Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT03333109·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Study of Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Adult Episodic Migraine Patients

Status

Completed

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

900

Locations

81

Results

Posted

Publications

3

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMG334 in adult patients with episodic migraine

Full detailed description

This study used a single-cohort, 3-treatment arm, randomized, double-blind study design in adult patients with episodic migraine. The subjects were randomized to receive either erenumab or placebo in a 2:3:3 ratio (erenumab 140 mg: erenumab 70 mg: placebo). A screening period of 2 weeks was used to assess initial eligibility, followed by a 4-week baseline period. After randomization/Day 1, visits occurred at four week intervals until Week 12, which was the End of Treatment. The final visit, Last Patient Last Visit was a Safety Follow-Up visit, which occurred 12 weeks later, at Week 24.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

BIOLOGICAL

Erenumab

70 mg/mL pre-filled syringe administered subcutaneously

OTHER

Placebo

Matching placebo in pre-filled syringe administered subcutaneously

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Nov 6, 2017

  2. Study start

    Feb 8, 2018

  3. Primary completion

    Jan 13, 2020

  4. Study completion

    Jan 13, 2020

  5. Results posted

    Mar 9, 2021

  6. Registry updated

    Oct 11, 2021

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days at the Last Month (Month 3) of the Double-blind Treatment Period (DBTP)

Time frame · Baseline up to Month 3

A migraine day was defined as any calendar day in which the subject experienced a qualified migraine headache defined as a migraine with or without aura, lasting for ≥ 30 minutes, and meeting at least one of the following criteria: 1. ≥ 2 of the following pain features: unilateral, throbbing, moderate to severe or exacerbated with exercise/physical activity 2. ≥ 1 of the following associated symptoms: nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia

Secondary outcomes

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days at Month 3

Time frame · Baseline and at Month 3

Achievement of at least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days at Month 3. A migraine day was defined as any calendar day in which the subject experienced a qualified migraine headache defined as a migraine with or without aura, lasting for ≥ 30 minutes, and meeting at least one of the following criteria: 1. ≥ 2 of the following pain features: unilateral, throbbing, moderate to severe or exacerbated with exercise/physical activity 2. ≥ 1 of the following associated symptoms: nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia

Change From Baseline in Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days at Month 3

Time frame · Baseline up to Month 3

Number of days on which acute migraine-specific medications were used were recorded in eDiary between each monthly IP dose. Migraine-Specific medications include two categories of medications: triptan-based migraine medications and ergotamine-based migraine medications. Monthly migraine-specific medication use at baseline is the number of migraine-specific medication treatment days in the baseline period.

Change From Baseline in Headache Impact Scores as Measured by the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) at Month 3

Time frame · Baseline up to Month 3

The HIT-6 is a short-form self-administered questionnaire based on the internet-HIT question pool. The HIT-6 was developed as a global measure of adverse headache impact to assess headache severity in the previous month and change in a patient's clinical status over a short period of time. Six items assess the frequency of pain severity, headaches limiting daily activity (household, work, school, and social). Each of the 6 questions is responded to using 1 of 5 response categories: "never," "rarely," "sometimes," "very often," or "always." For each HIT-6 item, 6, 8, 10, 11, or 13 points, respectively, are assigned to the response provided. These points were summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78. Scores were categorized into 4 grades, representing little or no impact (49 or less), some impact (50-55), substantial impact (56-59), and severe impact (60-78) due to headache. Lower values represent better outcomes, therefore negative change denotes improveme

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Key inclusion criteria: 1. Documented history of migraine in the 12 months prior to screening 2. 4-14 days per month of migraine symptoms 3. \>=80% diary compliance during the Baseline period Key exclusion criteria: 1. \>50 years old at migraine onset 2. Pregnant or nursing 3. History of cluster or hemiplegic headache 4. Evidence of seizure or major psychiatric disorder 5. Score of 19 or higher on the BDI 6. Active chronic pain syndrome 7. Cardiac or hepatic disease

Study locations

81 registered sites.

Argentina · India · Lebanon · Malaysia · Mexico · Philippines · Singapore · South Korea · Taiwan · Thailand · Vietnam. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Novartis Investigative Site

CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Novartis Investigative Site

CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Novartis Investigative Site

CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Novartis Investigative Site

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Novartis Investigative Site

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Novartis Investigative Site

Ciudad Autonoma de Bs As, Argentina

Novartis Investigative Site

Córdoba, Argentina

Novartis Investigative Site

Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Mysore, Karnataka, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Kochi, Kerala, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Kochi, Kerala, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Kozhikode, Kerala, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Novartis Investigative Site

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Novartis Investigative Site

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Novartis Investigative Site

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Related trials

More studies on Calcitonin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.