Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT05692297·Not applicable·INTERVENTIONAL

Denosumab Treatment in CKD Patients at High Risk of Fracture

Status

Unknown

Phase

Not applicable

Enrollment

102

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Objective: To verify the efficacy and safety of denosumab in the prevention and treatment of CKD-MBD in CKD patients with high risk of fracture. Methods: A cohort of CKD patients with high risk of fracture was established and followed up for long periods (≥24 months). Patients with CKD3b-5D stage and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) scores at high risk or very high risk of fracture were enrolled. A multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled, interventional study was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups. The patients in the denosumab group received subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg once every 6 months, and the patients in the non-denosumab group received conventional treatment. Bone metabolic markers (serum calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, alkaline phosphatase, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, osteocalcin, total N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen, etc.), bone mineral density (dual-energy X-ray, quantitative CT), and vascular calcification score were regularly monitored. All adverse events (all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiac events, fracture, hospitalization, emergency department visits, etc.) were recorded during the follow-up period. Bone mineral density and clinical parameters were compared between the two groups.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Denosumab

The patients in the denosumab group received subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg once every 6 months for 24 months.

DRUG

Non-denosumab

Taken other medications, such as diphosphonates, active vitamin D and/or active vitamin D analogue, calcimimetics, calcitonin, estrogen receptor agonists, etc.

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jan 20, 2023

  2. Study start

    Jan 1, 2023

  3. Primary completion

    Dec 31, 2025

  4. Study completion

    Dec 31, 2025

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Jan 25, 2023

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Rate of bone mineral density (BMD) decline at the lumbar spine

Time frame · 24 months

Rate of BMD decline =\[(BMD24-BMD Baseline)÷BMD baseline\]\*100%

Secondary outcomes

Rate of fresh fractures, cardiovascular cerebrovascular adverse events and all-cause mortality

Time frame · 24 months

Fresh fractures were new non-traumatic fractures during follow-up. Cardiovascular cerebrovascular adverse events were Acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, shock, cardiac arrest, stroke, and lower limb arterial occlusion occurred during follow-up. All-cause mortality was death from any cause during follow-up.

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
100 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: * ≥18 years old; * Stage 3b-5D chronic kidney disease; * The 10-year probability of hip fracture assessed by fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) was \>5%; * Voluntarily signed informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 18 or ≥100 years; * Premenopausal women; * Denosumab was absolutely contraindicated; * Had received denosumab or bisphosphonates therapy; * Tertiary hyperparathyroidism; * Patients with malignant tumor; * Patients at risk for osteonecrosis of the jaw; * Estimated follow-up time ≤12 months.

Study locations

1 registered sites.

China. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Nephrology Department of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Calcitonin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.