men. * Lumbar Degenerative Disease as evidenced by a diagnosis of spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease with spinal stenosis, and degenerative scoliosis * Have or be willing to have a DEXA scan, lumbar MRI, and lumbar CT within 3 months of the start of Abaloparatide * If on thyroid hormone replacement, having been on it for at least 6 months Exclusion Criteria: * Previous lumbar surgery * Past medical history of: sarcoma, including osteosarcoma, paget disease or other skeletal malignancies, unexplained elevations of alkaline phosphatase, prior external beam radiation, and pre-existing hypercalcemia * Diagnosis of secondary osteoporosis * Vitamin D deficit * History of prior treatment with TPTD and ABL

Study locations

1 registered sites.

United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

University at Buffalo Neurosurgery

Buffalo, New York, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Abaloparatide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.