Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT07619495·Not applicable·OBSERVATIONAL

Injectable Semaglutide vs Dulaglutide in Individuals at Cardiovascular Risk

Status

Completed

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

120,000

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale emulation of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Full detailed description

This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the Randomized Controlled Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT-DUPLICATE) initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. It is intended to assess the comparative effectiveness of semaglutide vs dulaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in individuals typically treated in clinical practice who are at low, moderate, and high cardiovascular risk with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and overweight. Although many features of the target trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the target trial. Randomization cannot be achieved in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice. The database study will be a new-user active-comparative study, conducted using 3 national United States claims databases, where the effect of semaglutide vs dulaglutide on the composite end point of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke will be assessed. Clinical guidelines during the study period recommended both injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide for the same indications of glucose lowering and cardiovascular risk reduction.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Semaglutide

Initiation of injectable semaglutide described in electronic health records is used as the exposure.

DRUG

Dulaglutide

Initiation of dulaglutide described in electronic health records is used as the reference.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jun 2, 2026

  2. Study start

    Jan 20, 2026

  3. Primary completion

    Jun 1, 2026

  4. Study completion

    Jun 1, 2026

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Jul 9, 2026

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Time frame · 1 day after cohort entry until outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, death, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA

To evaluate the comparative effect of injectable semaglutide vs dulaglutide on the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients typically treated in clinical practice who are at low, moderate, and high cardiovascular risk with type 2 diabetes and overweight.

Secondary outcomes

Individual components of the primary endpoint, i.e., all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke

Time frame · 1 day after cohort entry until outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, death, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA

To evaluate the comparative effect of injectable semaglutide vs dulaglutide on the individual components of the primary endpoint, i.e., all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients typically treated in clinical practice who are at low, moderate, and high cardiovascular risk with type 2 diabetes and overweight.

Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure

Time frame · 1 day after cohort entry until outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, death, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA

To evaluate the comparative effect of injectable semaglutide vs dulaglutide on the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure in patients typically treated in clinical practice who are at low, moderate, and high cardiovascular risk with type 2 diabetes and overweight.

Hospitalization for heart failure

Time frame · 1 day after cohort entry until outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, death, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA

To evaluate the comparative effect of injectable semaglutide vs dulaglutide on the occurrence of heart failure hospitalizations in patients typically treated in clinical practice who are at low, moderate, and high cardiovascular risk with type 2 diabetes and overweight.

Hospitalization for unstable angina

Time frame · 1 day after cohort entry until outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, death, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA

To evaluate the comparative effect of injectable semaglutide vs dulaglutide on hospitalizations for unstable angina in patients typically treated in clinical practice who are at low, moderate, and high cardiovascular risk with type 2 diabetes and overweight.

Coronary revascularization

Time frame · 1 day after cohort entry until outcome, disenrollment, end of study period, death, 365 days after cohort entry, discontinuation (45 days grace and risk window), switch between study arms, nursing home admission, or start of any other GLP-1-RA

To evaluate the comparative effect of injectable semaglutide vs dulaglutide on the occurrence of coronary revascularization in patients typically treated in clinical practice who are at low, moderate, and high cardiovascular risk with type 2 diabetes and overweight.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Study Period: Optum: Eligible cohort entry period between December 5, 2017 to November 30, 2025. MarketScan: Eligible cohort entry period between December 5, 2017 to September 30, 2023. Medicare: Eligible cohort entry period between December 5, 2017 to September 30, 2020. Inclusion Criteria: * Men or women aged 18 years or older * History of myocardial infarction, stroke, any surgical or percutaneous revascularization procedure * Use of antihypertensive or lipid-lowering drugs * Coronary, carotid, or peripheral artery disease * BMI greater than or equal to 25.0 mg/m2 * Type 2 diabetes Exclusion Criteria: * Medullary thyroid carcinoma * MEN syndrome type 2 * Malignancy * Type 1 diabetes * Secondary diabetes * End-stage renal disease or dialysis * Uncontrolled diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy * Pregnancy * History of bariatric surgery * Prior use of pramlintide or any GLP-1-RA, except semaglutide or dulaglutide * Cardiovascular event or intervention in the last 7 days

Study locations

1 registered sites.

United States. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Semaglutide.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.