Current partner codePEPTIDESDE
NCT05914077·Phase 3·INTERVENTIONAL

Aspiration of Duodenopancreatic Juice After Secretin Stimulation vs Endoscopic Aspiration for Molecular Analysis of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Intraductal Neoplasia.

Status

Unknown

Phase

Phase 3

Enrollment

140

Locations

1

Results

Not posted

Publications

0

Study summary

What the protocol is testing.

Study to evaluate aspiration of duodenopancreatic juice after secretin stimulation (ADPJ-secr)versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for molecular analysis of intraductal papillary mucinous intraductal neoplasia.

Interventions

Treatment arms and agents.

DRUG

Secretin

Secretin will be administered intravenous during 1 minute at a dose of 0,2 μg/Kg previous to the endoscopic procedure.

PROCEDURE

Endoscopic aspiration

Endoscopic aspiration of duodenopancreatic juice after secretin stimulation

PROCEDURE

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of intraductal papillary mucinous intraductal neoplasia (IPMN).

Timeline

From registration to results.

  1. First posted

    Jun 22, 2023

  2. Study start

    Sep 13, 2023

  3. Primary completion

    Jan 2025

  4. Study completion

    Jan 2025

  5. Results posted

    Not reported

  6. Registry updated

    Sep 18, 2023

Outcomes

What the study measures.

Primary outcomes

Proportion of patients with IPMN with GNAS and KRAS mutations in intracystic fluid obtained by EUS-FNA versus pancreatic juice obtained by ADPJ-secr after both techniques.

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

In intracystic fluid obtained by EUS-FNA versus pancreatic juice obtained by ADPJ-secr after both techniques.

Secondary outcomes

Proportion of patients with IPMN with Tp53 mutations.

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

In samples obtained by EUS-FNA versus ADPJ-secr after performing both techniques, in the subgroup of patients undergoing pancreatic resection within 12 months after study entry.

DNA concentration expressed in ng/µl

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

In samples obtained by EUS-FNA versus ADPJ-secr after performing both techniques.

Proportion of suitable samples obtained by the two techniques under study (ADPJ-secr and EUS-FNA) for molecular analysis.

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

A sample is defined as suitable when it is read by the Qubit fluorometer, which only detects full double-stranded DNA suitable for molecular analysis.

Proportion of patients undergoing pancreatic resection with a pathological diagnosis of IPMN who have mutations in GNAS and/or KRAS

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

In samples obtained by EUS-FNA versus ADPJ-secr within 12 months of study entry.

Proportion of patients undergoing pancreatic resection without a pathological diagnosis of IPMN who do not have GNAS and/or KRAS mutations

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

In samples obtained by EUS-FNA versus ADPJ-secr within 12 months of study entry.

Proportion of patients undergoing pancreatic resection with Tp53 mutations

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

In samples obtained by both techniques under study (ADPJ-secr vs EUS-FNA) who have advanced neoplasia in the surgical resection specimen after surgery performed within 12 months after study inclusion. Advanced neoplasia is defined as the presence of IPMN with high-grade dysplasia or IMPN with associated invasive carcinoma according to Lokuhetty D, et al. Digestive SystemTumours: WHO Classification of Tumours, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2019.

Proportion of patients undergoing pancreatic resection without Tp53 mutations.

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

In samples obtained by both techniques under study (ADPJ-secr vs EUS-FNA) who do not have advanced neoplasia in the surgical resection specimen after surgery performed within 12 months after inclusion in the study. Advanced neoplasia is defined as the presence of IPMN with high-grade dysplasia or IPMN with associated invasive carcinoma according to Lokuhetty D, et al. Digestive System Tumours: WHO Classification of Tumours, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2019.

To evaluate association between mutational status in the samples obtained by both techniques in relation to morphological characteristics of the lesion (diameter of the largest cystic lesion) obtained by EUS.

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

To compare if diameter of the largest cystic lesion in mm is different between both groups of study (mutated GNAS/KRAS versus non-mutated GNAS/KRAS \[wild type\]).

To evaluate association between mutational status in the samples obtained by both techniques in relation to morphological characteristics of the lesion (maximum diameter of the main pancreatic duct) obtained by EUS.

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

To compare if median maximum diameter of the main pancreatic duct assessed by EUS and measured in mm is different between both groups of study (mutated GNAS/KRAS versus non-mutated GNAS/KRAS \[wild type\]).

To evaluate association between mutational status in the samples obtained by both techniques in relation to morphological characteristics of the lesion (type of main pancreatic duct dilatation) obtained by EUS.

Time frame · Through study completion, an average of 30 months

To compare if the proportion of patients that present a segmental main pancreatic duct dilatation assessed by EUS is different between both groups of study (mutated GNAS/KRAS versus non-mutated GNAS/KRAS \[wild type\]).

Eligibility

Who can take part.

Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Be a man or woman over 18 years of age. 2. Willing to comply with the study procedures described in the protocol. 3. Willing and able to give written informed consent. 4. Meet at least one of the following three criteria in relation to the diagnosis or prognosis of IPMN: 4.1 Diagnosis of IMPN based on evidence of major criteria or existence of at least 2 minor criteria. Major criterion: Typical findings on MRI and/or EUS (single or multiple cysts with clear ductal communication and/or focal or diffuse dilatation # 5 mm in diameter of the main pancreatic duct without apparent obstructive cause). Minor criteria: a) Mucosecretory cells and/or extracellular mucin on cytological examination of intracystic fluid. b) Clear mucoid or filmy appearance of the intracystic fluid. c) Intracystic fluid CEA concentration \>192 ng/mL or intracystic glucose \< 50 mg/dL. 4.2 IPMN with cysts with a diameter # 10 mm and/or focal or diffuse dilatation of the main pancreatic duct with a diameter # 7 mm requiring EUS-FNA for diagnostic purposes or to assess risk or existence of malignancy following the main clinical practice guidelines. 4.3 IPMN with indication for surgical resection of the lesion. 5. In case of a woman of childbearing age\*, willing to use highly effective contraception or practice sexual abstinence from the screening visit until one week after undergoing the procedure under study. Highly effective contraceptive methods will include: combined oral, intravaginal or transdermal hormonal contraceptives (containing oestrogens and progestogens) associated with ovulation inhibition; oral, injectable or implantable progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with ovulation inhibition; intrauterine device; intrauterine hormone-releasing system; bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomised partner; and sexual abstinence. 6. If you are a woman of childbearing age, be willing to undergo a urine pregnancy test prior to inclusion in the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of surgery that prevents endoscopic access to the major duodenal papilla in the case of ADPJ-secr, or to the area of the stomach or intestine from which to perform FNA. 2. History of acute pancreatitis during the 30 days prior to inclusion. 3. Pregnant women, women who may become pregnant during the month prior to inclusion or women who are breastfeeding. 4. Coagulopathy (PT \< 25%, INR \> 1.5, platelets \< 50,000/mL) preventing FNA. 5. Renal failure with GFR \< 30 mL/min or patients on dialysis. 6. Known hypersensitivity to any component of the ChiRhoStim® (human secretin) formulation. 7. Any clinically relevant medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unfit to participate in the study (underlying haematological disorders, autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, renal, hepatic and cardiopulmonary disorders).

Study locations

1 registered sites.

Spain. Showing up to 24 locations stored in the fast local snapshot.

Hospital Clínic de Barcelona

Barcelona, Spain

Publications

Results and literature.

No PMID-linked publications were present in this registry snapshot.

Primary links

Continue at the source.

Related trials

More studies on Secretin.

Related PeptideStat pages

Put the record in context.

Research pages describe evidence. Vendor pages, where available, describe independently tracked research-product listings and are not clinical recommendations.